Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Against The Law’: Jack Smith’s Staged Docs Photo Could Throw Major Wrench In Case Against Trump, Lawyers Say
Daily Caller ^ | May 10, 2024 | REAGAN REESE - WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT

Posted on 05/10/2024 5:48:47 AM PDT by Red Badger

Though all eyes have been on former President Donald Trump in a Manhattan courtroom, some are turning their attention to Trump’s classified documents case as it hits a series of major snags.

In a recent court filing, Jay Bratt, the lead Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutor now assigned to special counsel Jack Smith’s team, admitted that the FBI brought cover sheets reading “top secret” to its raid of Mar-a-Lago. The cover sheets, Bratt explained, were used as placeholders for the classified documents found at the scene. Now, both Trump’s defense and the special counsel are admitting that the documents seized from the former president’s residence are out of order, according to court documents first reported by Declassified with Julie Kelly.

The latest development could affect the integrity of the case in the view of both the court and the public, lawyers told the Daily Caller.

“It could [complicate the case]. I don’t know whether it will or not, but it certainly could,” John Malcolm, vice president for the Heritage Foundation’s Institute for Constitutional Government and former deputy assistant attorney general in the DOJ’s Criminal Division, told the Daily Caller.

“The allegation or the argument would be, they’ve tampered with the evidence they’ve affected its integrity in some material way. I mean, it would be as if they had messed with somebody else’s DNA sample or had smudged the fingerprint,” Malcolm continued.

Malcolm added that if the prosecution chooses to argue Trump had to have known about the documents because they were near files he would have seen all the time, the disordering of the evidence could cause problems.

“I don’t think anybody would believe that the President of the United States upon leaving office would personally be monitoring papers and effects. And it’s not inconceivable that something could get inadvertently mixed in,” Philip A. Holloway, a criminal defense attorney and legal analyst, told the Daily Caller.

“And so if prosecutors and law enforcement are cherry-picking documents, and slapping these labels on it that says top secret where that label was not already there, it can be very misleading to the viewer,” Holloway added. “And if that viewer is a court, then that’s misleading a court and that’s against the law.”

In the weeks following the raid, a photo of the crime scene at Mar-a-Lago went viral. The photo, snapped by the FBI, showed documents sprawled out with several of the “top secret” place holders among the mix.

Critics of the former president seized on the image, wondering how Trump could have possibly unknowingly brought such clearly marked documents out of the White House.

Crime scene photo showing classified documents found at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago. (U.S. National Archives)

“[Thirteen] boxes or containers contained documents with classification markings, and in all, over one hundred unique documents with classification markings…were seized. Certain of the documents had colored cover sheets indicating their classification status. See, e.g., Attachment F (redacted FBI photograph of certain documents and classified cover sheets recovered from a container in the ‘45 office’),” Bratt wrote in an August 2022 court filing.

But in a later filing, Bratt explained in more detail what those “colored cover sheets” were. They were the “top secret” sheets captured in the photo.

“[If] the investigative team found a document with classification markings, it removed the document, segregated it, and replaced it with a placeholder sheet. The investigative team used classified cover sheets for that purpose,” Bratt wrote in a recent filing.

In Kelly’s report, she analyzes Bratt’s language to describe the photo snapped at the Mar-a-Lago raid.

“In other words, in their zeal to stage a phony photo using official classified cover sheets, FBI agents might have failed to accurately match the placeholder sheet with the appropriate document. This is a potentially case-blowing mistake, particularly if the document in question is one of the 34 records that represents the basis of espionage charges against Trump,” Kelly writes.

Waltine Nauta, Trump’s defense attorney, wrote in a May filing that those “top secret” placeholders used by the FBI to mark classified documents in stacks were out of place.

Bratt admitted in a recent file that yes, the documents were rearranged in some capacity and not all of the files had been appropriately matched with a cover sheet. In many cases, Bratt said the FBI’s ordering was accurate.

“Special counsel Jack Smith and his counselor Jay Bratt could face severe consequences if it is proven true that they doctored evidence and presented it to the court and the public knowing it was doctored. They could face discipline from the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility. They could face sanctions from Judge Cannon and they could face criminal prosecution for obstruction of justice,” Mike Davis, former law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and founder of the Article III Project, told the Daily Caller.

