Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zelensky Admits Abrams Tanks Toothless on Battlefield, Seeks Scores of F-16s
Sputnik ^ | 7/10/24 | Sputnik

Posted on 07/10/2024 3:40:39 PM PDT by hardspunned

WASHINGTON (Sputnik) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said during his remarks on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Washington that it is unlikely that the 31 US-supplied Abrams tanks made much of a difference on the battlefield in Ukraine. "I'm not sure that such a number of tanks can change the situation in the battle," Zelensky said on Tuesday. In May, CNN reported, citing Ukrainian crews maintaining the M1 Abrams tanks supplied by the United States, that there were numerous issues with using the armored vehicles on the battlefield. The crews said that the $10 million vehicles did not have sufficient armor against modern weapons such as drones, thus failing to adequately protect personnel against attacks. One member said the tanks had become Russian forces’ "number one target."

(Excerpt) Read more at sputnikglobe.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Ukraine
KEYWORDS: sputnik
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
NATO does not want to put troops on that battlefield.
1 posted on 07/10/2024 3:40:39 PM PDT by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

NATO should put Nukes on that battlefield?


2 posted on 07/10/2024 3:43:31 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

“Zelensky Admits Abrams Tanks Toothless on Battlefield”

Only TOTAL IDIOTS thought that they’d ever work, but they did buy him time towards our November election, after which, of course, we’ll leave his fate to the Azovs.


3 posted on 07/10/2024 3:45:27 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

If anyone thought that 31 under-armored tanks of any kind would be game changers well….
Now give them 500 of the best M1s with 2000 Bradley, 2000 Strykers and they might make a difference, but until airpower arrived, sufficient air defenses and permission to hit Russia on their territory where it hurts, you could give them 6000 m1s and the game would only change a fraction.

We are asking them to fight a war in a way we never would and some are “shocked”

What is shocking(not really) is how the “2nd greatest military “ has not defeated the little russians


4 posted on 07/10/2024 3:48:27 PM PDT by blitz128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

I realize these are older versions of the Abrams, but is this showing a problem with our tanks? Will this lead to the Pentagon pushing for a complete replacement in the US?


5 posted on 07/10/2024 3:49:20 PM PDT by Reno89519 (I'll go out on a limb: Trump & Gabbard 2024 or Trump & Sanders 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

All tanks are worthless on the modern battlefield.

They’re mobile metal coffins.


6 posted on 07/10/2024 3:53:34 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

The problem with the tanks is they are tanks.

In the era of drones and sophisticated manpads, tanks are just targets.


7 posted on 07/10/2024 3:55:14 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

the Ukie war has been terrible advertisement for the US MIC.

Everything touted as a “game changer” [himar, atacm, abrams, patriot] has proven incapable of stopping, or slowing much, the russkie advances.

Those in the market for such things are surely keeping score.


8 posted on 07/10/2024 3:55:22 PM PDT by TonyinLA (I don't have sufficient information to formulate a reasoned opinion said no lefty ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blitz128
We are asking them to fight a war

Right there.....Seen all this before.

9 posted on 07/10/2024 3:56:27 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519
I realize these are older versions of the Abrams, but is this showing a problem with our tanks?

I think these are older tanks and probably don't use the latest shells. Also, I doubt the Ukrainians get the same level of training that our guys get.

10 posted on 07/10/2024 3:56:36 PM PDT by libertylover (Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

The biggest problem with the Abrams tanks is the turbine engine. It was a stupid decision to put it in the tank. I am sure it was due to a sweetheart deal for a turbine manufacturer.


11 posted on 07/10/2024 3:57:04 PM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

I said this over 20 years ago while and during the whole time I was in tbe infantry heh.


12 posted on 07/10/2024 3:57:13 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

“NATO should put Nukes on that battlefield?”

Do you want to wake up as a glowing pile of ash in the morning?


13 posted on 07/10/2024 3:57:30 PM PDT by TonyinLA (I don't have sufficient information to formulate a reasoned opinion said no lefty ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

True. We are not asking them to fight a war, we are allowing them to fight a war which, on their own, they had no chance of fighting. The Ukraine war is an tragedy, a farce, and a crime against humanity.


14 posted on 07/10/2024 4:00:04 PM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Maybe Zalensky needs some of these. I wonder about the availability of Lithium hydride.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Bravo


15 posted on 07/10/2024 4:00:48 PM PDT by kawhill (kawhill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Manpads are anti air.

Man Portable Air Defense System.

You’re not popping tanks with a stinger. Wrong tool for the job.


16 posted on 07/10/2024 4:03:36 PM PDT by This_Dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

“All tanks are worthless on the modern battlefield. They’re mobile metal coffins.”

Particularly when the other side has control of the air.

But they’ll again find a use...just watch!


17 posted on 07/10/2024 4:06:40 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

“I realize these are older versions of the Abrams, but is this showing a problem with our tanks? Will this lead to the Pentagon pushing for a complete replacement in the US?”

The Pentagon may request this, but don’t forget how much this bunch in DC literally HATES THE MILITARY - so they won’t be getting, no way.


18 posted on 07/10/2024 4:08:17 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blitz128
It started becoming painfully obvious very early in the Ukraine conflict that the Ukrainians were not being provided with sufficient weapons and ammo to actually beat the Russians and drive them out of Ukraine.

What they were being given was just enough to keep the Ukrainians in the fight with NATO supplied weapons so they could wage a protected proxy war that tied the Russians down in Ukraine to bleed Russian troops and attrit Russian tanks, aircraft and weapons systems.

US and NATO leaders actually bragged about how we were killing Russians and destroying Russian weapon systems for bargain basement money and all the destruction was being done on Ukrainian territory and all the dying was being done by Ukrainian troops.

We are now entering into the bad side of crazy town with Zelensky.

A month or so ago, we were told that the F-16s were useless and the Ukraine needs more M-1 tanks , Bradley fighting vehicles, air defense systems and artillery shells .

Now we are being told that the M-1 tanks are worthless and the Ukraine desperately needs F-16s

We are hearing serious Fuhrer Bunker style talk coming from Zlensky these days.

19 posted on 07/10/2024 4:09:34 PM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned
F-16 = Sitting Duck (if located in Ukraine)

F-16 = Provocation to go Nuclear (if located in Poland, Romania, etc.)

20 posted on 07/10/2024 4:11:59 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (Kafka was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson