Posted on 12/30/2024 7:24:54 PM PST by SeekAndFind
The election is over, Trump has been reelected, but the lawfare continues nonetheless. On Monday, a federal appeals court that must have been under the influence of some psychotropic drug upheld Trump’s liability for supposedly sexually abusing the partisan fantasist E. Jean Carroll in a Bloomingdale’s dressing room sometime in the 1990s. Carroll’s story has more holes than a slice of Swiss cheese that has been used for target practice, but despite lacking any evidence, she keeps winning in court — believe all women, doncha know, even the crazy mendacious ones. Trump’s team is going to keep on appealing, and that’s good. Maybe sanity will prevail at some point.
Fox News reported Monday that the appeals court’s is “a blow to the president-elect,” and leaves him “on the hook for the $5 million payout ordered by the jury.” An unnamed panel of three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which consists of 27 judges in all, issued an unsigned ruling claiming that Trump’s attorneys had not succeeded in establishing “that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings.” The Trump team "has not carried his burden to show that any claimed error or combination of claimed errors affected his substantial rights as required to warrant a new trial."
In the immortal words of Peter Lorre in the cinematic classic “All Through the Night,” “But that’s silly!” Back in Sept. 2024, the Post Millennial reported that Trump attorney Will Scharf, “speaking at Trump Tower in New York City after a hearing to ask to overturn the final verdict against Trump in the E Jean Carroll case,” pointed out quite correctly that the alleged victim’s story "at its heart is an utterly implausible, he said she said story.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
America courts are the Greatest Clown Shows on Earth. If you’re an American, Forget it. You always lose. ALWAYS.
E. Jean Carroll: “Your honor, it happened so long ago the state had to pass a special ex post facto bill of attainder to nullify the statute of limitation expiration, I don’t remember what year it happened, I didn’t file a police report, I have no corroborating witnesses or evidence of any kind.”
Judge Kaplan: “Guilty!”
3 DNC clown-stooges, guaranteed.
What the actual F????
Please tell me he has other avenues of appeal
# Title Judge Duty station Born Term of service Appointed by 66 Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston New York, NY 1959 2007–present 2020–present G.W. Bush 69 Circuit Judge Raymond Lohier New York, NY 1965 2010–present — — Obama 72 Circuit Judge Richard J. Sullivan New York, NY 1964 2018–present — — Trump 73 Circuit Judge Joseph F. Bianco Central Islip 1966 2019–present — — Trump 74 Circuit Judge Michael H. Park New York, NY 1976 2019–present — — Trump 75 Circuit Judge William J. Nardini New Haven, CT 1969 2019–present — — Trump 76 Circuit Judge Steven Menashi New York, NY 1979 2019–present — — Trump 77 Circuit Judge Eunice C. Lee New York, NY 1970 2021–present — — Biden 78 Circuit Judge Beth Robinson Burlington, VT 1965 2021–present — — Biden 79 Circuit Judge Myrna Pérez New York, NY 1974 2021–present — — Biden 80 Circuit Judge Alison Nathan New York, NY 1972 2022–present — — Biden 81 Circuit Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam Bridgeport, CT 1971 2022–present — — Biden 82 Circuit Judge Maria Araújo Kahn New Haven, CT 1964 2023–present — — Biden 41 Senior Circuit Jon O. Newman Hartford, CT 1932 1979–1997 1993–1997 1997–present Carter 42 Senior Circuit Amalya Kearse New York, NY 1937 1979–2002 — 2002–present Carter 50 Senior Circuit John M. Walker Jr. New Haven, CT 1940 1989–2006 2000–2006 2006–present G.H.W. Bush 52 Senior Circuit Dennis Jacobs New York, NY 1944 1992–2019 2006–2013 2019–present G.H.W. Bush 53 Senior Circuit Pierre N. Leval New York, NY 1936 1993–2002 — 2002–present Clinton 54 Senior Circuit Guido Calabresi New Haven, CT 1932 1994–2009 — 2009–present Clinton 55 Senior Circuit José A. Cabranes New Haven, CT 1940 1994–2023 — 2023–present Clinton 59 Senior Circuit Robert D. Sack New York, NY 1939 1998–2009 — 2009–present Clinton 62 Senior Circuit Barrington D Parker Jr. New York, NY 1944 2001–2009 — 2009–present G.W. Bush 63 Senior Circuit Reena Raggi Brooklyn, NY 1951 2002–2018 — 2018–present G.W. Bush 64 Senior Circuit Richard C. Wesley Geneseo, NY 1949 2003–2016 — 2016–present G.W. Bush 67 Senior Circuit Gerard E. Lynch New York, NY 1951 2009–2016 — 2016–present Obama 68 Senior Circuit Denny Chin New York, NY 1954 2010–2021 — 2021–present Obama 70 Senior Circuit Susan L. Carney New Haven, CT 1951 2011–2022 — 2022–present Obama
Only if he gets a friendly NY Governor. Since this isn’t a Constitutional issue, he probably has no avenues other than her to die.
This entire lawsuit is literally a law fare joke.
And E.Jean Carrol is a lunatic clown.
"An unnamed panel of three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, ... issued an unsigned ruling"
Brave.
The Second Circus BidenStooges really stepped up to the "transparency" plate with this one.
If only some hackers could figure out how to make fatso Reid’s wealth vanish for good.
And she’s a lunatic with a history of accusing people of sexual abuse who is being bankrolled by a disciple of Schwartz Gyorgy.
“America courts are the Greatest Clown Shows on Earth.
“An unnamed panel of three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, ... issued an unsigned ruling”
Brave.
The Second Circus BidenStooges really stepped up to the “transparency” plate with this one.”
___________________________________________________________
Trump’s lawyers can ask for a rehearing by the entire court (En banc). If that isn’t successful, he can appeal to the US Supreme Court. Who knows whether that court would even take up the case now.
Oh, Good Lord, "Bob Wills is still the DU troll".
You can't read?
“Trump’s lawyers can ask for a rehearing by the entire court (En banc).
Oh, Good Lord, “Bob Wills is still the DU troll”.
You can’t read?”
____________________________________________________________
I have no idea what you’re talking about, but I do know appellate procedure. The same event is part of Trump’s state appeal, so any sane federal court will wait for a final decision on the NY case.
I literally fill in the blanks on 98% of the Article III federal judge article postings on FR, and have done so for YEARS.
You've been here under this screen name for 9 months.
I agree that you have no idea about what's going on other than your attempt to troll on this subject.
Just about all of the trumped up ( no pun necessarily intended ) political charges against Trump are lawfare. They can’t even win when they try to stack the deck.
“Only if he gets a friendly NY Governor.”
This was federal court: “An unnamed panel of three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit”
The question I have is why they don’t appeal using the Eighth Amendment excessive fines clause.
I heard a quote one time that made a lot of sense. It was something like.” we have a legal system, but we don’t have a justice system.”
I agree with whoever said that
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.