Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steve Bannon Warns of Potential Third Donald Trump Impeachment
Newsweak ^

Posted on 11/09/2024 7:54:31 AM PST by TigerClaws

Democrats will move to impeach President-elect Donald Trump for a third time if they have control of the U.S. House of Representatives after the 2026 midterm election, former Trump adviser Steve Bannon warned on Friday.

Trump was elected to a second term in a decisive victory against Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee, earlier this week. While Republicans also took control of the U.S. Senate, the status of the House remains up in the air, although the GOP currently looks favored to retain its grip on the chamber.

However, Democrats may have a better chance of capturing control of the House in the 2026 midterms even if they come up short this year. The party that controls the presidency typically loses House seats in midterm elections and the chamber is all but certain to be closely divided in 2026.

During his first stint in the White House, Trump was twice impeached by the Democrat-controlled House, the first time in 2019 over his alleged attempt to pressure Ukraine to investigate then-candidate Joe Biden and the second in January 2021 over his role in the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. He was acquitted by the Senate in both cases.

Bannon, who served as White House chief strategist in the early months of the first Trump administration, warned during an episode of his War Room podcast on Friday ...

"Hakeem Jeffries could be, will be, the speaker of the House in two years," Bannon said. "And the first thing he will do in the early days of 2027 is move to impeach Donald Trump. Trust me. They're gonna put $10 billion in back of him. They have nobody else."

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 11/09/2024 7:54:31 AM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

ThreePeet! Go ahead. Make his day.


2 posted on 11/09/2024 7:55:52 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Have the ballot counters in Maricopa County and Las Vegas sobered up yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Weaponizing government.

The Democrats believe in this very strongly.

Let’s show them how much we’ve learned from them.


3 posted on 11/09/2024 8:02:36 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (My decisions about people are based almost entirely on skin color. I learned this from Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
I'm pretty sure that Maxine Waters, reminiscent of Trump's last inauguration, will soon be in front of the cameras, screeching,

"Imbeach poty seben! Imbeach poty seben!

4 posted on 11/09/2024 8:05:36 AM PST by Thommas (The snout of the camel is already under the tent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

$10B is total bunk. It was huge that Kamala reportedly just spent $1B. And short of real crime, the Senate would never convict anyway.

Bannon is full of it and was using this as an excuse for Trump to lard up his cabinet and admin with neocon Deep Staters.


5 posted on 11/09/2024 8:06:00 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I can’t imagine Rs wont do better in 2026, not worse.

By then the country will be rockign and rolling


6 posted on 11/09/2024 8:06:20 AM PST by dp0622 (Tried a coup, a fake tax story, tramp slander, Russia nonsense, impeachment and a virus. They lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

7 posted on 11/09/2024 8:07:20 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Big difference, back then they had Pence, now we have Vance.

Do they really want President Vance?


8 posted on 11/09/2024 8:09:50 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
In that hypothetical scenario, it'll only help future presidential candidate JD Vance in 2028.

He'll be able to point out on how the Democrats are weaponizing the government against their political enemies and we can't return the White House back in the hands of a Democratic Administration.

9 posted on 11/09/2024 8:10:36 AM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Bannon starts in here at 4:30 with the biggest load of horse dung I’ve ever heard him deliver—and that’s saying something:

https://rumble.com/v5n7uvt-steve-bannon-explains-how-the-trump-transition-team-can-confront-the-admini.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp


10 posted on 11/09/2024 8:13:31 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

If they do, I hope the first article of impeachement is that he DEPORTED million of illegals.


11 posted on 11/09/2024 8:14:20 AM PST by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Do they really want President Vance?

They may not.....but I sure wouldn't mind Vance!

Go ahead. Make my day!

12 posted on 11/09/2024 8:14:38 AM PST by icclearly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I’m not predicting anything, but I think the use of lawfare and impeachment proceedings against Trump is going to quietly disappear as a political tactic. And the reason for this is simple: Not only did it fail, it made him stronger and more popular in 2024 than he was in 2016.
13 posted on 11/09/2024 8:16:02 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Well, maybe I'm a little rough around the edges; inside a little hollow.” -- Tom Petty, “Rebels”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I think you say stuff like this until you get in office and then lower the BOOM.

Fire ALL and make them explain what they do and why they should get their jobs back. Musk will do it. What he did with X.


14 posted on 11/09/2024 8:19:20 AM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

They wont because of historical trends, what happens is the winning party gets lazy in the ballot box.

People don’t turn out to vote because they are drunk on victory. This always happens.


15 posted on 11/09/2024 8:20:30 AM PST by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Not if you let the neon globalist uniparty back into the admin.


16 posted on 11/09/2024 8:27:00 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; All

Yes, but now it will be for a different but unstated reason. It will be done to waste time. Historically a Prez has 18 months to set and implement his/her agenda meaning legislation. Anything that delays that increases the likelihood he/she gets nothing done. Grist for the future political mill!


17 posted on 11/09/2024 8:28:10 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Reily
If the Democrats control the House, then President Trump isn’t getting any part of his agenda passed in Congress.

He would have a hard time getting anything passed even if Republicans had wide margins in both houses of Congress.

18 posted on 11/09/2024 8:32:54 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Well, maybe I'm a little rough around the edges; inside a little hollow.” -- Tom Petty, “Rebels”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bayard
They wont because of historical trends, what happens is the winning party gets lazy in the ballot box.

People don’t turn out to vote because they are drunk on victory. This always happens.

Not always. It did not happen in 1934. Roosevelt's Democratic party took the House from the Republicans and increased Democrats in the Senate by eight.

In a realighnment government, it is quite possible to increase the Republican's control of the House and the Control of the Senate.

The old dominant Progressive media will have less power. Facebook and Google will probably be less overt in their support for Democrats. The economy will probably be in better shape.

19 posted on 11/09/2024 8:34:35 AM PST by marktwain (The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Big difference, back then they had Pence, now we have Vance. Do they really want President Vance?

Impeachment these days aren't so much used to throw out the president. The Senate would have to flip completely to the Democrats favor in 2026 at that point and the Senate map looks crappy for the D's that cycle. The liklihood of having the Senate on their side to toss Trump would be miniscule.

That being said, impeachment now is just a tax-payer funded tool to weaken the executive by the opposing party before the upcoming elections to help their own party.

20 posted on 11/09/2024 8:35:17 AM PST by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson