[Kazan]

Rubio would be the establishment's dream VP. That a Murdoch publication supports Burgum should make anyone suspicious of him.

Vance would be a great choice but he's needed more in the Senate. He'd be great candidate in 2028.

[Uncle Miltie]

Burgum is nice. Too nice.

[Robert DeLong]

Yeah, we do not need your support anymore Rupert, but send lots of money.

[3RIVRS]

Sadly it almost has to be a woman or minority. Certainly there are qualified candidates but it’s almost like he’s forced to pick a non white guy.

[Flaming Conservative]

Kevin O’Leary thinks Burgum would be really good for the country businness wise. I respect his opinion.

[ckilmer]

If Murdoch is against JD Vance, then that means that he is the right choice for VEEP.

[Erik Latranyi]

Vance is a big gov’t shill pushing for a federalminimum wage increase

[E. Pluribus Unum]

...went all in against Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH)

I haven't been sure about Vance, but after this glowing recommendation by Rupert I am convinced he should be Trump's VP.

[FLT-bird]

JD Vance is exactly who I hope he picks. The Deep State would be afraid of Vance even more than Trump. Which would act as an effective life insurance policy for Trump to make sure the CIA doesn’t JFK him.

[Political Junkie Too]

Burgum and Rubio are not bad options at all. But the Post’s very curious decision to try to trash Vance would suggest that Vance is probably a lot further along than anyone realizes... The powers-that-be in Murdoch’s world seem increasingly desperate to stop a true populist nationalist in Trump’s mold...

And why might that be?

Paul Ryan?

I liked Matt Boyle when I was a morning commuter, but I don't listen to him now. Still, I respect his opinion about the rest of the things that we're not paying attention to.

I've read stories in the past about how editorial boards are separate from the rank-and-file reporters who write the daily stories. The contrast between the Post's front page and the editorial page suggests that a Bigfoot from the C-suite is stepping on the editorial page.

maybe the New York Post should sit out the veepstakes and let the actual adults in the Republican Party have this debate — not the petulant anti-Trump children — and let Trump make up his own mind on who his running mate is going to be.

Consider this a marker... a *ping* for future reference.

We'll see how strident the Post's editorial board gets as the election season progresses.

-PJ

[boycott]

The Murdochs running the show now are extremist liberals. No way anyone should listen to them.

[Trumpisourlastchance]

Since the Satanists are against Vance, he’s the best one of the supposed crop.

[Bernard]

NO SENATORS! Even the good ones have no track record in actual governing or management; just time in front of a camera.

Given the field, my first choice is Ben Carson, and for one reason only; if anything were to happen to Donald Trump, Ben Carson would be the best choice to finish out the term. And then not run again.

Leave 2028 to the next generation. Did I mention NO SENATORS! ?