Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Georgia’s Brad Raffensperger Illegally Change Absentee Ballot Rules In 2020?
The Federalist ^ | 08/21/2024 | Mark Davis

Posted on 08/21/2024 9:37:33 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Georgia voters deserve to know whether Brad Raffensperger, the state election board, and county boards of election violated the law in the 2020 election.

The people who called the 2020 election the “most secure” in history have spent the past several years slandering as “election deniers” anyone who questions that election’s administration. But others remain frustrated by the many last-minute changes to election laws and processes that occurred shortly before that presidential contest — changes that in some cases may have been illegal.

In Georgia, the state election board unanimously adopted a rule change in May 2020, citing Covid-19. It allowed counties to open and scan absentee ballots up to three weeks before the November 2020 general election and several other elections in the 2020 election cycle.

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp had declared a public health state of emergency on March 13, 2020, and called for a special session of the general assembly to ratify this action through a joint resolution, which the legislature approved. Then. in a move that remains controversial, Secretary of State Raffensperger announced on March 24, 2020, that he would be “mailing absentee ballot request forms to every Georgia voter,” a number he placed at 6.9 million.

Emergency Rule Approved

During a May 18, 2020, state election board meeting, Raffensperger’s General Counsel Ryan Germany argued in favor of the proposed rule change. He told the board that 1.4 million absentee ballot applications had been accepted, most had already been delivered, and 360,000 had already been returned to election officials.

I think the last presidential preference primary, general primary, there was 36,000 total absentee vote-by-mail ballots cast in the entire election. So we’re already at well above that in orders of magnitude,” according to Germany.

Summarizing his argument for the emergency rule, Germany said, “With this many absentee ballots coming in, if there is going to be a way to get results any time quickly after the election, we think we need to allow counties to start processing these absentee ballots early.”

After a brief discussion by the board, the rule passed unanimously, and the meeting adjourned.

Violating the Law?

But the passage of that rule by the board, which was chaired by Raffensperger at the time, violated a Georgia statute requiring absentee ballots to be kept “safely, unopened, and stored,” a legal filing by Georgia voter Tim Adderholdt argues. Adderholdt cites OCGA 21-2-386, claiming that for 97 years, from 1924 until the law was amended in March 2021 by the passage of SB202, the law required that:

The board of registrars or absentee ballot clerk shall keep safely, unopened, and stored in a manner that will prevent tampering and unauthorized access all official absentee ballots received from absentee electors prior to the closing of the polls.

He also cites a June 26, 1980, opinion of the Georgia attorney general on the law, which confirmed that, stating:

This is in response to your recent request for my opinion on whether a board of registrars may open envelopes containing absentee ballots prior to the closing of the polls, in the interest of expediting the counting of absentee ballots.

In my opinion, the mandatory language of [the relevant statute] forecloses all discussion of the matter. The board of registrars must keep the envelopes safe and unopened until after the closing of the polls.

When asked for comment, Mike Hassinger, public information officer for the secretary of state responded: “We can’t comment on any pending litigation or legal matters.”

Adderholdt told me that if the board had relied on some unspecified emergency power when it adopted the rule, he had not yet heard that argument in any of the legal proceedings. Those began in December 2020, when Adderholdt filed a complaint in the superior court in Cherokee County, where he lives, to prevent the county from opening and scanning ballots ahead of the January 2021 U.S. Senate runoff.

Following the election, that court found that the county had “opened the ballots pursuant to State Election Board Emergency Rule 183-1-14-.09-.15,” which “expired January 5, 2021,” but dismissed the suit, stating the passage of SB 202 had rendered the case moot.

Armed with that finding of fact, Adderholdt, who for more than three years had represented himself, lodged his criminal complaint in magistrate court. When that court ruled that it did not have the “authority to decide” the legality of the rule, Adderholdt retained criminal attorney and candidate for the Georgia House of Representatives Catherine Bernard to appeal the decision to the Cherokee County Superior Court.

Voters Deserve to Know if the Law was Violated

Another Georgia attorney, Harry Macdougald, says the emergency powers given to Kemp in the name of Covid did not extend to the secretary of state or the state election board, and that:

As a basic matter of administrative law, regulations may not contradict the statutes under which they are promulgated. The rule-making authority granted by O.C.G.A. § 21-2-31(2) requires that the rules be consistent with law. The regulation for early opening and scanning of absentee ballots was plainly contrary to the statute governing the handling of absentee ballots and therefore clearly unlawful.

Adderholdt has accused Raffensperger of three criminal offenses: “Violation of oath by a public officer,” “false statements and writings,” and “criminal solicitation.” If probable cause of such violations were to be found, the court could theoretically grant an arrest warrant against the secretary of state.

Whatever the outcome of Adderholdt’s case, Georgia voters deserve to know whether Raffensperger, the state election board, and county boards of election violated the law in the 2020 election.


Mark Davis is president of Data Productions, Inc., and has been working with voter data since 1986. He has been qualified and admitted to testify as an expert witness on voter data analytics and residency issues in court cases involving disputed elections five times over the last 20 years.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 2020; ballots; georgia; raffensperger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 08/21/2024 9:37:33 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I hope they throw the creep in jail.


2 posted on 08/21/2024 9:43:23 AM PDT by McGavin999 ( A sense of humor is a sign of intelligence, leftists have no sense of humor, therefo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

WHY is this coming out NOW? This question should have already been answered, and the remedy implemented.


3 posted on 08/21/2024 9:46:36 AM PDT by Captainpaintball (America needs a Conservative DICTATOR if it hopes to survive. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Massachusetts Democrat Secretary of State William (”Bill”) Galvin did in 2020, reluctantly after a great deal of arm twisting by other Democrat elected officials. Republican Governor Baker did nothing to protest or pushback. Massachusetts was probably a hopeless case in 2020, but the Massachusetts GOP was worse than supine.


4 posted on 08/21/2024 9:47:50 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (לעזאזל עם חמאס)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yes he did, which was the basis for Lin Wood’s lawsuits here in GA, which were argued in lesser courts up to SCOTUS.

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/220116-Petition-for-eservice.pdf


5 posted on 08/21/2024 9:49:08 AM PDT by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball

Not new, was argued in the courts in 2021, and dismissed like the majority of the cases regarding election without ever being heard on merit.

The full list is here

https://election-integrity.info/2020_Election_Cases.htm


6 posted on 08/21/2024 9:55:47 AM PDT by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; poconopundit; Jane Long; Diana in Wisconsin; Grampa Dave; Godzilla; Vaduz; null and void; ...

National Conference of State Legislatures
444 N. Capitol St., N.W., Suite 515
Washington, D.C. 20001
202-624-5400


Election Administration at the State Level

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) mandates that each state designate a chief election official to oversee elections in the state.

In 33 states, voters elect the chief election official. In most of those states, the elected chief election official is the secretary of state, but in Alaska and Utah the role is held by the lieutenant governor.

In six states—Delaware, Florida, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas and Virginia—the governor appoints the chief election official. In all but Delaware and Virginia, the chief election official is called the secretary of state. In Delaware and Virginia, the chief election officials are known as commissioners of elections.

In four states—Maine, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and Tennessee—the chief election official is selected by the legislature. Both chambers have a role, except in Oklahoma where responsibility lies solely with the state senate.

In seven states—Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina and Wisconsin—and Washington, D.C., the chief election official is appointed by the state board or commission of elections.

Seventeen states and Washington, D.C., have a board or commission that oversees elections in the state or jurisdiction.

In 10 states—Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Virginia and Wisconsin—and Washington, D.C., a board or commission oversees elections, and the state chief election official is a member of the board or commission. Appointments to election boards are usually made by the governor and confirmed by the senate, and boards are most often structured to be bipartisan, with a certain number of members from each of the major political parties.

In seven states—Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Rhode Island, Tennessee and West Virginia—election responsibilities are shared between a secretary of state and a board or commission.

