Skip to comments.
Ohio lawmakers prepare to introduce 'Contraception Begins at Erection Act'
Local12 ^
| 02 11 2025
| Staff
Posted on 02/12/2025 6:32:35 PM PST by yesthatjallen
CINCINNATI (WKRC) - Ohio lawmakers are preparing to introduce the "Contraception Begins at Erection Act," which would make it illegal for men to have sex without trying to create a child.
Two Ohio representatives, Anita Somani and Tristan Rader, posted a video to Bluesky detailing their plan regarding the bill, which was first introduced in Mississippi by Senator Bradford Blackmon.
"Fair is fair, right?" Somani said in the video. "If this legislature is so dedicated to regulating women's bodies and their access to contraceptives and abortion care then let's start policing men in the same way. After all, it does take two to tango, right?"
"Our bill would make it illegal to discharge semen or genetic material without the intent to fertilize an embryo," she continued.
SNIP
(Excerpt) Read more at local12.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcontrol; contraception; erection; ohio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: yesthatjallen
2
posted on
02/12/2025 6:34:51 PM PST
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
To: yesthatjallen
InSANITY!! These people need to be admitted in a MENTAL ward!
3
posted on
02/12/2025 6:34:51 PM PST
by
pollywog
(" O thou who changest not....ABIDE with me")
To: yesthatjallen
4
posted on
02/12/2025 6:36:39 PM PST
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
To: yesthatjallen
Oh. Ok.
It’s psycho leftist feminazis trying to be clever.
5
posted on
02/12/2025 6:36:41 PM PST
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: yesthatjallen
It wouldn’t survive a constitutional challenge under the First Amendment. It is a fundamental belief of conservative Presbyterians that married couples can have sex for fun.
Sounds like the Papists may be trying to pull a fast one.
6
posted on
02/12/2025 6:37:43 PM PST
by
PAR35
To: pollywog
They’re Democrats, so..
What about their LGBTQ+ buddies? 😂😄😆
7
posted on
02/12/2025 6:38:40 PM PST
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
To: PAR35
Sounds like the Papists may be trying to pull a fast one. The two Democrats who proposed this bill are Hindu (Anita) and "undisclosed religion" (Tristan).
(Seriously, Tristan has no public info available about his religion AFAIK, so he might be agnostic.)
8
posted on
02/12/2025 6:42:41 PM PST
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(There is nothing new under the sun.)
To: yesthatjallen
The left can’t meme and doesn’t know how to make good humor.
To: yesthatjallen
This sounds related to how women dress.
10
posted on
02/12/2025 6:45:13 PM PST
by
ansel12
((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
To: yesthatjallen
Women should be seen, and not heard.
11
posted on
02/12/2025 6:48:33 PM PST
by
MagaMatt
(Sapere aude.)
To: yesthatjallen
Well it would never past Constitutional muster but even if it did get through, it would put a huge dent in children out of wedlock and do wonders for promoting abstinence.
I say let’s call their bluff and pass it and see how it works out. What’s the worst that could happen?
To: SaveFerris
13
posted on
02/12/2025 6:52:36 PM PST
by
MikelTackNailer
(Listen to me now, think about it later and cry about it some other day.)
To: PAR35
Just when I start feeling proud of how much smarter than liberals we conservatives are I see a post like yours and realize we have our own dense people, too.
To: yesthatjallen
Misandry abounds. Guilty for being a man. Hateful people.
15
posted on
02/12/2025 6:58:20 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: yesthatjallen
16
posted on
02/12/2025 6:58:38 PM PST
by
lightman
(Beat the Philly fraud machine the Amish did onest, ja? Nein, zweimal they did already!)
To: yesthatjallen
"Our bill would make it illegal to discharge semen or genetic material without the intent to fertilize an embryo," she continued.
A second bill should be introduced that , every time a man gets an erection, the people (democrats) voting for that bill, have to provide a woman free of charge. And it must be a good-looking woman, not something like Whoopi Goldberg or Joy Behar or Maxine Waters.
17
posted on
02/12/2025 7:00:59 PM PST
by
adorno
( )
To: yesthatjallen
Wet dreams.
They want to make just being a man illegal, criminal.
They just despise men. Jealous, hate themselves, bitter no man pays attention to them, entitled but not getting what they want.
They think their man hating is truly novel and clever.
18
posted on
02/12/2025 7:01:04 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: yesthatjallen
LOVE ridiculous! Absolutely great. Can’t you just hear the arguments for the bill in the chamber?
19
posted on
02/12/2025 7:01:16 PM PST
by
mairdie
To: yesthatjallen
this is nutz...
"Our bill would make it illegal to discharge semen or genetic material without the intent to fertilize an embryo," she continued.
So, if he has intent and the woman does get pregnant, does it now gives him a right to a say so if that woman wants to have an abortion ?
So, if he has intent and the woman is on the pill and there wont be ovulation hence no embryo, can he sue for fraud ?
so...oh nevermind
20
posted on
02/12/2025 7:06:42 PM PST
by
stylin19a
( If you think it's hard to meet new people, try picking up the wrong golf ball.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson