Posted on 11/26/2024 9:35:14 AM PST by george76
Democrats long ago became convinced that the January 6, 2021, Capitol "insurrection," coupled with desperate attempts to convince a majority of Americans that President-elect Donald Trump is the second coming of Adolf Hitler, or at least a "fascist," and that Trump loyalists are white-supremacist "Nazis," would virtually guarantee Democrat succession of Democrat of President Joe Biden.
Boy, oh boy, how wrong and misguided they were.
The House January 6 Committee Report..
As described by George Washington University Law School Professor Jonathan Turl(''):
Whether you refer to that day as a riot or an insurrection puts you on one side or the other of a giant political chasm. I viewed the attack on that day as a desecration of our constitutional process, but I did not view it as an insurrection. I still don’t.
[...]
With Donald Trump set to return to the White House in 2025, it is astonishing how much of that day remains a matter of intense debate. Those divisions are likely only to deepen after a slew of recent reports that have challenged the selective release of information from the House January 6 Committee.
And that's exactly what's happening; the credibility of both the committee's "investigation" and final report continue to lose credibility.
...
Incidentally, even a Washington Post-University of Maryland poll found that almost half of the public — 43 percent — believed that “too much is being made” of the episode and that it is “time to move on.” Turley explained why he believes the percentage of Americans "ready to move on" from January 6 continues to grow.
The continued distrust of the official accounts of Jan. 6 reflects a failure of the House Democrats, and specifically former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), to guarantee a credible and comprehensive investigation.
The House Select Committee to investigate January 6 was comprised of Democrat-selected members who offered only one possible view: that January 6 was an attempt to overthrow our democracy by Trump and his supporters.
The committee hired a former ABC News producer to create a slick, made-for-television production that barred opposing views and countervailing evidence. The members, including Republican Vice Chair Liz Cheney, played edited videotapes of Trump’s speech that removed the portion where Trump called on his supporters to protest “peacefully.”
The committee fostered false accounts, including the claim that there was a violent episode with Trump trying to wrestle control of the presidential limousine. The Committee knew that the key Secret Service driver directly contradicted that account offered by former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson.
Simply, House Democrats, along with disgruntled (now former) Republican Reps. Liz Cheney (WY) and Adam Kinzinger (IL), predetermined the conclusions that their kangaroo court would come to, and they set about constructing "evidence" and interviewing "witnesses" to support their conclusions.
The Lack of Security Measures..
Along with most objective observers with even a modicum of knowledge of the facts as they occurred on January 6, Turley was also puzzled.
After all, there had been a violent riot at the White House before January 6, in which more officers were injured and Trump had to be moved to a secure location. The National Guard had to be called out to protect the White House, but those same measures (including a fence) were not ordered at the Capitol.
Two of the recent reports offered new details related to those questions.
One report confirmed that Trump did, in fact, offer the deployment of the National Guard in anticipation of the protest. The Jan. 6 Committee repeatedly dismissed this claim. After all, it would be a rather curious attempt at an insurrection if Trump was suggesting the use of thousands of troops to prevent any breach of Congress.
The committee specifically found “no evidence” that the Trump administration called for 10,000 National Guard members to be sent to Washington, D.C., to protect the Capitol. The Washington Post even supposedly “debunked” Trump’s comments with an award of “Four Pinocchios.”
Yet evidence now shows that Trump personally suggested the deployment of 10,000 National Guard troops to prevent violence. For example, a transcript includes the testimony of former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato in January 2022 with Liz Cheney present. Ornato states that he clearly recalled Trump’s offer of 10,000 troops.
Videotapes have also emerged showing Pelosi privately admitting that she and Democratic leadership were responsible for the security failure on Jan. 6.
Moreover, the House is under scrutiny this week for new information on the shooting death of Trump protester Ashli Babbitt by a Capitol Police officer.
As Turley correctly wrote, "an unjustified shooting of a protester would not fit the left-wing media narrative."
The concerns over the shooting were heightened by the Justice Department’s bizarre review and report, which notably did not state that the shooting was justified. Instead, it declared that it could not prove “a bad purpose to disregard the law” and that “evidence that an officer acted out of fear, mistake, panic, misperception, negligence, or even poor judgment cannot establish the high level of intent.”
Legal gobbledygook from the Justice Department.
The Bottom Line..