Duties of the chief election official or election board vary. Secretaries of state have other duties in addition to the management of elections. For example, they may administer business filings and licensing in the state, and act as the keeper of the state seal. Enforcing campaign finance regulations may be the responsibility of a secretary of state or state elections board—or even a separate ethics commission.

When both an elected individual and a board or commission are charged with elections, the division of duties varies. Rhode Island is one example of shared responsibilities. There, the secretary of state’s office manages ballot design, layout and coding; sending out mail ballots; certifying candidates; and overseeing procurement for voting equipment. The state board of elections packages equipment, supplies and precinct tabulators and delivers them to each city or town before an election; troubleshoots technical issues on Election Day; and receives and tabulates statewide results.

State-level responsibilities include ensuring that election laws are followed by local officials statewide; administration of a statewide voter registration database required by HAVA; assisting local election officials by providing training courses or materials on running elections in the state; and providing a process for testing and certifying voting equipment for use in the state. Some state offices also provide certification programs for local election officials on election procedures and may also help pay for certain types of elections, or a portion of expenses.

The table below contains information about the chief election official in each state.

snip


7 posted on 08/21/2024 9:57:35 AM PDT by Liz ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Adderholdt has accused Raffensperger of three criminal offenses: “Violation of oath by a public officer,” “false statements and writings,” and “criminal solicitation.” If probable cause of such violations were to be found, the court could theoretically grant an arrest warrant against the secretary of state.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

raff’s a dirty pol


8 posted on 08/21/2024 10:09:00 AM PDT by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinden

Also, who were the two ladies that pulled the suitcase out from under the clothed table, ran ballots through over and over for bite me? That was in Atlanta (remember the fake water pipe leak)

Didn’t they get awarded some astronomical amount of money because they were deemed slandered or some such nonsense?


9 posted on 08/21/2024 10:35:49 AM PDT by WaterWeWaitinFor (Pray for the safety of President Trump, his family, and We The People. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why yes he did..😏


10 posted on 08/21/2024 10:43:28 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The question is rhetorical...


11 posted on 08/21/2024 11:06:55 AM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In short, yes. The legislature of each state makes election law as is plainly stated in the US Constitution.

The Sec of State is part of the executive branch, not the legislative branch. The executive does not get to pass laws. He did this without the consent of the legislature and it was thus, both illegal and unconstitutional.


12 posted on 08/21/2024 11:51:11 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

BTTT


13 posted on 08/21/2024 12:29:15 PM PDT by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Whatever the outcome of Adderholdt’s case, Georgia voters deserve to know whether Raffensperger, the state election board, and county boards of election violated the law in the 2020 election.

Of course they violated the law.

14 posted on 08/21/2024 12:31:03 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In Texas, we process the signatures on absentee ballots starting in early October. If a ballot is accepted, the inner envelope is opened, and the ballot is placed in a ballot box. The ballot boxes remain closed til the weekend before election day when they are counted along with all the early votes and results held til closing time on election day. We get the entire count for all votes finished in most counties by the time the 10pm news airs.


15 posted on 08/21/2024 12:48:50 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Election Administration at the State Level

Starting to look like a oxymoron when democrats are in charge of things.

Wonder if midnight tar and feathering is returning?.

And soon


16 posted on 08/21/2024 12:48:57 PM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WaterWeWaitinFor

Ruby Freeman and daughter


17 posted on 08/21/2024 1:47:33 PM PDT by combat_boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Perhaps he noticed the car bombing.


18 posted on 08/21/2024 2:01:03 PM PDT by Rlsau1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Very informative!


19 posted on 08/21/2024 2:48:02 PM PDT by Bob Ireland (The Democrap Party is the enemy of freedom.They use all the seductions and deceits of the Bolshevics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WaterWeWaitinFor

Also, who were the two ladies

xxxxxxxxxxxx

yeah. that was ruby & her daughter

defamation $$$ skam for being defamed for the crimes they were caught on tape


20 posted on 08/21/2024 3:17:28 PM PDT by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson