Posted on 09/10/2024 12:22:16 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA) said Monday on MSNBC’s “Inside” that Vice President Kamala Harris’ knowledge of the facts could be a problem during her debate with former President Donald Trump.
Host Jen Psaki said, “I don’t know if you heard there’s a debate tomorrow. You and the vice president were prosecutors around the same time in California. What do you think that background means for how she will approach a debate with Donald Trump tomorrow night?”
Schiff said, “I think she will be quick on her feet. She will know the facts and be able to marshal the facts in support of her argument. The challenge for the vice president is twofold. One, sometimes knowing the facts too well gets in the way of giving the broader vision, letting people get to know you and seeing the more human side of you. You are at risk of coming across with a laundry list of facts and that’s not what people are looking for.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
In other words she just memorized what the focus groups said, just like Cankles.
Shifty strikes again. LOL!
sometimes knowing the facts too well gets in the way of giving the broader vision
She can’t count to 3 without getting two of the numbers wrong
Bugsy and the facts are not close friends.
I hope she has her answers memorized so well, but that her understanding is so limited, that she answers question A with response B. If we did not have such a complicit media, then a presidential debate would be all about policy. Instead this is theatre. .
Whenever he opens his mouth he reveals what a complete fool he is.
“Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA) said Monday on MSNBC’s “Inside” that Vice President Kamala Harris’ knowledge of the facts could be a problem during her debate with former President Donald Trump.”
Other experts in the know also feared that Kamala could come across as too precise and too perfect and make herself less relatable to the average ignorant independent.
Still others mused that Kamala might be seen as being abusive to the elderly Trump and might win more points by showing some compassion for his stupidity and faults.
(sarcasm)
If you gave her the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch, she’d mess up even worse than King Arthur ...
“I’m too pretty,” basically.
Yes she’s just too damn smart , she’s too knowledgeable , she knows too many facts. She’s just too far above us mere mortals, so there’s the risk we just won’t comprehend her brilliance.
Kamala is just too smart, too well prepared and just too gosh darn for the American people to appreciate.
Where do find such talented and selfless people to answer the call to lead
So, he knows what channel her earwig’s on…
Thank you, Schniff, for setting the debate expectations bar for Harris where it should be. If she is anything less than brilliant and pefectly informed, she loses.
Of course, “the facts” Harris “knows” are upside down from the Truth. She has already claimed that Trump will lie about everything. Watch for her to systematically deny reality: We secured the border. We created jobs. We whipped inflation.
This probably explains the word salads too — she is so smart, has such an elevated understanding of everything in the universe, that when she talks to normal people, she has to struggle to dumb it down so that we can at least partly understand her brilliant insights.
She’s a post-facts intellectual!
Wordsmiths have destroyed our society in their doublespeak. People gobble it up like the words have meaning as they are gaslit. It's absurd.
Uh, is his niece giving him comedic pointers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.