Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A D.O.J. lawyer repeatedly refuses to answer a federal judge’s questions about deportations to El Salvador.
The New York Times ^ | March 17, 2025 6:45 PM EDT | Alan Feuer and Zolan Kanno-Youngs

Posted on 03/17/2025 4:01:04 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

The Trump administration on Monday repeatedly stonewalled a federal judge seeking answers about whether the government had violated his order barring the deportation of more than 200 noncitizens without due process, escalating a conflict that threatened to become a constitutional crisis.

At a hearing in Federal District Court in Washington, a Justice Department lawyer refused to answer any detailed questions about the deportation flights to El Salvador that took place over the weekend, arguing that President Trump had broad authority to remove the immigrants from the United States under an obscure wartime law known as the Alien Enemies Act.

The tense back-and-forth in court between Judge James E. Boasberg and the Justice Department lawyer, Abhishek Kambli, left open the possibility of further conflict down the road.

Judge Boasberg directed Mr. Kambli to inform him by noon on Tuesday exactly what time the government believes his order stopping the deportation flights went into effect, a piece of information that will be crucial as the judge seeks to determine whether the Trump administration had flouted his authority.

The legal battle over the removal of the immigrants was the latest — and perhaps most serious — flashpoint yet between federal courts, which have sought to curb many of Mr. Trump’s recent executive actions, and an administration that has repeatedly come close to openly refusing to comply with judicial orders.

Earlier Monday, Mr. Trump’s so-called border czar, Tom Homan, made defiant remarks on television, indicating that the administration planned to continue such deportations despite the court’s order — an action that could pit one of the coequal branches of the government against another.

“We’re not stopping,” Mr. Homan said on Monday, during an appearance on Fox News. “I don’t care what the judges think — I don’t care what the left thinks. We’re coming.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alanfeuer; aliens; article2; deport; elsalvador; enemyagentjudge; enemyjudge; fafo; foulmouthedfilth; interference; jamesboasberg; judgewatch; judicialcoup; judicialmisconduct; maga; noauthority; nojurisdiction; nolegalauthority; obstruction; rentagavel; rentajimmy; standing; treasonjudge; undermining; unlawfulorders; zolankannoyoungs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
You have no standing, Judge Jimmy.
1 posted on 03/17/2025 4:01:04 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They just didn’t like the answers. Trump doesn’t have to answer to some arrogant lower court judge. Period.


2 posted on 03/17/2025 4:03:29 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Do the math. L+G+B+T+Q = 66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“The Trump administration on Monday repeatedly stonewalled a federal judge”...

After years of federal judges stonewalling Trump.

Karma is a bitch.


3 posted on 03/17/2025 4:05:54 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Need to send him a red hot poker and ignore him.

Enough of this simpleton crap.


4 posted on 03/17/2025 4:06:50 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Donald John Trump. First man to be Elected to the Presidency THREE times since FDR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
what time the government believes his order stopping the deportation flights went into effect

How about never?

5 posted on 03/17/2025 4:07:25 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Flouted HIS AUTHORITY this asshat has NO authority over the POTUS!!! GIVE ME A DAMN BREAK!!!


6 posted on 03/17/2025 4:07:30 PM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Where does a DISTRICT Federal judge derive the power to apply a ruling to the entire jurisdiction of the United States? It would only apply in the particular district where the complaint was made.

A judge cannot simply rule on something that may be nothing more than a private belief or a simmering prejudice. There has to be a complaint, and some basis in law that makes the complaint valid, or at least plausible..


7 posted on 03/17/2025 4:08:03 PM PDT by alloysteel ( Divergence is not at all the same thing as diversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
an action that could pit one of the coequal branches of the government against another

That makes no sense. That low level federal pimp appointed by that retard o'bummer is not a "branch" of govt. If this ascends to skotus, then it's coequal.

But that c un t lackey has no standing and no authority to countermand the President of the United States.

8 posted on 03/17/2025 4:08:39 PM PDT by LouAvul (1 John 2:22: He that denies that Jesus is the Christ is a liar and antichrist. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Here is a better account of what happened in court, minus the lying NYTs angle.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4304938/posts


9 posted on 03/17/2025 4:08:42 PM PDT by hardspunned (Look for the“Putin Stooge” libel, news from Ukraine you’ve gradually grown to trust over 30 months s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A district court is not co-equal to the Office of POTUS.


10 posted on 03/17/2025 4:08:43 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

flouted his authority? You have no authority over the president of the United States, your honor.


11 posted on 03/17/2025 4:09:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: E. Pluribus Unum

New York Times is NOT credible.


13 posted on 03/17/2025 4:14:34 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Homan should bring a busload of those noncitizens to Boasberg’s court, drop the off at the door, and tell Boasberg that if he is going to prevent the government from deporting them, then the good judge can deal with them.


14 posted on 03/17/2025 4:16:04 PM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

These F’ers aren’t going to go gently into that good night. President Trump and the Justice Department, or the military, better give no quarter, build cases and start the arrests soon.


15 posted on 03/17/2025 4:16:28 PM PDT by dznutz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The DOJ response to Judge Boasberg should have simply been, “with all due respect Judge Boasberg, GFY.” Then simply walk out.

Never engage.


16 posted on 03/17/2025 4:16:30 PM PDT by OHPatriot (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

Hey, “judge” Jimmy Biasjerk - check up your butt for yer order.

You might some “odor” and some “ordure” at the same time.


17 posted on 03/17/2025 4:18:43 PM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Judge Boasberg directed Mr. Kambli to inform him by noon on Tuesday exactly what time the government believes his order stopping the deportation flights went into effect”

None of that matters. A judge has zero legal authority to issue orders to the president reference this, or to an airline pilot in the sky. Even if he had a legal right to interfere with the president, he has no idea of the fuel state, the winds aloft, remaining crew duty day, airports within diversion range, condition of the aircraft, ATC issues at Cetera. This Judge needs a good hard pimp slap.


18 posted on 03/17/2025 4:18:49 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
”Judge Boasberg directed Mr. Kambli to inform him by noon on Tuesday exactly what time the government believes his order stopping the deportation flights went into effect.” About a hair past a mole, judge.
19 posted on 03/17/2025 4:19:15 PM PDT by cross_bearer_02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Boastburg,” “Don’t you know WHO I AM?”
Yes, oh yes we do.


20 posted on 03/17/2025 4:20:51 PM PDT by Shady (The Force of Liberty must prevail for the sake of our Children and Grandchildren...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson