Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasFreeper2009

The decision to prosecute a sitting or former president is inherently a political decision. The Constitutiion lays out the process to be followed.


44 posted on 07/01/2024 7:10:36 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke

I agree


48 posted on 07/01/2024 7:11:40 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: DugwayDuke

The decision to prosecute a sitting or former president is inherently a political decision. The Constitutiion lays out the process to be followed.


You are correct. If it is allowed, it opens up a new can of worms that will severely limit any President’s governing and decision-making abilities.

Jackson is reading her dissent from the bench.

“Justice Jackson in her conclusion: “At the end of a momentous Term, this much is clear: The tsunami of lawsuits against agencies that the Court’s holdings in this case and Loper Bright have authorized has the potential to devastate the functioning of the Federal Government.””


50 posted on 07/01/2024 7:12:54 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson