I assume it will be eventually possible to produce child porn with AI without the need for sourcing real pictures.
Pennsylvania teen recently arrested for taking classmates yearbook photos and using AI to turn them into nudies.
We are in bizarro world.
There is a lot of what I’d call garbage available out there that I have no desire to watch and I am sure that this garbage would be at or very near top of that list, but a victimless crime? Child porn is illegal because no one wants to see children abused or violated, much less for someone’s profit. But if there’s no child actually abused is it still child pornography? It’s sick, no doubt. But criminal? Maybe I could be convinced but I’m not sure I’m convinced yet. How is this distinguished from certain forms of art, or for that matter, immature sketches or scribbles in a notebook, the kind we all know immature teen and adults have been known to do?
We have too many laws on the books and so many of them are no longer based on there being actual victims, but rather they just criminalize behavior or even attitudes (hate crime, tell me how a judge or jury knows a persons heart). The crime is the act, not the thought about the act.
The prosecutors are swimming against the tide. Judges want a corpus delecti.
Leftist America uses its media glorify Satan.
I never even heard of "child porn" until I was 40 or 50 years old. It is so beyond the pale, completely beyond anything of which I thought a human was capable.
Need we even ask why America has fallen out of God's favor?
***...after allegedly using artificial intelligence (AI) to generate child pornography from photos of children found online.***
Was not there an attempt in the past to get child porn legalized by the SCOTUS If it was a cartoon under “Freedom of the Press” 1st Amendment? Would AI be the same?
Ever notice on Facebook the “Clips and short reels” seems to have a large number of underage girls strutting their stuff?
It appears the perverts are pushing kids younger and younger on the public.