Posted on 10/30/2024 11:15:42 AM PDT by SJackson
They can't handle truth.
Have you ever heard of Howard Lutnick? You most likely will soon.
Howard W. Lutnick is the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, the venerable financial services firm. He was one of the lesser-noted speakers at Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally on Sunday — you know, the one where, if you believe MSNBC, jackbooted Trump supporters were goose-stepping around and shouting “Sieg heil!” in terrifying unison when a Charlie Chaplin-mustachioed Trump appeared and gave them the straight-arm salute.
While all that is lurid fantasy and the left’s latest shameless smear of the Bad Orange Man, Lutnick really did appear at the rally, and some leftists are using something he said there to try to stir up their cadres to hate Trump even more than they did already (as if that were possible).
The recasting of the mild-mannered Lutnick as a dangerous right-wing extremist comes to us courtesy of the New Republic, a publication that many people don’t realize still exists, but which is still churning out primo Trump-hate content for its tiny cadre of remaining readers.
The New Republic’s front page on Monday featured article after article designed to send a thrill of horror down the spine of the most fanatical Trump-hater: leftists can indulge in a veritable orgy of outrage toward and contempt for the Emmanuel Goldstein of our age with articles including, “Trump’s Ugly Racist Rally Finally Unmasks His Real Closing Argument”; “It’s Not Just Trump We Have to Fear Anymore”; “Trump’s Promise to Young Men: I Am Your Retribution Against Women”; “Trump Spirals After Michelle Obama Destroys Him in Blistering Speech”; and for those who are starting to worry about how this election seems to be going, a grim warning: “If You’re Being Fatalistic or Panicking, You Are Helping Donald Trump.”
Amid all this risible nonsense and hysterical fear-mongering, we get a particularly grim story: “Top Trump Aide Makes Terrifying Threat at Madison Square Garden Rally.” This is where Howard W. Lutnick comes in. “At Donald Trump’s rally in New York’s Madison Square Garden Sunday,” writes the New Republic’s Hafiz Rashid, “one speaker took a bigoted swipe at Muslims—and he holds an important position in the Trump campaign.”
Oh, heavens to betsy, a “bigoted swipe.” And at Muslims, no less — one of the left’s cherished victim groups. What did the dastardly Lutnick say? Did he call for mass deportations? Internment camps? A new “Muslim ban,” a fictional bogey that the left used to great effect to bedevil Trump’s first term?
None of the above. Lutnick, Rashid writes indignantly, is part of Trump’s transition team, and he “told the crowd why they should vote for the former president and, raising a fist, invoked Islamophobia. ‘So, the first thing: We must elect Donald J. Trump president because we must crush jihad,’ Lutnick shouted to cheers.”
“Crush jihad”? That’s it? That’s the terrifying threat to Muslims? If you’re of a certain age, you’ll remember that in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, we were told repeatedly that the vast majority of Muslims rejected terrorism, and that the terrorists were only a “tiny minority of extremists.” So what happened to that?
For Rashid, the problem is that Lutnick didn’t say “crush terrorism,” he said “crush jihad.” Rashid asserts that “Lutnick’s use of the word ‘jihad’ in this context is an allusion to bigoted views about Islam. The term is widely mistranslated as ‘holy war,’ when the literal Arabic translation is ‘to strive’ or ‘to struggle.’ In a religious context, the word is used to describe a person’s internal or external struggle to do good deeds.”
Yeah, no. Cantor Fitzgerald had offices in the World Trade Center; 658 of its employees were murdered on that day by men who explained that what they were doing was a jihad. In 2009, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his fellow 9/11 plotters wrote a long self-justificatory letter in which they stated: “Many thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.”
Times Square car bomb terrorist Faisal Shahzad explained, “Jihad, holy fighting in Allah’s course, with full force of numbers and weaponry, is given the utmost importance in Islam….By jihad, Islam is established….By abandoning jihad, may Allah protect us from that, Islam is destroyed, and Muslims go into inferior position, their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligation and duty in Islam on every Muslim.” Innumerable other Islamic terrorists worldwide have used the word jihad over the years to refer to their acts of violence.
Lutnick’s call to “crush jihad” is perfectly understandable, not just in light of the devastation of Cantor Fitzgerald on 9/11, but in light of ongoing jihad activity in the U.S. and worldwide. It’s remarkable that Hafiz Rashid and the New Republic still think they can fool people with this nonsense. But the American people have been hammered since 9/11 with false and misleading propaganda about how “Islam is a religion of peace,” so Rashid doesn’t have to work hard to get his point across.
In denouncing Lutnick’s words as “bigoted” and “Islamophobic,” Rashid is following a playbook that has been used innumerable times since 9/11 to marginalize and silence those who spoke the truth about what happened that day. It has worked quite well up until now; there is no reason why it can’t work again.
Related Threads
Report: ‘Free Gaza’ on Devices That Set Fire to Ballot Drop Boxes in Washington State
Bigoted view of muslims? How about jihad is a specifically muslim idea, force, and movement? I mean, I’ve never heard of a Christian, Hindu or Jewish jihad.
Rashid have a pager??? Asking for a friend.
Some Democrats want to join Jihad (in their dreams), and I kind of wish they would.
“word is used to describe a person’s internal or external struggle to do good deeds.” ......
Bulls4!T
New republic lost relevance decades ago. It is just an echo chamber now like the Atlantic.
For three weeks I’ve been hearing about “closing arguments”.
Now I know what a closing argument is in a court case, BUT . . .
In 14 prior presidential elections I can recall, I have no recollection of ever hearing about “closing arguments.”
Where did this come from?
Howard W. Lutnick, the Chairman and CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, has an estimated net worth of $1 billion as of 2024134. This significant wealth primarily stems from his 60% ownership stake in Cantor Fitzgerald and his involvement with other financial services firms13.
^^^^^ Another one of Trumps billionaire babies. Much of Wall Street is voting Trump this time around. Mainly? Because they have seen how awful Biden-Harris have been. They are scared to get more Kamela/commie Democrat idiocy and ineptitude. Dems are plain stupid and inept at running anything. From town dog catcher on up.
Been waiting for this ‘Crush Jihad’ comment.
All the pearl clutching over a joke from a comedian while this pearl was waiting to be clutched..
I imagine that is the part many folks would disagree with. (Not me - it makes sense.) Although many of them seem to have fought bravely for our country, so I don't know. I was surprised to read that in Israel there are numerous Arabs that are in the IDF. They put their nation (Israel) first.
“Where did this come from?”
Its likely the Harris campaign trying to capitalize on Kamala’s history as a district attorney.
It sounds better than “You want fries with that?”
Journalists overused the word atmospheric river and had to come up with fresh material.
I didn’t see the no Muslim to hold political office, but obviously that can’t happen, it’s a religious test which would violate the Constitution. If he did say it I’m surprised no one in the media made it an issue.
We teared up when he spoke.
Probably shouldn’t go there, dude. Bad idea.
The sooner the better disciple Paul. Anytime now.
I’m pretty sure that after he said “crush Jihad” he went on to say how no muslem should be allowed to hold a political office in the USA. Their own faith is against our Constitution - how can they faithfully serve the USA?
*******
If that is what was said, I see his point. The Islamic religion and the US Constitution are on a collision course with one another and to ignore or soft pedal that fact is to be dishonest.
Rashid asserts that: “The term is widely mistranslated as ‘holy war,” when the literal Arabic translation is ‘to strive’ or ‘to struggle.’
another translation ‘Mein Kampf’
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.