Posted on 10/18/2024 8:15:55 AM PDT by EBH
3.3. LEVELS OF AUTHORITY. Subject to Paragraph 3.1., Defense Intelligence Components may provide personnel to assist a Federal department or agency, including a Federal law enforcement agency, or a State or local law enforcement agency when lives are in danger, in response to a request for such assistance, in accordance with the following approval authorities:
a. Secretary of Defense Approval. (1) The Secretary of Defense may approve any type of requested permissible assistance described in Paragraph 3.2.
(2) The decision to approve requests for these types of permissible assistance described in Paragraph 3.2. to law enforcement agencies and other civil authorities are reserved to the Secretary of Defense:
(a) Provision of personnel to support response efforts for civil disturbances, which may also require Presidential authorization.
(b) DoD response to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield explosive incidents.
(c) Assistance in responding with assets with potential for lethality, or any situation in which it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury. It also includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated. Such use of force must be in accordance with DoDD 5210.56, potentially as further restricted based on the specifics of the requested support.
(d) Provision or use of DoD unmanned systems in the United States except as delegated by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to the October 31, 2023 Secretary of Defense Memorandum.
b. USD(I&S) Approval. For matters not reserved to the Secretary of Defense in Paragraph 3.3.a.(2)
(Excerpt) Read more at esd.whs.mil ...
We may well get the chance to find out. For my part, I am not nearly as optimistic about the rank and file as you are.
The Patriot Act needs repealing.
Bush was a bad joke as president.
Remember, if anything happens, we meet at the local libraries on Saturday at 9 am!
“The Patriot Act needs repealing.”
That is just on the formal public books. They will always continue to run the hidden set of books we do not see.
bookmark
thanks
bkmk
Trump is NOT president! Can’t do anything!
Just like HAL, the all seeing and all controlling computer in "2001 A Space Odyssey", the monstrosity of the Federal Government will not allow itself to be injured or even threatened. Many or most politicians are only the devil's handmaids and not the real problem, maybe confused about what they are preserving but not at all confused about their power and money the devil gives them in return. The real problem is the massive beast that the Federal Government has become. In my opinion, Executive Orders have become another means to authorized dictatorship and the Federal Monstrosity has taken full advantage of them and anything else it can find for legitimacy to preserve itself. Our beef is not really with politicians, it is with this Government. It has become too broad and too powerful taking on omnipresent and ominous lifelike form becoming "They" and preserved and protected by legions of henchmen that remind me of so many of the little flying monkeys who serve the Wicked Witch of the West in "Wizard of Oz". It is not really the demoncraps that oppose Trump, it is this Government.
In just a few words, DoD Directive 5240.01 has now been modified to include use of deadly force against citizens. Only under the "strictest" of oversight and control mind you.
This revision was signed September 27, 2024 by Kathleen Hicks, Deputy Secretary of DoD. Just doing her job of course by making things more clear and protecting all of us the best way she knows how.
It authorizes mobilization of the military and their use of deadly force in the event of "national emergency" by-passing Congress and the Posse Comatatus Act.
It claims to be authorized by E.O. 12333 signed by none other than Ronald Reagan in December 1981 and by E.O. 13388 by George Bush in October of 2005. All neat, tidy and legal and by Republican Presidents. Both of these orders seem to have been only about national intelligence sharing. Odd how that becomes authorization for this new interpretation isn't it? I'm sure some legal minds have it all justified though.
Equally all neat, tidy and legal this is public information posted in the Federal Register.
Not much to be done about it, just thought you'd like to know when Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 has now been rendered pretty much insignificant if in fact you thought it mattered much at all anyway. We probably shouldn't be concerned at all though, this is by the government and is for our protection of course.
The timing of this does seem a little strange to me though. Probably just coincidence. There are a few people who appear to be pretty concerned about this including one Congresscritter from Maryland. Just Newsmax appear to be carrying his concerns and so it is probably just sensationalism and will soon pass. https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/andy-harris-dod-national-security/2024/10/16/id/1184340/
What is Projection anyway? The democraps seem to do a lot of it while telling us what they plan to do themselves.
I've attached links to 5240.01 and a commentary by a fellow that is, for lack of other credentials, an independent thinker. How this came to this guy's attention so quickly is something else to wonder about. The action by DoD has also attracted the attention of the Federation of American Scientists if that source has more credibility to you.
I also reference other internet links:
DoD 5240.01 https://www.esd.whs.mil/portals/54/documents/dd/issuances/dodd/524001p.pdf
Commentary https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384734176_The_Silent_Shift_How_the_Pentagon's_New_Rules_Redefine_Intelligence_Lethal_Force_and_Domestic_Law_Enforcement
E.O. 12333 by Reagan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_12333
E.O. 13388 by Bush https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_12333
Oh, and Kathleen Hicks. Looks innocent doesn't she? Just another lifelong, self-sacrificing, public servant. One of those who alternates between demoncrap administrations, academia and some think tank as she tries to get by in this cold cruel world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathleen_Hicks
How does this square with the posse comitatus act?
https://irp.fas.org/doddir/dod/d5210_56.pdf
It must all be done properly!
Purpose: This issuance:
• Establishes policy and standards and assigns responsibilities for arming, carrying of firearms, and the use of force by DoD personnel performing security and protection, law and order, investigative, or counterintelligence duties; and for personal protection when related to the performance of official duties.
• Establishes policy and standards and assigns responsibilities for contractor personnel required to carry a firearm in accordance with applicable DoD contracts.
• Implements Section 1585 of Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.), which authorizes civilian officers and employees of the DoD to carry firearms or other appropriate weapons while assigned investigative duties or such other duties as prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.
• Provides requirements, authorizations, and restrictions on carrying firearms and the use of force to protect DoD installations, property, and personnel, and to enforce law and order in accordance with DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5200.08 and DoD 5200.08-R.
• Implements Section 2672 of Title 10, U.S.C., Section 926A of Title 18, U.S.C., and Section 526 of Public Law 114-92 (“the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016”), and authorizes DoD Components to arm DoD personnel qualified under Sections 926B and 926C of Title 18, U.S.C., when related to the performance of official duties.
Lots of links and predecessor actions in all this woven activity and authorization aren't there? Oh what a wicked tale we weave when first we practice to deceive?
I wonder if this means the steal is in the bag?
I also wonder if they are setting Trump up for a currency crisis since they are running the dumbest possible democrat woman that no one in their right mind would put in the WH other than a steal.
I wonder a lot lately.
Kill it with fire
Glad you finally caught up to 3.2. It all sounds so innocuous until you get to 3.2, then the fun and games start.
Just shows that biden knew, years ago, what he was saying when he threatened Christian & MAGA patriots with the F-15 or F-16 if they misbehaved...
(Forget which one he constantly referred to?)
Trump won’t get to the WH and they expect however that fails to happen...WE will be the ones pulling the trigger in the eyes of the media.
I think the last legit election was 2020. This election is to institute the ....final solution.
Yeah, I’m terrified and glad I am old.
No, the threat is in 3.3. 3.2 makes it look innocent, all about just sharing information. The “Let’s all work togather to protect the sheeple.”
The trouble will come from those who want to hold on to power at all cost, we know who they are
Sorry, Posse Comitatus cannot restrain what they are going to do and are doing. They are using OTHER THAN Military. Contractors that will be trained by military.
Refused to listen, and called him a traitor then, and to this day.
Pick a target, Rabid Trump supporters, isolate them using the MSM, and take them out. Who could possibly be against that? Trump supporters perhaps, roll them M Fers up too... As 50% of the public cheers them on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.