Skip to comments.
Judge makes ruling in case that decides fate of San Jose State’s transgender volleyball controversy
New York Post ^
| Nov 25, 2024
| Jenna Lemoncelli
Posted on 11/26/2024 3:40:24 AM PST by where's_the_Outrage?
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Neither the Post nor ESPN will “name” the player, despite his being over 18.
To: TwelveOfTwenty
Bob Dole would like to know
42
posted on
11/26/2024 6:16:43 AM PST
by
38special
(The government is ruining our country!)
To: Oscar in Batangas
43
posted on
11/26/2024 6:18:03 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Opposing Real Women’s teams should and will boycott playing against a man.
He is physically dangerous to them.
44
posted on
11/26/2024 6:27:51 AM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(NOT TIRED OF WINNING!)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
From the article: “San José State University will continue to support its student-athletes and reject discrimination in all forms . . .”
The dictionary definition of the verb “discriminate”
1). make an unjust or prejudicial distinction in the treatment of different categories of people, especially on the grounds of ethnicity, sex, age, or disability
2) recognize a distinction; differentiate
By the second definition, every university (including SJS) that has separate men’s and women’s athletic teams is engaging in discrimination (and that’s discrimination in a good and rational form, if we’re going to talk about “all forms”).
By the first definition, a judgment as to whether a school that excludes an individual from a women’s team because he has XY chromosomes is unjust will vary from person to person depending on their beliefs in the realms of politics, sociology and science, among other things. It seems clear from the actions of the other teams in the conference that the majority of those involved do not find that course of action unjust and thus discriminatory in that sense.
45
posted on
11/26/2024 7:25:20 AM PST
by
Stosh
To: dfwgator
Completely justifiable as long as Billy ‘identifies’ as an 8-year-old (and Adam Sandler can certainly do a good 8-year-old),
46
posted on
11/26/2024 7:34:52 AM PST
by
Stosh
To: All
I have an answer to the entire men in women's sports issue that I think can work for all sides. HIGH HEELS. Let me explain. To mitigate the inherent biological advantage a male (or we can concede the term "male at birth" to make them happy), we can mandate that all males who wish to participate in female sports must do so in high heels.
Softball - High Heels
Volleyball - High Heels
Track - High Heels
Downhill Skiing - High Heels
This would allow men to participate alongside women AND make women's sports more entertaining for all! I mean...I'd watch it. Thoughts?
To: SaveFerris
Yes...... now that’s the ticket!!
48
posted on
11/26/2024 8:12:44 AM PST
by
bert
( (KE. NP. +12) Where is ZORRO when California so desperately needs him?)
To: spincaster
PRETTY SURE YOU ARE RIGHT
49
posted on
11/26/2024 8:30:21 AM PST
by
ridesthemiles
(not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
To: bert
50
posted on
11/26/2024 10:23:14 AM PST
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
To: mmichaels1970
You may be onto something...
51
posted on
11/26/2024 11:22:20 AM PST
by
HKMk23
(https://youtu.be/LTseTg48568)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson