Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump plans to unleash fossil fuels and mining in 2025, unraveling Democrats green new deal
Just the News ^ | December 31, 2024 11:37pm Updated: December 31, 2024 11:42pm | Kevin Killough

Posted on 01/01/2025 3:43:38 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

Coming with the new year is a new president with a very different vision on energy than President Joe Biden, who campaigned on a promise to “end fossil fuel.”

President-elect Donald Trump is dismissive of the immediate “climate crisis” narrative that drove much of Biden’s energy policies. He promises to establish American “energy dominance” and focus policy on bringing down the cost of energy. 

While Trump can overturn Biden’s industry-punishing executive orders and create a friendlier regulatory environment for the oil, gas, coal and mining industries, experts say there are economic and technical limits to what the outcomes of his policies will be. Looking ahead to 2025 and beyond, here’s what we might expect for energy and industry in the second Trump administration. 

Market forces

During a speech at the Economic Club of New York luncheon in September, Trump said he would end the Biden-Harris administration’s “anti-energy crusade and implement a policy of energy abundance, energy independence, and even energy dominance.” This would include, he said, getting the price of gasoline down below $2 per gallon, which would decrease the cost of all goods and services. 

“We have more liquid gold under our feet than any other country, including Russia and Saudi Arabia [and] will be using it. My plan will cut energy prices in half or more than that within 12 months of taking office. It will be an economic revival of our country like no one has ever seen before,” Trump said before his campaign proved successful in the November election. 

Trump has shown a commitment to these energy pathways by nominating North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum for Interior Secretary, who led the third highest oil-producing state in the U.S. Trump also nominated Liberty Energy CEO Chris Wright for Energy Secretary...

(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bloggers; drillbabydrill; economy; energy; gas; greennewscam; oil; presidentelecttrump; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 01/01/2025 3:43:38 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

‘Bout time. Now get these changes through Congress so a future president can’t undo them, again.


2 posted on 01/01/2025 3:48:50 PM PST by nuke_road_warrior (Making the world safe for nuclear power for over 20 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Ending fossil fuel” sounds fine to me, as long as we have something to replace it with without compromising the economy. We don’t. The “green new deal” is basically a plan to hobble and starve America, while making China the leading superpower.


3 posted on 01/01/2025 3:53:44 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuke_road_warrior

Trumps change in policies will help, but the States have jurisdiction on generating resource requirements. If a liberal state government mandates no coal and 100% green energy, then that’s what the utilities in that state have to do.


4 posted on 01/01/2025 3:54:47 PM PST by power2 (JMJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

The end of “fossil” fuels is the end of food.


5 posted on 01/01/2025 3:55:08 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That’s the idea.

Independence and prosperity.

It’s not hard.


6 posted on 01/01/2025 3:55:46 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The Green New Deal is moot n its goals until China has regime change.


7 posted on 01/01/2025 3:59:31 PM PST by Degaston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Climate Change is a cult to raise taxes and regs.


8 posted on 01/01/2025 3:59:43 PM PST by bray (It's not racist to be racist against races the DNC hates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Government by the people, for the people. What a concept!


9 posted on 01/01/2025 4:00:25 PM PST by maro (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

We are standing on an ocean of cheap fossil fuels which is what Communists fear.


10 posted on 01/01/2025 4:01:04 PM PST by bray (It's not racist to be racist against races the DNC hates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: power2

If states can ban gasoline powered cars and lawnmowers, gas ovens and water heaters in the name of “environmental protection”, then surely the federal government/Congress can ban bird- and whale-killing wind turbines, giant ecosystem-destroying solar farms and dangerously combustible electric vehicles on the same basis. Sauce for the goose and all that...


11 posted on 01/01/2025 4:05:17 PM PST by Orosius (“Wake America Up Again )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

By unleashing mining does that mean that people in Western NC are permanently gone from their homes aftwr what some was an intentional flood to get rid of those people once and for all?


12 posted on 01/01/2025 4:06:40 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Baadaa bing!


13 posted on 01/01/2025 4:21:25 PM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within ? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

And the DNC whores will say it was all thanks to Biden’s pro energy policies finally kicking in.


14 posted on 01/01/2025 4:24:24 PM PST by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Let it be so.


15 posted on 01/01/2025 4:25:12 PM PST by Skooz (Gabba Gabba accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Some info.

The world of oil is chock full of definition tweaking to get results desired. One such item is crude vs crude&condensate and then there is All Liquids.

There is a parameter called API, which is the American Petroleum Institute, but more relevant it is a number the describes specific gravity/density/viscosity of oil.

The lower the number, the more viscous the oil. And it used to be numbers above 35 were called condensate rather than crude because it was so low in density. Well, then shale oil arrived, with a high constituent yield of gasoline and not so high for diesel and kerosene(jet fuel). Next thing you know, API 40 and 45 liquid was filling the US storage in Cushing and quietly the definition of crude raised to 45.

This enabled quotes of barrels/day of what used to be something not oil . . . to be oil.

Regardless of all this, and without dwelling on competing graphs, the US has been pumping big numbers of oil for over 100 years. How long did we think it was going to last?

And to keep the idea rational, whoever was going to say “it’s being created every day!” go find some empty wells that were shut down and buy them. For nearly nothing. Then when they refill you’ll be hugely rich.

Ever notice nobody does this?


16 posted on 01/01/2025 4:25:28 PM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bray
We have lots of oil, but none left in the strategic reserve. Biden made sure of that.


17 posted on 01/01/2025 4:34:13 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: power2

“Trumps change in policies will help, but the States have jurisdiction on generating resource requirements. If a liberal state government mandates no coal and 100% green energy, then that’s what the utilities in that state have to do.”

Fine, let the states compete - some using abundant, inexpensive energy and others rationing scarce expensive energy. Let the voters decide which is preferred.


18 posted on 01/01/2025 4:48:17 PM PST by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: power2
If a liberal state government mandates no coal and 100% green energy, then that’s what the utilities in that state have to do.

GOOD! more for the rest of us then. :D
19 posted on 01/01/2025 8:49:41 PM PST by Chani (FRiendly Drive By poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Drill, baby! Drill! Warm, globe! Warm! Melt, ice caps! Melt! Hire idle poor to build dykes, pay them a living wage, and cut the welfare rolls as a result. Rising water levels means more fish, creating jobs in the fishing industry, and more protein in everyone’s diet. It’s all win/win/win/win/win!


20 posted on 01/02/2025 12:18:43 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David. Child in need of a CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson