Skip to comments.
Giant catapult defies gravity by launching satellites into orbit without the need of rocket fuel
Brighter Side News ^
| 10/21/2024
| Joseph Shavit
Posted on 10/21/2024 11:52:29 AM PDT by TexasKamaAina
This technology aims to revolutionize the way satellites are sent into space, using a giant rotating arm to fling satellites into low Earth orbit.
(Excerpt) Read more at thebrighterside.news ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: satellites
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
Slingshots vs rockets
To: TexasKamaAina
As long as your satellite isn’t fragile, which all satellites are.
2
posted on
10/21/2024 11:55:07 AM PDT
by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
To: TexasKamaAina
Just wait until the muzzies get ahold of this tech.
3
posted on
10/21/2024 11:55:34 AM PDT
by
MeanWestTexan
(Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
To: TexasKamaAina
4
posted on
10/21/2024 12:00:16 PM PDT
by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: TexasKamaAina
Would make for a great ride at the State Fair.
5
posted on
10/21/2024 12:00:54 PM PDT
by
ComputerGuy
(Heavily-medicated for your protection)
To: TexasKamaAina
Did Wile E. Coyote open an Acme catalog again?
To: blackdog
***As long as your satellite isn’t fragile, which all satellites are.***
Yep. The first first thing I thought about was Jules Vern’s book “From earth to the Moon”. The three occupants of the projectile would’ve been smashed to a pulp when fired out of the cannon. But in Vern’s time, a cannon was the strongest form of propulsion known. A rocket provides gradual acceleration. A slingshot does not.
To: TexasKamaAina
ha.... a takeoff on Heilein’s “Moon is a Harsh Mistress” where ore rocks from the moon were EM sled-launched to earth to splash down in shallow ocean areas...
As far as the catapult concept goes, an EM rail-launcher makes more sense.
8
posted on
10/21/2024 12:04:46 PM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: TexasKamaAina
"Giant catapult defies gravity by launching satellites into orbit without the need of rocket fuel"
wow, who knew:
9
posted on
10/21/2024 12:05:40 PM PDT
by
catnipman
((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
To: Right Brother
Wouldn’t it depend on how rapidly it gets wound up?
It’s basically spinning until it hits Mach 6 and releases.
Be a heck of a lot of centrifugal (or the opposite one, can’t remember the spelling) force, though.
10
posted on
10/21/2024 12:06:42 PM PDT
by
TheThirdRuffian
(Orange is the new brown in)
To: TexasKamaAina
Wasn’t there a Three Stooges episode featuring such a contraption?
To: Resolute Conservative
12
posted on
10/21/2024 12:07:23 PM PDT
by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: blackdog
As long as the rate of acceleration is low, satellite fragility shouldn’t matter. I’m more interested in deceleration when the thing is launched and the resulting wind resistance. If it’s launched in an aerodynamic capsule, maybe this launching tech is feasible. It’s an interesting concept to be sure.
13
posted on
10/21/2024 12:07:49 PM PDT
by
CitizenUSA
(Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.)
To: Magnum44
Be vewy vewy quiet. I’m huntin’ wabbitts.
14
posted on
10/21/2024 12:09:09 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(I've come to the conclusion that the world is made up of millions of Three Stooges comedians.)
To: Right Brother
There you go with that physixy stuff. We’ve moved past that. We even have an app on our phones. “SpaceApp”. Those two astronauts love it so much they won’t come home.
15
posted on
10/21/2024 12:09:20 PM PDT
by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
To: blackdog
As long as your satellite isn’t fragile, which all satellites are.
Perhaps a stupid question, would it work as an earth-based variation of ‘Rods from God’?
16
posted on
10/21/2024 12:11:18 PM PDT
by
hanamizu
( )
To: CitizenUSA
17
posted on
10/21/2024 12:12:00 PM PDT
by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
To: TexasKamaAina
It actually is very workable because the acceleration is gradual. The arm slowly oges faster and faster, reducing G forces on the object to be launched. Once the arm is rotating at launch speed, then the object is let go.
18
posted on
10/21/2024 12:12:36 PM PDT
by
wbarmy
(Trying to do better.)
To: hanamizu
19
posted on
10/21/2024 12:18:04 PM PDT
by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
To: wbarmy
Uhm......the centrifugal forces are just as destructive in our sea level atmosphere. You can’t cheat physics my friend.
20
posted on
10/21/2024 12:20:00 PM PDT
by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson