VIDEO: ILLEGAL "VOTERS" CUTTING THE LINE AGAIN

BREAKING: CO SoS @JenaGriswold caught leaking election passwords to the public. Griswold is the same official who wanted to make an example of Mesa County, CO Clerk Tina Peters for giving credentials to a forensic expert to make a forensic copy of election records in support of… pic.twitter.com/WVVT1vfcXr— Patrick Colbeck✝️ (@pjcolbeck) October 29, 2024

So much delusion here to believe we are going to out-vote the coming fraud.

At least take pictures. BFD I know but at least there will be documentation of how we let the Republic be stolen.

This is how they plan on stealing it this time.

In PA, people can wear party- or candidate-specific clothing? I think it’s illegal in most states.

Yep. Concur.

Just prancing in there, not worried about a damn thing.

If the citizens were to somehow grow a pair and handle the matter, rest assured the state would descend upon them with a fury normally reserved for the unrestricted battlefield.

Battle of Athens was effective against voting fraud. I believe honest people tried everything else before resorting to a more effective tactic. Just a real history lesson.

I sure hope Trump isn’t counting on PA to get him over the top.

Absolutely true. This is fast getting down to nut cutting. Fish or cut bait time very soon.

Thank you Little Miss Sunshine.

I’m not thinking kind thoughts.

PA Government is extremely corrupt in every way.

Illegals just doing what they were brought here to do. Why aren’t the Republicans screaming about this? Oh yeah, they’re useless.

Videos, we need videos.

Making things too easy for investigators. Time stamps on a bunch of votes all with foreign names makes it easier to pull their tickets for further scrutiny.

If you see something, say something has meaning and merit.

PA Government is extremely corrupt in every way.>>> Act 77 passed by republicans including Mastriano. orchestrated by Corbett.

Thank you for referencing that article TigerClaws.

"VIDEO: ILLEGAL "VOTERS" CUTTING THE LINE AGAIN"

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Before we consider major constitutional problems with illegal aliens voting, I understand that neither of Harris's parents were citizens when she was born. If such is the case, then she is not qualified to be either POTUS or VP imo.

What decided Harris's non-compliance with Constitution's Natural Born Citizen Clause (NBC) for me is this. The politically correct excuse to ignore NBC is that it is not defined in the Constitution even though it is defined in Law of Nations, international law at the time the Constitution was drafted.

But then a clarification of significance of Law of Nations to USA by first Supreme Court Chief Justice John Jay came to my attention, Jay officially noting that Law of Nations is as much a part of USA law as the Constitution is.

Excerpted from the writings of Chief Justice John Jay:

"That you may percieve more clearly the Extent and objects of your Inquiries, it may be proper to observe that the Laws of the united States admit of being classed under three Heads or³ Descriptions—
1^st. all Treaties made under the authority of the united States.
2^dly. The Laws of nations [emphasis added]—
3^dly. The Constitution, and Statutes of the united States—"
—John Jay’s Charge to the Grand Jury, the Circuit Court for the District of Virginia, 22 May 1793

Again, Harris is not constitutionally qualified to be either POTUS or VP imo.

Also, I think that the Trump Campaign is ready to deal with illegal aliens voting. Consider the following thread posted in August.

"But as autumn looms, Lara Trump, Republican National Committee co-chair (and daughter-in-law of the presidential nominee), says she is more than prepared to take on Vice President Kamala Harris — and has been for quite some time." —How Lara Trump and the GOP are preparing for war with Kamala Harris (8.23.24)

Next, from related threads concerning major constitutional problems (imo) with illegal aliens voting ...

Regarding non-citizens voting, desperate elite Democrats are wrongly demanding that the states nullify the Constitution's "Uniform Rule of Naturalization Clause" imo.

To begin with, the congressional record shows that post-Civil War lawmakers had expressed their concern that states who allow non-citizens to vote wrongly nullify that clause.

"Article I, Section 8, Clause 4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization [emphasis added], and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;"
" If the States can admit to the elective franchise those who are not citizens, thereby neutralizing the votes of citizens, not only the Federal power of naturalization becomes a nullity, but" * * * * "a minority of citizens by the aid of aliens may control the government of the States, and through the States the government of the Union [emphasis added]." —Appendix to the Congressional Globe, 1868. (See near middle of 1st column.)
" Whatever difference there may be as to what other rights appertain to a citizen, all must agree that he has the right to petition and also to claim the Protection of the Government. These belong to him as a member the body politic, and the possession of them is what separates citizens of the lowest condition from aliens and slaves. To suppose that a State can make an alien a citizen or confer on him the right of voting would involve the absurdity of giving him the direct and immediate control of the action of the General Government, from which he can claim no protection and to which he has no right to present a petition [emphasis added]." —Appendix to the Congressional Globe, 1868. (See bottom half of 1st column.)

Next, the Constitution's drafters gave the states, not the feds, the power to decide voter qualifications, evidenced by Article I, Section 2, Clause 1 (1.2.1).

"Article I, Section 2, Clause 1: The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature [emphasis added]."

Note that 1.2.1 gives state-qualified citizens the power to vote only for representatives, not senators or POTUS. But the states later gave ordinary citizen voters the power to vote for federal senators too.

And it remains that voters still don't have the express constitutional power to vote for POTUS any more than illegals do. The fact that we do vote for POTUS is deceptive smoke and mirrors by the corrupt, constitutionally undefined political parties, probably intended to make us deplorables think that we are in control of the Oval Office.

After all, constitutional drafters established the Electoral College to make sure that the right person is in the wartime Oval Office.

At the other extreme, the Electoral College is MAJOR OVERKILL for making sure that the right person is in the peacetime Oval Office to make sure that your mail is delivered promptly, the US Mail Service, let's also include militia readiness, being arguably most of the very few powers that the states have given to the feds to dictate domestic policy.

"Article I, Section 8, Clause 7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;"
"It is one of a few government agencies explicitly authorized by the Constitution of the United States." (non-FR)
The congressional record shows that Rep. John Bingham, a constitutional lawmaker, had clarified the federal government's constitutionally limited powers as follows.
”Simply this, that the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Constitution, is in the States and not in the federal government [emphases added]. I have sought to effect no change in that respect in the Constitution of the country.” —John Bingham, Congressional. Globe. 1866, page 1292 (see top half of third column)
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.

In other words, if a given federal social spending program is not reasonably related to the Mail Service, then you can bet that it is unconstitutional, based on stolen state powers, and win your bet probably most of the time.

And all that the corrupt political parties are trying to do, evidenced by all the mischief that Democrats are up to to keep the Oval Office, including allowing illegals to unconstitutionally vote, is to retain control of the state powers that the post-17th Amendment ratification feds have stolen from the states imo.

Also, when Virginia Minor claimed that her citizenship automatically gave her the right to vote under the 14th Amendment's Equal Protections Clause, the Supreme Court clarified in Minor v. Happersett (Minor) that citizenship doesn't guarantee the right to vote, Minor living in the "wrong" state which gets us back to 1.2.1 above.

In fact, the justices had referenced 1.2.1 in the Minor case opinion.

"The members of the House of Representatives are to be chosen by the people of the States, and the electors in each State must have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislature." —Minor v. Happersett, 1874.

Again, what we're seeing now is that desperate elite Democrats and RINOs are trying to gift illegal immigrants the right to vote in order to try to stay in power, a slap in the face to all voting citizens, but especially to women who had to work hard for their right to vote, evidenced by the 19th Amendment, pioneered in part by Virginia Minor's work.

"19th Amendment: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."

The bottom line concerning feds not supporting Texas, Virginia, Ohio, Florida, Alabama, any others, in removing noncitizen from their rolls is that the feds themselves are unconstitutionally interfering with a federal election imo, unthinkingly helping to nullify the Constitution's Uniform Rule of Naturalization Clause as much as renegade states are imo.

Regarding corrupt states allowing illegals to vote, also note that Section 2 of the 14th Amendment (14A), that amendment ratified shortly after the excerpts above appeared in the congressional record, is a penalty for states where ballot box fraud has occurred.

Especially consider the zero tolerance "hair trigger" wording in that section that should be a warning for any state thinking about rigging an election, letting non-citizens vote just one example of doing so imo.

Excerpted from 14A:

"But when the right to vote at any election"
"is denied to any"
"or in any way abridged,"
"Section 2: Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election [all emphases added] for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State." [Apportionment of Representatives]
"Section 5: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

In fact, consider that the post-Civil War congressional Republicans who drafted Section 2 made it to discourage Southern Democrats (my words) from rigging the ballot boxes that Democrats are now alleged to have done for 2020, 2022 and possibly earlier elections!

"Because slavery (except as punishment for crime) had been abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment, the freed slaves would henceforth be given full weight for purposes of apportionment. This situation was a concern to the Republican leadership of Congress, who worried that it would increase the political power of the former slave states, even as such states continued to deny freed slaves the right to vote." —Apportionment of Representatives

Also, in addition to trying to tap the illegal votes of illegal aliens to try to stay in power, desperate elite Democrats recently unilaterally threw out 14+ million primary votes for Biden after his bad interview with Trump, giving Biden's votes to presidentially unqualified (imo) Harris, and need to be held responsible for violating Section 2 imo.

Consider that if this were a better world, the feds would be reminding all states before an election that the feds will be darkening the doorway of any state to investigate allegations of possible violations of constitutional voting integrity protections, including policing elections for violations of the Uniform Rule of Naturalization Clause.

But even with Section 2's zero tolerance wording, Pence and the J6 Congress still wrongly ignored allegations of vote-counting fraud imo.

Since Congress and renegade states have repeatedly proven that they are enemies of the people imo, it is now up to Democratic and Republican Trump supporters to effectively "impeach and remove" ALL (exceptions?) state and federal lawmakers and executives in November.

In fact, it's up to us Trump supporters to take the first MAJOR step in draining the swamp by supporting hopeful Trump 47 with a new, Constitution-respecting Congress, new state lawmakers too, not only so that he will not be a lame duck president from the first day of his second term, but will support him to quickly finish draining the swamp, including getting compromised judges off of the bench.

Finally, let's not allow the anti-Trump media try to fade our memories of what we witnessed on July 13.

Def can’t go near a polling place with any kind of political gear in MA.

FYI, I have been looking at this on X and I am skeptical.

It is going to clarify itself. I recommend letting it.

Crap is happening but this seems implausibly brazen.

Everyone is going crazy over what is basically a story.

There is more than one video and the second one was of a man talking about it. It is more obscure and Ann the promoter did not post that at least at first.

The original post indicated there were “three buses full” of people.

The man who described the situation stated that it was about 12 people, quite a difference. The original video showed more people than 12 but still not even one bus full.

His objection was that they seemed foreign and were not speaking English.

Crap we have “not speaking English” in Texas, and it is not Spanish, there are German only towns, Czech only towns, and more, and in many those people are citizens for years. Pennsylvania has plenty of foreign speaking citizen groups that may need an interpreter, so they all go together on a bus.

I do think it is crap if they jumped in line in front of others waiting. That may be clarified also.

So who knows, stay pissed, stay vigilant, but use common sense and don’t give ammunition to Democrat idiots looking to tell people that one overreach means nothing we say is true.