Legal experts and political observers have often argued that the classified documents case was the most threatening to Trump of the several he faces, because the underlying crime was the most straightforward and had the most evidence. But now, the case is on hold until further notice.

Following the report, Judge Aileen Cannon moved to delay the former president’s classified documents case indefinitely. The trial, once scheduled to begin May 20, is now on hold so Cannon can continue to work through several pre-trial issues.

Though Cannon didn’t directly point to the out-of-order evidence as part of the reason for her delaying the case, the lawyers the Daily Caller spoke to felt it could have been a part of her reasoning.

“I suspect it was at least partially related to these issues. I suspect that this makes Judge Cannon less inclined to trust the credibility of what government lawyers tell her,” Holloway told the Daily Caller.

“It’s becoming more clear to the public that Judge Cannon has serious concerns with how Biden special counsel Jack Smith and his counselor, Jay Bratt are running this criminal prosecution against President Trump,” Davis told the Daily Caller.

“Judge Cannon seems to have serious concerns with potential grand jury abuse by Jack Smith and Jay Bratt in D.C. before this unprecedented indictment and Judge Cannon seems very concerned about issues around issues with tampered evidence, spoliation of evidence and chain of custody issues that are serious potential constitutional and ethical violations that could lead to the dismissal of this case,” Davis added.

With Trump still facing 91 criminal charges across four states, his legal team has had success in trying to delay the cases until after the 2024 election. In Georgia, an appeals court agreed to reconsider whether Fulton County district attorney Fani Willis should be disqualified from the state’s RICO case against Trump, pushing that trial back further.

While Cannon’s timeline for the case remains in limbo, some lawyers were confident that the document’s reshuffling wasn’t a favorable look for the prosecutor.

“It was certainly very foolish by the Special Counsel. I assume it was done negligently but it was very, very sloppy. When you have a documents case and part of it is going to be somebody’s knowledge that they had those documents in their possession, it would be very important to maintain it as close as possible in the original state in which they found them,” Malcolm told the Daily Caller.

Henry Rodgers contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bratt; cannon; mal; maralago; smith
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: alancarp

My guess is they wanted to create an impression of something that wasn’t. You know create a frame up situation. These people are power hungry MOFOs who will stoop to any level because they know no bounds of decency. They are true criminals, and dangerous criminals at that.


21 posted on 05/10/2024 6:18:05 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
From the article:

The latest development could affect the integrity of the case...

Could? Could?

The entire case should be dismissed immediately, with the prosecutors facing consequences for evidence tampering.
22 posted on 05/10/2024 6:18:21 AM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Just a matter of time before some “incident” pops up and she is forced out.


23 posted on 05/10/2024 6:18:31 AM PDT by Mathews (I have faith Malachi is right!!! Any day now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The entire case was STAGED, not just the photo. This was a political persecution by Biden from Day 1.


24 posted on 05/10/2024 6:19:48 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Yeah. This was suspected when the image first appeared way back when. When I saw that photo of documents, the first thing I didn't think of was negligence or sloppiness.

I thought focused purpose.

FBI SCENE COMMANDER: Okay. We have the box of documents from the Archives. Are there any surveillance devices in this room?

FBI AGENT 1: No sir. Sweep complete.

FBI SCENE COMMANDER: Very well. Let's proceed. Remember, no names. Agent 2?

FBI AGENT 2: Sir, I just checked. The documents with the elevated security classifications were inserted into the crate at the Archives right before it was shipped, and were right where they told us they would be.

FBI SCENE COMMANDER: Good. Was the shipping manifest modified to show the inclusion of those documents as instructed?

FBI AGENT 2: Even better, sir. Our agent taking care of the Archives process had the username and password of the Archives employee who created the manifest because he was watching porn. We presented him with a fake warrant and specified we needed his credentials to complete the investigation, and if he didn't talk to anyone, we were probably going to drop the whole thing. He won't talk to anyone. Instead of just making a fake manifest, we logged in as him and created a new real manifest. We also went back logged in as him and grabbed the documents and inserted them into the shipment under his name, and even modified in the database the actual requests from the Trump Team for those additional classified documents. So, the trail goes all the way back to Trump.

FBI SCENE COMMANDER: Strong work, Agent 2. Very good. Okay, let's get moving. Get those documents out of the crate. Put that box next to the toilet. Put those five boxes in the closet with the wooden shutters. Agent 1, unpack those ten boxes, and stack them sloppily on the floor over there.

