[butterdezillion]

I wasn’t able to read the article without prescribing so I don’t know if the article answers my question but I’ll ask it here in case somebody know the answer.

My understanding is that they put placemarkers that they claimed described the documents but when they wanted to put the documents back in their order they couldn’t tell which document the placemarker was describing because in some cases there weren’t any documents that matched the description.

Am I misunderstanding?

[butterdezillion]

lol. Subscribing, not prescribing. lol

[Qwapisking]

bottom line, as always....do YOU trust your government to be honest and above reproach? big fat NO! here. your experience may vary.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Most of the time you can read a paywalled article by clicking on the "Speedreader" icon in the URL bar (highlighted in yellow below). It works for this article.

[Rockingham]

Accurate, but incomplete. With boxes that contain folders marked declassified and ordinary folders, all that it takes to create a prima facie case of an espionage act violation under the government theory is for the FBI to move a document from a declassified folder to an ordinary folder. And since Trump's attorneys were barred from the scene and place holders not properly identified so as to maintain the original location of a document, such a prima facie case can be created intentionally or even inadvertently with no way to detect if that has taken place.

[Eleutheria5]

If that’s right, it means they removed them permanently. That could be malicious, or just because they’re a bunch of f@#$ ups.