Posted on 06/01/2024 5:32:17 AM PDT by Twotone
On Tuesday, Harvard officials announced that the university would adopt a formal stance of ideological neutrality on political events and other controversial issues. The decision comes after months of tumultuous campus protests over the war between Israel and Hamas.
Earlier this month, a faculty-led working group published a report that strongly recommended adopting a neutral stance on topics that do not directly concern the university itself.
"The university has a responsibility to speak out to protect and promote its core function. Its leaders must communicate the value of the university's central activities. They must defend the university's autonomy and academic freedom when threatened," the report stated. "The university and its leaders should not, however, issue official statements about public matters that do not directly affect the university's core function."
The report hinted at what is likely the prevailing reason behind Harvard's push toward neutrality—the immense pressure faced by school officials to weigh in on Hamas' October 7 attack against Israel, and the ongoing war in Gaza. The report noted how, if officials make statements about one topic unrelated to the university's core function, the school opens itself up to demands it comment on every other controversy.
"If the university and its leaders become accustomed to issuing official statements about matters beyond the core function of the university, they will inevitably come under intense pressure to do so from multiple, competing sides on nearly every imaginable issue of the day," said the report. "This is the reality of contemporary public life in an era of social media and political polarization."
Survey results released last week by The Harvard Crimson indicate widespread faculty support for neutrality. The survey found that more than 70 percent of Arts and Sciences faculty supported a shift to formal neutrality and more than half reported feeling "somewhat negatively" or "negatively" about "the current state of academic freedom at Harvard"
The announcement was met with widespread praise from free expression advocates.
"For better or worse, what Harvard does, others follow," Angel Eduardo, senior writer and editor at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, wrote on Tuesday. "The principles outlined in the Institutional Voice Working Group's report don't just bode well for Harvard's future on free speech and academic freedom—they may also signal a significant sea change in colleges across the country."
On Wednesday, Syracuse University also announced that it would adopt the recommendations of a similar working group and take an official neutral stance.
"We embrace the guiding principle that the remedy for speech that some may find hurtful, offensive, or even hateful is not the disruption, obstruction, or suppression of the free speech of others, but rather more speech," a statement from the university reads. "Except under the most extraordinary circumstances and with the sole purpose of protecting its mission of discovery, improvement, and dissemination of knowledge, the University does not make institutional statements or pronouncements on current controversies."
Have they issued the Yellow Stars to Jewish Students yet?
Given how ridiculous all of their statements have been of late, it’s best that they just STFU and try (probably unsuccessfully) to restore their shattered reputation.
In what was in essence a political statement, Harvard Announces It Will Stop Releasing Political Statements.
Money and applications are said to be down
This won’t last long.
Some political movement will come along that will “compel” the Harvard administration to “speak out” against the “injustice.”
This is the way of our weak-kneed, unprincipled elites.
They must fear that their billions of dollars in their endowment funds are at risk of dwindling through reduced donations.
Actions follow the money.
The real reason: They got blowback from donors telling them to STFU when they started coming out with their woke nonsense.
Just found this -
Harvard Delivers Crushing Blow To 13 Protesters
https://www.stateofunion.org/2024/05/28/harvard-delivers-crushing-blow-to-13-protesters/
“Alex, what is something that will not last a month?”
Good. And surprising!
“From now on we will keep our political bias confidential.”
Losing money are they ?
Too late.
Their donations must be falling off.
This means they won’t condemn the anti-semitic students while quietly suppressing protests by pro-israel supporters.
“Jews go home”
“Harvard, why aren’t you condemining this hate speech?”
“Our policy is to be neutral”
It is barely making the news, but Jewish donors to the Ivy League are discontinuing their giving, in numbers that will make the schools groan.
Statements attacking white people are still allowed on MLK day and Juneteenth however...
Notice that “student activism” is always left wing.
Always.
The school has been exposed for what it is. . . .ditching some professors and administrators, as well as conservative alums withholding contributions would be a good start.
You know, for an establishment of higher learning, it doesnt take them very long to realize when they have reeled out their huge hyper-educated penis and stepped all over it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.