It's long past time for the January 6 committee nonsense to be dead and buried. It was from the beginning — most notably, the Democrats' attempt to convince America that it was a bona fide insurrection — a farce, dog and pony show, kangaroo court, or whatever. This country is about to finally discard all remnants of the miserable for years under the Biden-Harris administration and start making itself great again.
bkmk
never forget the reason for the left’s treason, a peaceful protest to protect election integrity.
https://rumble.com/v181401-january-6th-rally-2021.html
Jonathan Turl(’’)
What happens when the President of the United States, the man who holds the office where the authority of the FBI and DOJ Inspector General is derived from, gets the copy of the IG Horowitz report that details how many Feds and Fed assets were in the Capitol that day.
The assets that neither Wray nor Horowitz would talk about, hiding behind “it’s an ongoing investigation excuse, and give the details.
Its almost like an evil plot or something. Even mentioning the event could make one a possible collaborator. Lucky for aur speedy trials........oh! As we’ve become aware, more than Ashley died at the hands of leo that day.
4 is spelt four;-)
Spelt is spelled “flour”
bttt
The first one to sing gets the deal. The rest get Guantanamo Bay.
ICWYDT.
“Boy, oh boy, how wrong and misguided they were.“
Totally incorrect statement.
They were 100% right as it relates to mass brainwashing to effect a political outcome. The only other thing they could have done was try to kill hi… oh wait.
There was nothing misguided about it. Instead it was pure evil.
It’s just some on our side like this author (AI technician) are still unable to grasp what the left truly is.
INSURECTION or RIOT -——!?!
.
Neither!
It was a Peaceful demonstration which was
Hijacked by ‘DS’ Goons.
What’s That Say ???
I’ve posted this before about a “hero” of J6 who was demonstrably acting, to set up and harm a group of people threatening no one.
Everything the Democrats, Never Trumpers and Deep State have said about J6 is a lie if any of it can be shown to have been an organized deception on behalf of those who are now in power. I call shenanagans!
What I have been posting is this :
They are making this guy out to be a J6 hero..
.
Look at this video but first carefully look at the still image they display before you start the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxd_AnpUuMo
This is the officer who was involved in a staged photo shoot, an actor playing a role.
Earlier I had seen a video, months ago, of this event here and let me tell you what I saw before you look at the opening still and then at the video.
In the unedited video he begins it by leading a group of people through the capitol building.
He leads this group to the very intersection that you see.
When he gets there he turns to face those he had been leading and here you can see that he has his hand on his gun and someone in the group has his hands up.
Now, look at the intersection behind him. On the ground is a nightstick, clearly visible. On one side are some stairs and on the other are some doors that are not yet visible.
Seconds after this still from the video was captured he will pick up the nightstick laying on the ground behind him in the still and a photographer will step around the corner from the door opposite the stairs and start taking pictures.
Then he will “retreat” up the stairs, and in the video I saw months ago you can tell this is very deliberate as he poses several times while brandishing the nightstick as he goes up the stairs ... all while being filmed.
The whole thing was a carefully choreographed set up, acting ... and they are obviously very content to ruin the lives of those he had been leading up till the whole video shoot began.
When you watch the video as they have edited it you can even see where he had just picked up the nightstick that they had left for him, right where he was doubtlessly told it would be.
I wonder how much he got paid to deliberately help ruin those folks’ lives? Same with the cameramen too.
Those pushing the J6 narrative are all liars.
These are the people the Left adores.
And then the committee had the chutzpah to destroy any documents or testimony controverting anything less than their committees predetermined outcome.
Since those reports, testimonies, and films were produced on the tax-payers dime, at great expense,
they should be charged with destroying government property.
Also, given the illegality of that biased series of reports, the participants should be required to pay back the government for that charade of fictional justice, personally.
The best way to be heard by Congress: Courtesy Jane Long
<><>call them out by name on X
<><>copy all Trump/MAGA associates
<><>attach any relevant links/URLs/etc.
Message: Tilted Irish Kilt pointed out the J6 committee set about constructing “evidence” and interviewing “witnesses” to support their conclusions..”
And then destroyed any documents or testimony controverting anything less than their committees predetermined outcome.
Since those reports, testimonies, and films were produced on the tax-payers dime, at great expense, they should be charged with destroying government property.
Also, given the illegality of that biased series of reports, the participants should be required to pay back the government for that charade of fictional justice, personally.
The sham of a Jan 6th committee should be in jail, charged with conspiracy & treason. Tried, then hanged.
I have been praying for the ‘insurrectionists’ from Day One.
President Trump has a LOT on his plate for his first day in office. I’m betting getting those still in jail OUT is right up there at the top!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.