Posted on 06/26/2024 12:59:01 PM PDT by Red Badger
Part of the deal to free Julain Assange included deleting the leaked DNC files!
The case against Julian Assange rested on his allegedly encouraging Private Bradley Manning to download secret military files. Although unrelated to that charge, the Democrat National Committee files were deleted — all 20,000 of them.
The power of the DNC and Hillary Clinton to erase history.
In August 2018, the Democratic National Committee served Wikileaks via Twitter. The case was filed in a New York City court. The suit claimed publishing its emails in 2016 violated federal copyright laws and the Trade Secrets Act.
The DNC accused the site of working with the Trump campaign and Russia to swing the 2016 election in Donald Trump’s favor.
It was a stunt, and a judge dismissed it.
KimDotCom posited a theory at the time. He said he knows Russia didn’t do it, and the Mueller indictment of 12 Russians [the troll farm lawsuit] is a scam initiated by Hillary Clinton. “Mueller is a political hitman tasked to end Trump,” he wrote on Twitter.
Hillary once said she wanted Julian Assange droned.
There could be more to those emails than we will ever know now.
RUSSIAN HACK OR LEAK? The DNC claimed their servers were hacked, but many believed it was a leak. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher thought it was a leak and visited Julian Assange. He claimed it was “an inside job.”
An article written by Patrick Lawrence for the liberal/far-left magazine The Nation presented powerful evidence that the DNC was not hacked; the emails were leaked.
If true, that put the lie to the entire Russia conspiracy that had crippled the Trump presidency. It greatly harmed our relations with Russia.
The intelligence community, which thinks the DNC was hacked, has never examined the actual computers. Instead, they relied on Crowdstrike’s results. And for all their efforts at looking for Russians under every rock, no one presented proof.
No evidence has been presented to prove it is a hack, yet all now assume it was. He expressed outrage over the media’s role as “indefensibly corrupt.”
As Mr. Lawrence put it: The evolution of public discourse in the year since is worthy of scholarly study: Possibilities became allegations, and these became probabilities. Then, the probabilities turned into certainties, and these evolved into what are now taken to be established truths. By my reckoning, it required a few days to a few weeks to advance from each of these stages to the next. This was accomplished via the indefensibly corrupt manipulations of language repeated incessantly in our leading media.
He continued: Lost in a year that often appeared to veer into our peculiarly American kind of hysteria is the absence of any credible evidence of what happened last year and who was responsible for it. It is tiresome to note, but none has been made available. Instead, we are urged to accept the word of institutions and senior officials with long records of deception. These officials profess “high confidence” in their “assessment” as to what happened in the spring and summer of last year—this standing as their authoritative judgment.
Mr. Lawrence wrote that forensic investigators, intelligence analysts, system designers, program architects, and computer scientists of long experience and strongly credentialed have presented evidence that there was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else.
Conveniently, the deletions are happening now, before a possible Trump presidency and potential investigations.
Like With A Cloth?
If dem emails were leaked I would suspect there are copies out there somewhere.
I am certain that there are still copies buried in the dark web and on memory cards in safe locations.
That is one evil person and she’s not even the boss.
If it weren’t for Assange, we wouldn’t know half of the Clinton Uranium-One corruption including John Podesta’s $30 million take. We would know about Hillary’s “spirit cooking.” We wouldn’t know about the IPCC and East Anglia University climate fraud. We wouldn’t know about Hillary and the DNC’s emails, and the likely murder of Seth Rich.
And this is only the list I can think of in these few seconds....
If you want moral and accountable government, you need truth.
The man should have his statue in the Capitol Rotunda.
-PJ
BTTT
shhhhhh..........................
Murder of Seth RichIt's hilarious their refutation depends on law enforcement, the intelligence community, PolitiFact, Snopes, FactCheck.org, NYT, LA Times, and WaPo.The murder of Seth Rich occurred on July 10, 2016, at 4:20 a.m. in the Bloomingdale neighborhood of Washington, D.C. Rich died about an hour and a half after being shot twice in the back. The perpetrators were never apprehended; police suspected he had been the victim of an attempted robbery.
The 27-year-old Rich was an employee of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and his murder spawned several right-wing conspiracy theories, including the false claim, contradicted by the law enforcement branches that investigated the murder, that Rich had been involved with the leaked DNC emails in 2016. It was also contradicted by the July 2018 indictment of 12 Russian military intelligence agents for hacking the e-mail accounts and networks of Democratic Party officials and by the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion the leaked DNC emails were part of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. Fact-checking websites like PolitiFact, Snopes, and FactCheck.org stated that the theories were false and unfounded. The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post wrote that the promotion of these conspiracy theories was an example of fake news.
Archive offline.
In a digital world ‘deleted’ means nothing.
Assange was smarter that Epstein and more than likely had a “doomsday” file that is still out there if anything happened to him.
What goes on the Internet STAYS ON THE INTERNET..................
Gee were the email deleted for any backups too
So. Intelligence damage, agents-in-danger, release of classified information.......whatever. Despite whether you agree on what the extent of all these possibilities pose or not, it is VERY telling that this government (i.e., DOJ) was/is MORE interested in deleting DNC-confidential information.
I don’t really wanna hear any intel-supporters talking about the ‘damage’ done. The damage (DNC files) was deleted.
“4:20 a.m. in the Bloomingdale neighborhood of Washington, D.C.”
That was a rather odd hour to be up & about.
Just think how many people were saved from Arkanside.
So will Assange ever be able to tell the truth about Seth Rich...or would it be too dangerous for him (Arkancide)?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.