Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Caves to Biden’s Gun-Grabbing Agenda: Upholds Rule Mandating Serial Numbers and Background Checks for Ghost Guns — Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented
The Gateway Pundit ^ | March 28, 2025 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 03/26/2025 11:12:12 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin

In a gut punch to Second Amendment defenders, the Supreme Court today upheld a Biden administration rule clamping down on “ghost guns,” those untraceable firearms that patriots and hobbyists have long cherished as a symbol of American freedom.

With a 7-2 decision, the court greenlit a radical overreach by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), mandating serial numbers, background checks, and age verification for gun kits bought online.

Last year, a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said a 2022 rule aimed at weapons that could be built from parts bought online without a background check exceeded the agency’s authority.

...

The rule redefined the legal meaning of “firearm,” “frame,” and “receiver” as written in the Gun Control Act of 1968.

Judge Kurt Engelhardt wrote in the decision that “law-making power—the ability to transform policy into real-world obligations—lies solely with the legislative branch.”

“An agency cannot label conduct lawful one day and felonious the next—yet that is exactly what ATF accomplishes through its Final Rule,” he wrote.

...

At the heart of the case, Bondi v. VanDerStok, was the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)’s 2022 rule redefining the term “firearm” under the Gun Control Act of 1968 to include certain weapon parts kits and unfinished frames and receivers—items that law-abiding hobbyists, veterans, and collectors have used for decades to legally build their own firearms at home.

Despite the plain language of the statute, the Supreme Court—led by Justice Neil Gorsuch and joined by the Court’s liberal bloc—found that the ATF’s sweeping interpretation was not “facially inconsistent” with the law. This decision hands the previous administration a major victory.

In other words, your partially milled piece of aluminum is now a “firearm” because the ATF says so.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; gorsuchmustgo; neilgorsuch; noauthority; removerobertsnow; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
So SCOTUS now greenlights the feds regulating anything that can be converted into a firearm with some work. Most disappointing is that all three of Trump's appointees to SCOTUS engaged in an unprecedent power grab to expand the administrative state in a way never before imagined.
1 posted on 03/26/2025 11:12:12 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

If ATF goes down the drain, this means nothing, right ?


2 posted on 03/26/2025 11:14:32 AM PDT by George from New England (escaped CT back in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George from New England

Until the next gun-grabbing, America-hating, administration. And the records will be there.

We need Congress to change the law to stop this crap. What a disaster!


3 posted on 03/26/2025 11:17:21 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: George from New England
If ATF goes down the drain, this means nothing, right ?

The regs and even the laws can be changed. The problem is that SCOTUS just set a precedent that an agency can rewrite a law in way never intended by Congress or the president who singed the law. This is just a massive expansion of the Administrative State. Bondi can request a rehearing and change the AG's position, but the precedent has still been set. The next rat in the WH will just rewrite the reg unless that law itself is clarified.
4 posted on 03/26/2025 11:17:41 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

“In a gut punch to Second Amendment defenders,”

If, as Alito and Thomas say, the gun kit parts are not firearms, then second amendment protections don’t apply.


5 posted on 03/26/2025 11:17:45 AM PDT by JSM_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

The real test should have been and should be whether the Gun Control Act of 1968 is Constitutional as per recent SCOTUS decisions. As I read it, the question was whether or not the ATF exceeded its authority under the GCA.

And since the ATF in now under new management, I expect the new definition is or soon will be changed. (Barring a District Court judge ruling otherwise, of course).


6 posted on 03/26/2025 11:21:58 AM PDT by hanamizu ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Undoing Chevron deference?


7 posted on 03/26/2025 11:27:11 AM PDT by gundog (The ends justify the mean tweets. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

More here:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4306878/posts

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4306880/posts

😊👍


8 posted on 03/26/2025 11:30:34 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within ? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gundog
Undoing Chevron deference?

The elitist judges like the regulation. Therefore, it will stand regardless of the fact that the Congress never passed any such law.
9 posted on 03/26/2025 11:35:59 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

So the Supreme Court has decided that the Bruen decision was meaningless. There were no serial numbers required on guns and most guns were made by individual artisans, often for themselves in the first half of the 19th century.

There is no historic basis for this restriction.

Bruen is dead. And he was so young.


10 posted on 03/26/2025 11:35:59 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

I believe this is for the “kits” that included the 80% lower, the jigs and the tooling to complete the lower.

80% lowers and parts are still available and legal.


11 posted on 03/26/2025 11:42:50 AM PDT by OSHA (Steve Womack is a backstabbing backbencher warmonger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Next up: common sense lathe and mill restrictions ... and Pop Tart nibbling control!


12 posted on 03/26/2025 11:47:38 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Yep.

The ATF should go the way of Dept. Of Ed.


13 posted on 03/26/2025 12:10:36 PM PDT by sauropod (Make sure Satan has to climb over a lot of Scripture to get to you. John MacArthur Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Stamp the same serial number on
every “gun”...


14 posted on 03/26/2025 12:12:35 PM PDT by Lean-Right (Eat More Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OSHA

11

It will apply to whatever a judge says it applies to.
Then the poor saps involved can fight for a decade to hear what a majority of The Nine say.


15 posted on 03/26/2025 12:17:53 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

This bodes ill for other Trump administration cases reaching these black basted bozos-Supremos. They will be lazy, take the easy way out, and give Trump cases a 50/50 split for yea or nay.

You know who these jerks really play to? And want admiration from? Their peers in the legal profession USA-— “As of early 2024, the United States has approximately 1,322,649 active lawyers”


16 posted on 03/26/2025 12:27:10 PM PDT by dennisw (💯🇺🇸 Truth is Hate to those who Hate the Truth. 🇺🇸💯)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Change the GCA of 1968?

Why can’t Congress do anything? They have abdicated so much of their authority to the Executive.


17 posted on 03/26/2025 12:30:40 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSM_Liberty
If, as Alito and Thomas say, the gun kit parts are not firearms, then second amendment protections don’t apply.

So then ATF is regulating commerce in a way not intended by Congress or the president who signed the law for things not yet legally firearms. The regulation just evolved independent of the legislative branch, and SCOTUS liked the regulation and approved it. That is not how a representative democratic republic is intended to work, and it is nothing less than SCOTUS approving of an ever expanding Administrative State.
18 posted on 03/26/2025 1:00:37 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

“The ATF should go the way of Dept. Of Ed.”

The Dept. Of Ed. has gone nowhere. To my most current information, Congress has yet to repeal the 1979 law which created the Dept.

Just saying the Dept will be paused for 4 years has value. but its value is small.

The Dept. Of Ed. has gone nowhere. The next President will restore it, I guarantee it.

We better get Congress to repeal that law. - it’s what I want anyways. This court case puts much more emphasis on the need for Congress to pass a law repealing the ATF - another action Congress will not do. Sigh.


19 posted on 03/26/2025 1:08:36 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot vote our way out of these problems. The only way out is to activist our way out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

The judicial branch has just declared war against the American people plain and simple. We’re heading straight into a nasty revolution. If we do not take our country back we are done. I believe that we will not last till the end of the year if these rogue Judges continuing slashing and dicing the constitution. I for one am ready for what is coming. Pray that I am wrong but the atmosphere is ripe for it!


20 posted on 03/26/2025 1:31:07 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson