Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Obama-appointed judge ruled that President Trump must work with Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger, a Biden-appointed official, instead of his own chosen legal counsel
X ^ | 2/11/25 | amuse

Posted on 02/11/2025 8:02:01 AM PST by hardspunned

An Obama-appointed judge ruled that President Trump must work with Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger, a Biden-appointed official, instead of his own chosen legal counsel. Judge Jackson issued an order mandating Dellinger represent the president and barred Trump from appointing any other Special Counsel.

(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amybermanjackson; arrestbermanjackson; biden; dellinger; demonicrat; interference; judgewatch; judicialmisconduct; judicialsedition; lawfare; noauthority; nojurisdiction; obama; obamanation; obstruction; sabotage; specialcounsel; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
Get all of their madness out there. Farther and farther out on the limb. Trump will take the entire bunch out in one move.

The Lawfare hacks are trying to out outrage each other.

1 posted on 02/11/2025 8:02:01 AM PST by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Yup, separation of powers, it is constitutional.


2 posted on 02/11/2025 8:04:05 AM PST by exnavy (See article IV section 4 of our constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

GFY. Judge.


3 posted on 02/11/2025 8:04:32 AM PST by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

These Judges need to be treated just the same as a Stickup Man. Jail them.


4 posted on 02/11/2025 8:04:45 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

How does Berman-Jackson get all these cases? The clerk’s office must be completely corrupt.


5 posted on 02/11/2025 8:10:23 AM PST by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Click-bait.

Trump still has his own legal counsel.


6 posted on 02/11/2025 8:10:55 AM PST by TexasGator (!'/111'r/11111.111''!11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Trump set the trap and they think they are so clever.

Would anyone expect this? They dig deeper.


7 posted on 02/11/2025 8:11:33 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued, but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned
I am sure this will pass constitutional muster, forcing you to use an enemy as council!
8 posted on 02/11/2025 8:11:56 AM PST by packrat35 (Pureblood! No clot shot for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned
Insanity rules...PDJT goes UP in acceptance..

Dims..Democrats...Progressiv's and Communists ..(but repeat myself) demoralized..discombobulated and destroyed.

9 posted on 02/11/2025 8:12:14 AM PST by spokeshave (Proud Boys, Angry Dads. Grumpy Grandads & Curmudgeons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

At this rate there won’t be any sharks left for the Left to jump!


10 posted on 02/11/2025 8:13:18 AM PST by workerbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exnavy

I’m certain this is all going to end up at Scotus, because lawfare is all the left has now, and there are plent of judges who will go full-Erdogan to slow or stop Trump.

Maybe he can expedite one of them and get Scotus to issue a broad ruling that the Executive Branch can in fact operate as the Constitution provides and that will get the rest of them dismissed, like what happened with the immunity ruling.


11 posted on 02/11/2025 8:13:28 AM PST by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

And?

No context?

No what is the case about?

No index number so the case can be looked up in PACER?

Nothing?

This is apparently what passes for citizen journalism for X user “amuse”.

Hack citizen journalism.

Amuse indeed.


12 posted on 02/11/2025 8:14:45 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I think you are correct. I hope for a scotus review, soon.


13 posted on 02/11/2025 8:15:36 AM PST by exnavy (See article IV section 4 of our constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie; All

Remember we liked it when judges we liked made rulings slowing down the Zero agenda. This activity popped up roughly during Civil Rights\Vietnam War Days (1960s). (Note: Remember Federal Courts ordering bussing and re-drawing school districts!) It was “popular” because these courts seemed to do something “necessary” that Congress & the Executive were incapable of doing. Still was unconstitutional and a misuse of the federal court system then as it is now!


14 posted on 02/11/2025 8:15:42 AM PST by Reily (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Here, I’ll do the job for “amuse”

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/judge-temporarily-reinstates-fired-ethics-watchdog-hampton-dellinger-rcna191614


15 posted on 02/11/2025 8:16:35 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Hampton Dellinger is the head of The Office of Special Counsel, who is responsible for protecting the federal workforce from illegal personnel actions, such as retaliation for whistleblowing. It investigates whistleblower claims of reprisal, can pursue disciplinary action against employees who punish whistleblowers and provides a channel for employees to disclose government wrongdoing.

Hampton Dellinger claims he/she (not sure which) was fired illegally & has been reinstated by the judge to that position. This is not Trump’s attorney.


16 posted on 02/11/2025 8:16:51 AM PST by Qiviut (Come! Live in the light! Shine with the joy and the love of the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

The roulette wheel just seems to stop on Amy’s square. /sarc


17 posted on 02/11/2025 8:17:10 AM PST by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

worms


18 posted on 02/11/2025 8:18:10 AM PST by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qiviut

Good post—the headline is misleading.

We discussed this case of leftist judge insanity yesterday.


19 posted on 02/11/2025 8:19:49 AM PST by cgbg (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All

And “amuse”, you ignorant hack, here’s the docket for the case:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/56819480/DELLINGER_v_BESSENT_et_al


20 posted on 02/11/2025 8:20:03 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson