Posted on 07/01/2024 6:33:16 AM PDT by CFW
The Supreme Court will be issuing Opinions at 10:00 a.m. this morning for the October 2023 term. You can read the opinions released thus far at Supreme Court opinions.
The attorneys at scotusblog will be liveblogging the release of opinions from the pressroom.
There are four cases remaining undecided for the October 2023 term.
October sitting: All opinions have been released;
November sitting: All opinions have been released;
December sitting: All opinions have been released;
January sitting: All opinions have been released.
February sitting: There are three cases pending.
Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, (an Administrative Procedure Act issue), and the two First Amendment cases. Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, and NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton.
March sitting: All opinions have been released.
And then there is the case we are all waiting for from the...
April setting: There is one case remaining undecided.
Which is the case of Trump v. U.S., No. 23-939 [Arg: 4.25.2024]
Issue(s): Whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.
Opinion days are fun but nerve-racking. Join the fun, post your comments and insights here at the thread, and, say a prayer for the Justices!
(Excerpt) Read more at scotusblog.com ...
Ted Baxter, is that you?
THIS AND CHRVRON ARE BEGINING TO REIGN IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE.
clawing back our republic one ruling at a time!
The decision to prosecute a sitting or former president is inherently a political decision. The Constitutiion lays out the process to be followed.
Well? We’re waiting.
for the 10 am decisions.
And they began announcing opinions at 10:00. It just takes a while for the decisions to make it from the bench to cyperspace.
My sense is that if they don’t find a strong level of immunity, that presidents will be forced at the end of any term to issue blanket pardons for themselves their families and anyone who worked for them in any capacity
Sweet
I agree
exactly, which is why I predict they will say presidents have “effective immunity” from any crime for which they have the power to pardon themselves.
The decision to prosecute a sitting or former president is inherently a political decision. The Constitutiion lays out the process to be followed.
You are correct. If it is allowed, it opens up a new can of worms that will severely limit any President’s governing and decision-making abilities.
Jackson is reading her dissent from the bench.
“Justice Jackson in her conclusion: “At the end of a momentous Term, this much is clear: The tsunami of lawsuits against agencies that the Court’s holdings in this case and Loper Bright have authorized has the potential to devastate the functioning of the Federal Government.””
Did Amy note for us how many justices of the 9 were present today?
I presume that any justice not reading from an opinion could already be on the beach, trekking to Europe, have mai-tai in hand, or tooling down the highway in his RV.
Amy didn’t mention how many of the Justices were present.
quote “has the potential to devastate the functioning of the Federal Government”
we can only hope!!!!!
She says that like it’s a bad thing. Sounds to me like the sweetest of music.
Good, rein in Government abuses.
That all sounds reasonable.
But…since when is government “reasonable.”
Good thoughts. Makes perfect sense
Justice Kavanaugh suggests in a concurring opinion that the “Government’s position . . . would fundamentally change administrative law, leaving administrative agencies with extraordinary new power to issue rules free from potential suits by unregulated but adversely affected parties—businesses, environmental plaintiffs, workers, the list goes on.”
Sounds to me like NESARA and Common Law. Sounds to me like repudiation of Woodrow Wilson's agenda.
So, it would be “legal” for the Vice President to murder the President in the White House?
The VP becomes president and pardons themselves?
That doesn’t sound right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.