Posted on 11/14/2024 10:01:09 AM PST by Libloather
WASHINGTON — House Republicans are demanding more information from the FBI about its use of “software tools” to seek out election-related speech on social media after a bureau analyst mentioned their use during a recent deposition — before being barred from saying any more by FBI lawyers.
House Judiciary Committee chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) told FBI Director Christopher Wray Tuesday to hand over the information as President-elect Donald Trump’s looming return to office creates uncertainty for Wray’s future employment.
“In a transcribed interview… on October 23, 2024, an FBI Criminal Investigative Division Analyst previously assigned to the [Foreign Influence Task Force] disclosed that the FITF uses ‘software tools where [the FBI can] search open-source databases about content indicative of criminal conduct’,” Jordan wrote to Wray in a letter obtained by The Post.
Although the material was described as “open-source,” the search tools are suspected to have been developed in-house.
It’s unclear what social media sites are included in the search or how the information is compiled.
“According to the analyst’s testimony, the FBI uses this tool to monitor social media posts by users, regardless of whether the users are American citizens or foreign actors, to search for ‘content indicative of criminal conduct,'” Jordan wrote.
“The analyst further testified that the FBI shares its findings, such as the specific ‘user name and the content’ of the posts, with social media companies to censor such content accordingly.”
Jordan wrote that “[a]lthough the analyst testified that the FBI uses this tool to pursue ‘criminal conduct,’ when questioned about the nature of the software tool and the scope of the FBI’s use of it, agency counsel repeatedly prevented the analyst from fully answering the Committee’s questions.
“Therefore, we write to obtain additional information in order to understand whether the FBI has or could...
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
No, no no, do not make any further requests from scumbag Wray, he needs to be focused on packing his shi+ for his immenent departure.
After that, he’ll have all the time in the world to focus on requests, subpoenas, testimony, etc.
Usually, when I criticize the FBI here, someone rushes to tell me about the overwhelming majority of agents who are good. If those agents are so good, why did they keep silent in the face of all this?
The FBI needs to be burned to the ground.
The new FBI mantra: “Show me the man and I will show you the crime.”
Remind me about the FISA Court and having to get a warrant to spy on American citizens and only then if they are being contacted by foreign agents.
Perhaps some penalties for violating this law need to be imposed on various intelligence agencies, such as the FBI. May I suggest jail time, immediate termination of job, permanent being barred from federal employment, loss of pension, and oh yes a very public trial.
He needs to be set up in a perjury trap or a contempt trap. He should be very familiar with the tactics. He’s destroyed hundreds of lives using the same schemes.
EC
They must have had a field day here.
The Machine
I’m only here for the Uranus threads anyway.
Trump made opposing online censorship a major issue in the presidential campaign — after he was banned from most mainstream social media websites after the Jan. 6, 2021, riot in which his supporters stormed the Capitol to disrupt the electoral vote count.
“Within hours of my inauguration, I will sign an executive order banning any federal department or agency from colluding with any organization, business, or person, to censor, limit, categorize, or impede the lawful speech of American citizens,” Trump said in a December 2022 policy statement.
“I will then ban federal money from being used to label domestic speech as ‘mis-‘ or ‘dis-information’. And I will begin the process of identifying and firing every federal bureaucrat who has engaged in domestic censorship — directly or indirectly — whether they are the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Health and Human Services, the FBI, the DOJ, no matter who they are.”
The FBI confirmed to The Post that it received the letter and declined to comment.
but the did get the letter.
You really shouldn't post that...
My wife has a conservative friend that now works as an FBI agent. This person was a stay-at-home military wife. Once her kids left home she joined the FBI. She’s “on our side” but not willing to stand up for the truth. I told my wife, even if it hurts her friend, all of them need to go.
“She’s “on our side” but not willing to stand up for the truth..”
Then she’s not on our side.
Period.
L
I don’t disagree.
‘content indicative of criminal conduct,’
Like “Harris is an empty headed moron who blew her way to the top”?
Good thing I am quoting others and never said that myself.
Or broken into a million pieces. Their worthwhile functions could be transferred to the U.S. Marshall’s Service, just for an example.
I wonder how many FReepers made the cut here?
1775; The federal government is forbidden to impose their will on my freedom but here we are in 2024 and the gigantic government is involved in every aspect of my life.
Special Agents of the FBI (or whatever organization replaces it) should not be armed. Their standard investigative duties should not require weapons.
Activities that do require weapons should require armed escort by U.S Marshalls or the Federal Protective Service.
The same principle should be applied to most of the 80+ other Federal agencies who maintain armed staff. There is no way the IRS or NOAA staff should be carrying weapons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.