Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat Mayors Refuse to Answer If They Would Turn Over Illegal Aliens to ICE
Breitbart ^ | 03/06/2025 | Alana Mastrangelo

Posted on 03/06/2025 9:03:29 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27

Democrat mayors refused to answer whether they would turn over illegal immigrant criminals to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) during a hearing on Wednesday.

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson would not explicitly answer Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer’s (R-KY) question.

“Would you turn this criminal over to ICE on a detainer?” Comer asked Johnson, to which the Chicago mayor replied by dodging the question, stating, “Our local law enforcement works hard every day to get criminals off the streets of Chicago.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aidandabet; aliens; answer; corruption; crime; democrat; ice; illegal; mayors; over; refuse; treason; turn
Johnson has a 6 percent approval rate. Not to worry because Chicago will vote somebody even worse the next election. Its not the policies its Johnson not getting it right. The next Mayor will get it right...
1 posted on 03/06/2025 9:03:29 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I can’t believe it is that hard to find a decent mayor in Boston or Chicago. Surely there is someone better than Wu Wu and Brandon.


2 posted on 03/06/2025 9:06:47 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (SCOTUS stuck it to Americans again. Africa and other failed communist dumps are our responsibility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I noticed that President Trump repeatedly referred to the Democrats as “The Democrat Party” in his speech Wednesday night.

The MSM-Democrats absolutely hate this. In fact, I remember at least one cable talk show in which the “host” threatened to throw a guest off the show because he continued to use that term.

But after the way the Democrats forced Kamala Harris into the top spot for the 2024 election, I think any argument that the Democrats are “democratic” is utterly and completely gone.


3 posted on 03/06/2025 9:07:51 AM PST by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Have AG Bondi’s arrest warrants in hand when calling the bluff of these traitorous Demonicrat mayors.


4 posted on 03/06/2025 9:08:58 AM PST by Carl Vehse (Make Austin Texas Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Why bother with the hypothetical? Either their refusal is a crime or it’s not. Order them to comply with the law and turn over illegals. If they refuse and it’s a crime, prosecute, convict, and jail them. If it’s not a crime, don’t bother with meaningless gestures, and take measures to make it a crime.


5 posted on 03/06/2025 9:09:58 AM PST by Savage Beast (There's a Light over the Whole World. I just want everybody to be happy, healthy and well. --DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Not a problem with the mayors. Just withhold all federal funds going to those cities. My guess is that it will take case of itself.


6 posted on 03/06/2025 9:12:33 AM PST by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The Feds just need to watch them and arrest these people if they knowingly break the law.


7 posted on 03/06/2025 9:13:52 AM PST by Rocky Mountain Wild Turkey ("I have an open mind ... just not so open that my brain falls out onto the floor!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
If I were on the House committee, I would have asked each mayor four simple questions:

  1. Did you take an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States?

  2. Are you aware that Article VI of the Constitution says it "shall be the supreme Law of the Land... any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding?"

  3. Are your sanctuary cities declaring that federal immigration law does not apply to them?

  4. As mayor, are you in violation of your oath of office and the Constitution of the United States?

-PJ

8 posted on 03/06/2025 9:19:37 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Democracy and Communism have something in common.
Like Communism, Democracy has never worked, whenever and where ever it is tried


9 posted on 03/06/2025 9:23:43 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alteration; The acronym defines the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: econjack

They are in violation of federal law and need to be arrested and prosecuted


10 posted on 03/06/2025 9:37:30 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

As liberal as Chicago is, I think Chicago citizens all would be happy if ICE arrested Johnson for interfering with their operations.


11 posted on 03/06/2025 9:43:41 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

“Order them to comply with the law and turn over illegals.”

You’re the first one I read in the responses that actually gets to the answer. There are ways to do this but walking into the offices of the city and demanding the turning over of a criminal from their jail that has boken their law, is not workable.

The assumption of fedeal law superceding state law is not quite correct. If a person serving for a crime in a state is under lock and key then it becomes deal making for the feds to get him through extradition. But, the minute that criminal steps out of total state control he is open season for federal prosecution.

Thus, if the city is trying to protect the criminal from federal prosecution, they can’t release him, parole him, or let him into the real world with any of his own recognisance as that implies freedom other than certain conditions which also require him to not break the law for them or any other jurisdiction. So, they have to house him, feed him and entertain him within the scope of complete responsibility that doesn’t allow him access to US soil outside of their purview. They just adopted him. And the only way to get him off their books is to extradite him the federal jurisdiction.

wy69


12 posted on 03/06/2025 9:45:31 AM PST by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: whitney69

What about if the prisoner is released to their home but has ankle bracelets.

Are they fair game for the feds at that point?

At the moment they break out of the bracelets?

What do you think?


13 posted on 03/06/2025 9:48:18 AM PST by cgbg (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Michelle Wu is a presumably intelligent Harvard graduate, but she stupidly allows illegals to invade her city.

Wu is coming up for election. I hope that the people of Boston can throw her out (probably for another Dim, unfortunately).


14 posted on 03/06/2025 10:12:54 AM PST by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honorary Serb

Michelle Wu is a presumably intelligent Harvard graduate, but she stupidly allows illegals to invade her city.


Yamamoto went to Harvard, too.


15 posted on 03/06/2025 10:13:48 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

One solution goes back 4000 years:

Death Penalty for Perjury.


16 posted on 03/06/2025 11:13:12 AM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor

-PJ

17 posted on 03/06/2025 11:32:54 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Democracy has never worked, whenever and where ever it is tried


Last attempt at democracy was circa 500BC.


18 posted on 03/06/2025 11:42:59 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

“Are they fair game for the feds at that point?”

This is the game they are playing. The cities, counties and states all seem to have different release points. Federal law under 18 USC 3624: Release of a prisoner states:

(a) Date of Release.-A prisoner shall be released by the Bureau of Prisons on the date of the expiration of the prisoner’s term of imprisonment, less any time credited toward the service of the prisoner’s sentence as provided in subsection (b). If the date for a prisoner’s release falls on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday at the place of confinement, the prisoner may be released by the Bureau on the last preceding weekday.

What the local jurisdiction is trying to do in many cases is keep control of the status of a prisoner, some even through parole, which could be a substantial time. But there is a cost to the controlling of the person and if Trump decides to withdraw certain federal funds and put the burden of the bill on the local purse it will have an effect on there decision to release or burden them with budget shorts. It isn’t just a simple matter of rules but of political ideologies and a standown eyeball to eyeball. And the liberals are defending their voting base they have gone to great lengths to obtain.

So when the bills go up, and they have to cut services to maintain normalcies, hopefully their constitutents will wake up to the fact that their politicians are harboring criminals at a cost over their law abiding, apparently stupid, mainstream citizens. But, you can lead a horse to water as they could have released them to fedeeral authorities right off the bat and be rid of the problem right away. But there goes their voting numbers. And their are 13 million in the country right now in jeopardy. And the blatant stupidity is that if this was not an illegal they were counting on to vote, they’d have got him/her out of the jurisdiction at the first asking.

wy69


19 posted on 03/06/2025 3:34:38 PM PST by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun
All three won referrals to the DOJ. A strong woman awarded the clowns their prizes. I suspect sanctuary enclaves will be revisiting their priorities. Soon.

Save that dystopian speak for the end of the world dramas.

20 posted on 03/06/2025 3:46:11 PM PST by Kudsman (We shall come rejoicing, bringing in the sheaves. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson