Posted on 06/17/2024 3:24:27 PM PDT by blueyon
UPDATE: Federal court grants Biden DOJ request to move $30 million Ashli Babbitt wrongful death lawsuit from Ashli's home in San Diego to Washington DC. The case was just assigned to Judge Jia Cobb, who was appointed to the bench by President Biden in 2021.
People always think,”At least they can’t arrest all of us!”
But that is cold comfort when they throw YOU in a cell !!!
He can fire insubordinate employees. Harry Truman did it to MacArthur. Trump did it to a Secret Service agent who publicly said she would refuse to take a bullet for him, and to Sessions, Flynn, Scaramuchi and others. You don’t get to disobey a direct order from the CIC.
Bookmarked. NYC and DC are not US territory. More evidence every day.
The judges stooges on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia are carefully selected for their goose-stepping march to the verdict the Swamp wants.
I’m not so sure about firing Flynn. Maybe Trump did it because the deep state sh** flinging was so intense he thought he had no choice. Did Flynn disobey a direct order?
We see you.
Just would be that the byrd would have been put on trial immediately upon his murdering of Ashli Babbit not 3 plus years to talk wrongful death.
------------------------
You were so close.
I think the key is that it's a civil action, not a criminal action.
Well that's that. The greasy corrupt courts of DC will dismiss it entirely.
It is impossible for anyone to win in the company town courts. If there was to be any sort of win, it had to occur outside the District of Corruption.
It would be nice to see her work. Have it analyzed.
Given the recent confirmation hearings and the disasters that are some of these potential judges, I’m betting she doesn’t have to be that good.
If the judges agree with the fight you’re picking, a nine year old can win that case.
Gezz.. How sick is that.? Crooked son-of-a-guns.!!
Jurisdiction and Venue for Lawsuits
- - - - -
Babbitt Document 14-1 at page 13:
9. SummaryWeighing these factors in total, Plaintiffs have a strong interest in litigating in their chosen forum. However, because the events giving rise to this action occurred in the proposed transferee forum, Defendant has a less significant burden of demonstrating that a transfer is warranted. Considering the convenience to party and non-party witnesses, local interest in the controversy, and ease of access of sources of proof, the Court concludes Defendant has met its burden of demonstrating that a transfer is justified “for the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).
Defendants facing felony criminal charges with 90% hostile jury pool, like Trump, need no change of venue. But O. J. Simpson, different story.
Has been for some time. Perhaps led by marxists would be the better term. But an Oligarchy none the less.
Defendants facing felony criminal charges with 90% hostile jury pool, like Trump, need no change of venue.
Assuming you refer to the J6 trial in DC, to where do you presume to change the venue to, and remain in DC?
Amendment VI "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law...."
But O. J. Simpson, different story.
The O.J. case was filed in downtown Los Angeles and not moved. O.J. was acquitted. The prosecution was absolutely dreadful, except when recounted by the talking heads on nightly tv. In court, it was one disaster after another.
The O.J. trial was held in a Los Angeles County Court where DA Gil Garcetti chose to file it. Had it been held in Santa Monica (also in LA county), the jury pool selection would still have been county-wide. Also, the jury was empanelled with the prosecution holding 10 unused peremptory challenges.
No. He made an incorrect statement to the VP which embarrassed said VP in front of the MSM, pertaining to Russia. And had lunch with the Russian ambassador. Once. And didn’t disclose it.
I think its clear....do not visit the DC area at all....sure, you’re not a criminal but we all break some law every day of our lives and who would want to be caught in that DC court hell...
I was talking about the Bragg case, not the DC case. The 6th Amendment requires "an impartial jury." Tell me you believe that Trump was likely to find an impartial jury there. If so, you are giving Bragg and Merchan too much credit. If Merchan allowed a venue change, I think it's likely that his superiors would not be pleased. Still, I think that would have been fair, because while the 6th Amendments requirement of an "impartial jury" in this case contradicts the requirement that it be held in the district where the alleged crime occurred, I believe the first requirement should surmount the latter.
I am not sure it makes sense to say that all these alleged crimes would have been committed in Manhattan. Payments today are not necessarily as physical as they were in 1791. And IMO it's nonsense to try to assign a place to the so-called "crime" of intent to influence an election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.