FBI AGENT 1: Like this, sir? (points to five knee high stacks of unpacked and unevenly stacked documents, two of them toppled with the documents visible and scattered on the floor)

FBI SCENE COMMANDER: Good. Take several pictures to show how sloppy these storage procedures were. Wait. Before you take any pictures, mix in some of those CLASSIFIED, and TOP SECRET documents, and make sure the classification stamps are clearly visible in the photos.


25 posted on 05/10/2024 6:20:30 AM PDT by rlmorel (In Today's Democrat America, The $5 Dollar Bill is the New $1 Dollar Bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Hahahaha I began writing this while there were only three posts in the thread! The actual pictures look like the portrayal I posted!


26 posted on 05/10/2024 6:22:24 AM PDT by rlmorel (In Today's Democrat America, The $5 Dollar Bill is the New $1 Dollar Bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Even in Biden’s injustice system you cannot use fake evidence.


27 posted on 05/10/2024 6:28:16 AM PDT by bray (It's not racist to be racist against races you do not like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperk

She knows better. The crooked prosecutors would appeal and seek a different judge. Judge Cannon is being VERY smart. She controls the calendar of the trial. The setting of the calendar is not subject to appeal.


28 posted on 05/10/2024 6:38:20 AM PDT by Gnome1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Hahahaha I began writing this while there were only three posts in the thread! The actual pictures look like the portrayal I posted!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

how bout that?

no coincidents?

29 posted on 05/10/2024 6:41:55 AM PDT by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

thanx red


30 posted on 05/10/2024 6:43:20 AM PDT by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Not only that, the 34 documents seem to be from a pallet of NEW docs on a pallet that BIDEN HAD SENT THERE, not documents Trump had taken with him (as he had the right to do, as president)


31 posted on 05/10/2024 6:48:53 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperk

This case is going to get tossed or severely limited, ie, evidentiary sanctions. Judge is a Trump appointee. She knows she needs to move in that direction step by step to cut off commentary that she only acted politically (though that will be claimed anyway.) but in any case summary determination and/or terminating sanctions are severe and a judge should always approach it slowly and carefully


32 posted on 05/10/2024 6:49:03 AM PDT by j.havenfarm (23 years on Free Republic, 12/10/23! More than 8,000 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The DOJ got some splanen to do Lucy.

Many are starting to see how much the country is being like Cuba.


33 posted on 05/10/2024 6:52:46 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: healy61

I fully believe the DOJ and FBI would plant documents in the stack. “

They did not allow an audit on scene so there was nothing to prevent them adding anything they wanted to once they got the boxes into headquarters. Why the hell would they need “placeholders”, it’s just insulting The judge is playing it smart. She knows if she just tossed the case they would just find a rat Judge to bring it back


34 posted on 05/10/2024 6:55:57 AM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thinden

Absolutely.


35 posted on 05/10/2024 7:18:33 AM PDT by rlmorel (In Today's Democrat America, The $5 Dollar Bill is the New $1 Dollar Bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Trump needs to send every one of these corrupt bastards to prison.


36 posted on 05/10/2024 7:22:31 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperk

Likely won’t toss the case but could exclude “evidence” in my opinion. Then, ask Jack Smith if he has anything to proceed to trial with.


37 posted on 05/10/2024 7:24:50 AM PDT by gunnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Jay Bratt, the lead Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutor now assigned to special counsel Jack Smith’s team, admitted that the FBI brought cover sheets reading “top secret” to its raid of Mar-a-Lago.”

They were just props for the press photos.


38 posted on 05/10/2024 7:24:53 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They need to send Smith back to his “fries guy” job. He’s in over his head. Stay in your lane Jackie boy.


39 posted on 05/10/2024 7:28:49 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Weird how the invading hordes of illegal foreign deadbeats didn't start until FJB took the throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

“Jay Bratt, the lead Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutor now assigned to special counsel Jack Smith’s team, admitted that the FBI brought cover sheets reading “top secret” to its raid of Mar-a-Lago.”

They were just props for the press photos.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

so bratt admits they did have the intention to deceive, defraud & frame trump


40 posted on 05/10/2024 7:32:21 AM PDT by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson