Posted on 09/25/2024 12:10:04 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Paul Pelosi, the husband of Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), sold between $500,000 and $1 million worth of Visa stock, according to public records, just weeks before the Justice Department launched a lawsuit against the credit card company on Tuesday.
The finding raises concerns that many members of Congress trade stocks based on information unavailable to the public.
Seventy-six percent of voters believe congressional members and their spouses have an “unfair advantage” in trading stocks.
Paul Pelosi traded the stock before the DOJ launched a probe into Visa for allegedly monopolizing the debit card market, Bloomberg reported. The New York Post reported the trade: Meanwhile, Christopher Josephs, the tech entrepreneur who runs the “Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker” on X, posted a screenshot of a congressional filing on July 3 which showed that the former House speaker’s husband, Paul Pelosi, had sold 2,000 shares of Visa worth between $500,000 and $1 million.
The disclosure form shows that Pelosi’s transaction is marked “SP,” or spouse — a reference to husband Paul, the San Francisco-based venture capitalist and real estate investor.
At the time Paul Pelosi sold Visa stock, there was no public indication that an antitrust lawsuit against the company was imminent.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
smells like insider trading to me
They don’t even care how it looks anymore!!! These people are DISGUSTING!
America is entering “peak looting stage” on the part of bloated government and its cronies.
No wonder AOC is worth above $40 million. It is way past time to get the leeches and the grifters OUT of DC.
I’m getting so damn sick of these criminals.
Just call him “Paul Buffett.” What a genius financier and trader!
Nancy Pelosi truly believes that she is better than everyone else in the world. She prances around like she is the Queen of all she surveys.
I remember that woman (Leona Hensley?) who was on trial for tax evasion and declared “taxes are for the little people.”
Pelosi has taken that attitude and put it on steroids. She has that persona and it is disgusting.
Martha Stewart, call on line one!..................
paul is a wicked smart stock trader
something he has in common with many
congressional spouses
weird huh?
Will The Botox Queen be sent to Club Fed for a few months?
Membership has its privileges.
Just ask any Senator or Member of Congress.
It’s a great club.
You’re not welcome.
Yes, membership has it privileges. But it’s like the Mob. The last thing the Mob ever wanted were Don’s (like Gotta) who were flamboyant celebs. The Mob wanted to exist in secrecy.
Pelosi is out there flaunting the Club privileges.
you silly conspiracy theorists, paul pelosi is not in congress.
VISA stock was $263 on July 1st, it is $269 today.
Nancy had NOTHING to do with! (/fer sure/ S)
The insider crap aside, how is Visa held responsible for monopolizing the debit card industry. I know nothing about this topic, but aren’t there other cards like MC, AMEX...? Or is this done just to make people like this gazillionaires?
Is Nancy Pelosi's political career influenced by her family's dark past? In this eye-opening video, I dive into the shocking ties between Pelosi's father and the mob, uncovering the roots of her ruthless tactics. I explore how Pelosi's recent betrayal of Joe Biden mirrors classic mob behavior and draws a striking parallel to Marcus Brutus's infamous betrayal of Caesar. Are these just coincidences, or is there a deeper connection? What could possibly lead her to go behind the back of someone she claimed was a longtime friend? Watch now to find out the truth behind Pelosi's actions and the hidden influence of organized crime in politics.Lying Nancy Pelosi is a modern day MOBSTER | 30:20
Michael Franzese | 1.35M subscribers | 429,724 views | August 13, 2024
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
