Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gaetz (FL-1) Demands to Know Who Reauthorized Jack Smith's 'Witch Hunt' Against Trump
The Floridian ^ | September 9th 2024 | Grayson Bakich

Posted on 09/10/2024 12:01:55 PM PDT by Jacquerie

Special Counsel Jack Smith has filed superseding indictments against former President Donald Trump, despite a federal judge previously ruling Smith was unlawfully appointed to pursue. Representative Matt Gaetz (R-FL) has sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland demanding to know who authorized this new indictment.

In July, Judge Aileen Cannon ruled that Smith was unlawfully appointed to his prosecution of Trump for attempting to overturn the 2020 Election. As Fox News described, the prosecutor filed a new, amended indictment into a separate probe, which Rep. Gaetz suggests has even less legal validity in his letter.

"It is unclear what authority Special Counsel Smith has to file either of these briefs or to provide services to the Department of Justice," the Florida Congressman wrote.

As a result, Rep. Gaetz demanded that AG Garland turn over any written authorization or legal opinions that were cited in allowing Smith to continue pursuing Trump, and if Smith's office consulted with Garland, the Deputy Attorney General, or the Public Integrity Section when considering the filing of the new indictment.

"Jack Smith is . . . somewhat of a lunatic."

(Excerpt) Read more at floridianpress.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: aileencannon; creepstate; deepstate; doj; doublejeopardy; fbi; fib; florida; gaetz; graysonbakich; idiotstale; jacksmith; lawfare; mattgaetz; merrickgarland; persecution; policestate; signifyingnothing; singlepartystate; witchhunt

1 posted on 09/10/2024 12:01:55 PM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

I doubt if Garland will tell the truth. After all, why start now?


2 posted on 09/10/2024 12:03:27 PM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Who is going to make him?


3 posted on 09/10/2024 12:08:09 PM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Who? Just about every unelected bureaucrat in the federal government, that’s who....


4 posted on 09/10/2024 12:11:43 PM PDT by blackdog ((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

So it was Kamala or maybe Biden or maybe Obama or maybe Soros or even maybe Trump,who according to the Lame Street Media or internet billionaires or Deep State just wanted publicity.


5 posted on 09/10/2024 12:12:16 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Fake law from a fake government installed by fake “elections”.


6 posted on 09/10/2024 12:19:59 PM PDT by kiryandil (Kraft durch Freude! - The Kamunist and The Walzrus )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

obama is still the boss...


7 posted on 09/10/2024 12:26:36 PM PDT by SuperLuminal ( Where is Samuel Adams when we so desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

In Texas we would file a Rule 12 motion demanding the attorney show authority to act on behalf of the client. That puts the burden on the attorney to show he/she IS authorized.


8 posted on 09/10/2024 12:36:00 PM PDT by jagusafr ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Meanwhile, (Per Julie Kelly) yesterday the DC appellate court vacated the 1512(c)(2) convictions of eleven J6 defendants including Guy Reffitt, the first J6er convicted at trial.

What a total humiliation of the DOJ and 17 DC judges (including Pan) who allowed this wrongful prosecution to happen in the 1st place.


9 posted on 09/10/2024 12:57:30 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

At face value it would appear the judges abused their offices and deserve no immunity.

Let Scotus apply their three-tier test to the judiciary.


10 posted on 09/10/2024 1:03:18 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

No!

Why do people keep saying this? Obama is a complete fraud. He may not be suffering from dementia like the Biden-puppet, but the Obama-puppet is still just a puppet.

Listen to him talk for five minutes and you’ll see he’s not the mastermind of anything.


11 posted on 09/10/2024 1:19:08 PM PDT by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CFW

How so? You don’t think locking ordinary citizens up on a literal gulag for almost four years had the desired chilling effect on exerci 1A rights?


12 posted on 09/10/2024 1:41:55 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Judge has already ruled Smith is unconstitutional. Trump can ignore his filings.


13 posted on 09/10/2024 2:24:54 PM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Judge has already ruled Smith is unconstitutional. Trump can ignore his filings.


14 posted on 09/10/2024 2:25:04 PM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Matt Gaetz needs to read Judge Cannon's ruling.

Smith's superseding indictments were for the D.C. case.

the ruling was only for this particular case and can extend to any cases in Judge Cannon’s district - southern district of florida.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.672.0.pdf

last page
3. This Order is confined to this proceeding. The Court decides no other legal rights or claims.
15 posted on 09/10/2024 2:44:07 PM PDT by stylin19a (America-has citizens who will cross an ocean to fight for freedom but won't cross the street to vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Cannon’s ruling is based on Clarence Thomas’s separate, concurring opinion in which he questioned the constitutionality of Smith’s appointment.


16 posted on 09/10/2024 2:53:41 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

I know. I get it. What she based it on and how she actually ruled are 2 different things.


17 posted on 09/10/2024 3:04:04 PM PDT by stylin19a (America-has citizens who will cross an ocean to fight for freedom but won't cross the street to vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Wouldn’t he have had to go back to a grand jury to get a new indictment?


18 posted on 09/10/2024 3:06:47 PM PDT by TiGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

19 posted on 09/10/2024 5:52:43 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson