Posted on 02/02/2025 9:07:35 AM PST by Macho MAGA Man
John Solomon @jsolomonReports
CBS agrees to give FCC transcripts of raw '60 Minutes' Harris interview at heart of Trump lawsuit
From justthenews.com
11:00 AM · Feb 2, 2025
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
This could doom what is left of her political career. Her opposition could have a field day with this.
This is exactly what I was thinking!
I saw her at Carter’s funeral. Unbelievable. The way she walked in, turned around when she heard Clinton and Obama (whoever was behind her) and then turned back around like ‘haruuuuumpf’ when they didn’t speak to her was just pathetic - reeking of an immature, trashy high school child.
After her righteous and very hysterical a$$ whipping, she had the audacity to immediately announced plans to run in 2028 - she is crazy and so far beyond stupid and ignorant that it hurts me.
“TRANSCRIPTS”-—NO-—THE ACTUAL UNEDITED VIDEO.
EITHER WAY-—CBS IS TOAST.
BIDEN TRANSCRIPTS GOT SERIOUS “ADJUSTMENTS” FOR OVER 4 years.
I am losing trying to recall what was the issue with the edit CBS did?
Just because Trump won, doesn’t mean their pants can’t be sued off for election interference.
For the most part, I agreed with settling the ABC suit.
It was election interference, but it was not as good a case as this one because the interference was on the part of just one person as the record showed that ABC legal had warned Georgie not to use the R word.
This case has lots of bad actors not just one.
Plus there is also a cover-up which failed.
I don’t really want a settlement here.
Let CBS slowly twist in the wind for Trump’s entire term if that is how long it goes.
The answer to a question was Kamala-style garble. Later she gave a more coherent version of the same point. So they edited it so the coherent answer was presented as the answer to the question, rather than the answer actually given. I don’t even remember the topic, but that’s what they did
2. Will it be real, or will they alter it as well?
3. DJT should offer $10 M to whoever purloins a real copy of the video and sends it to his legal team.
They edited it before airing snippets. Same question two different answerers. DJT is suing for 10billion for election tampering.
Trump should not agree to an interview unless they give him the raw footage afterwards.
I would not even trust them to give up the raw footage. The president should/will always have his own recorder filming.
Even just raw audio here would be sufficient. Maybe fedgov could make a new law/regulation that sit-down media interviews have been be live recorded by political opponents so as to prevent selective editing that could amount to illegal election tampering. As evidently happened here.
(The president should/will always have his own recorder filming.)
I agree but at the time he wasn’t president during Kamala’s interview.
p
Now why would anyone think CBS might falsify the transcript, just because the whole case is about CBS falsifying Harris’s original presentation.../s
On the upside, after CBS presents a false transcript, the original video can be used to catch them doubling down on fraud.
Actually, I thought they used her “edited” answer from a completely different part of the conversation.
We want the raw video.
Not winning, transcripts can be altered. I believe we got transcripts of J6 testimony that are also worthless & inaccurate, while they deleted the actual video taped testimonies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.