Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joe Biden tries to sacrifice the Supreme Court not for ‘democracy’ but for the far left
new york post ^ | JONATHAN TURLEY

Posted on 08/04/2024 6:24:35 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

President (and Supreme Court Chief Justice) William Howard Taft once said, “Presidents come and go, but the Supreme Court goes on forever.”

But not if Joe Biden has his way. Indeed, both the president and court as we know it could be gone.

In a failed attempt to save his nomination, Biden offered to “reform” the court by imposing an 18-year term limit that would jettison the three most senior conservative justices.

With only six months left in his presidency, Biden’s efforts are likely to fail, but, unfortunately, could set the stage for activists under a Harris administration in seeking to change the court forever.

For more than 50 years, Biden staunchly refused to play politics with the Supreme Court and support calls for “reforms” from the left of his party.

For a politician who has long been criticized for changing positions with the polls on issues from abortion to criminal justice to gun rights, the court was one of the few areas of true principle for Biden.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: biden; interference; scotus; scotusattack; tampering; turley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
In addition to metal decline, since 2020 Joe has lost any principles he ever pretended to have. Kamala is even worse.
1 posted on 08/04/2024 6:24:35 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

So... term limits for Senators and Congressmen?


2 posted on 08/04/2024 6:25:38 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

I would state that Joe NEVER had any principles that we would recognize.


3 posted on 08/04/2024 6:36:30 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

The founders set the SC up so it would be protected from tyrants like Herr Biden. Let’s hope and pray it’s protected enough.


4 posted on 08/04/2024 6:38:00 PM PDT by Bullish (...And just like that, I was dropped from the ping-list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

FTA——AP’s NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found 67% of Americans, including 82% of Democrats and 57% of Republicans, support a proposal to set finite terms for justices.

But there were few law professors and even fewer Democratic members clamoring for term limits until conservatives secured a stable majority on the court. Then, suddenly, the court had to be “reformed” without delay.

It is no accident that the first three justices who would be term-limited off the court are conservatives: Clarence Thomas (after 33 years on the court), Chief Justice John Roberts (after 19 years) and Justice Samuel Alito (after 18 years).

SEE ALSO NYP link
Biden’s illegitimate ‘reforms’ are a nakedly political
bid to tilt the Supreme Court on his way out....(to make Jill stop nagging?).


5 posted on 08/04/2024 6:43:04 PM PDT by Liz (This then is how we should pray : Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name . )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Joe has been for Joe—and Hunter’s blow.


6 posted on 08/04/2024 6:59:48 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Liz

There are rumors that Alito is considering retirement. A big reason why Kamala needs to lose. Dems are screeching even louder about Thomas.


7 posted on 08/04/2024 7:12:51 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

“For more than 50 years, Biden staunchly refused to play politics with the Supreme Court…”

Utter BS - he sat on the Judiciary Committee & was at the center of taking out Robert Bork plus the “high tech lynching” of Clarence Thomas.


8 posted on 08/04/2024 7:14:06 PM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

SCOTUS nominations had been political before Bork. Proposing term limits is a huge escalation. I never liked Biden, but in the Judiciary Committee he cast doubts on Anita Hill’s accusations against Thomas (maybe he felt guilty about Bork). I think Kamala is even worse than Biden, although they agree most of the time.


9 posted on 08/04/2024 7:26:44 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Xiden never had any principles, honor, decency or integrity to begin with at all.


10 posted on 08/04/2024 7:26:56 PM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: No name given

Exactly. Now, with his mental state, it is basically what ever policy his handlers want him to support.


11 posted on 08/04/2024 7:41:04 PM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

12 posted on 08/04/2024 8:30:33 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Start with 2 terms for Senators, and 3 for the House. Do that first, then move on.


13 posted on 08/04/2024 8:41:49 PM PDT by vpintheak (Sometimes you’re the windshield, sometimes you’re the bug. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Biden is an empty locker in which the left stores is favorite hobby horses in the hope that someday the American people would be stupid enough to dig them out and embrace them. That is all there is to this.


14 posted on 08/04/2024 9:07:45 PM PDT by Belteshazzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No name given
Xiden never had any principles, honor, decency or integrity to begin with at all.

I absolutely second that emotion. It's spot on. Biden is a steaming pile of pig's dung.

15 posted on 08/04/2024 9:38:39 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

“For more than 50 years, Biden staunchly refused to play politics with the Supreme Court “

Well, that’s just false. Anyone who remembers the Clarence Thomas hearings that Biden conducted should remember vicious, shameless and dishonest politics by Joe.


16 posted on 08/04/2024 9:52:06 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
You are right, Biden did play politics. I don't like Biden and I don't believe the accusations against Thomas. But Biden also kept some of Hill's witnesses from testifying (possibly because he didn't want to be accused of racism), and that action may have allowed Thomas to be confirmed. If Ted Kennedy had been chairman who knows what would have happened.

I think Turley is right that SCOTUS was more protected in the past, but that was not the result of virtuous Dem senators. Biden voted NO on Thomas's confirmation.

17 posted on 08/05/2024 12:19:26 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Notably, if Biden were to seek this change as a legislative matter without a constitutional amendment, future Congresses could pare terms further from 18 to eight years or even less... If Congress has this authority, it could change the occupants of the court faster than a South Beach timeshare condo.

What does Turley mean by "If Congress has this authority...?" He's the so-called Constitutional Scholar, doesn't he know?

The Constitution says that the Justices "shall hold their Offices during good Behavior." How can that be changed legislatively? Change has to be via amendment.

-PJ

18 posted on 08/05/2024 1:04:09 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

None of which his puppeteers wants will happen.


19 posted on 08/05/2024 4:09:43 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Sloe Joe’s mentality has ALWAYS BEEN: “There they go, and I must follow! For, I am their leader, I think!”


20 posted on 08/05/2024 4:14:01 AM PDT by Taxman ((SAVE AMERICA! VOTE REPUBLICAN IN 2024! SAVE AMERICA!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson