Trump on Trial: The Jurors

TECHNO FOG on Substack ^ | TECHNO FOG

[Macho MAGA Man]

Jury selection has concluded in The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump. After a long voir dire, six jurors have been selected: three men and three women.

Here’s the brief summary, per media pool reports of the prospective jurors.

[No name given]

I believe so.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Waiting for Bragg to say, “We have assembled the most Diverse, Equitable and Inclusive jury in the history of New York jurisprudence.

[Fuzz]

Living in the nyc media market and being familiar with him. Read one of his books. Watched him flip on people and positions frequently. A shameless self promoter with no moral compass. Stuff like that.

[goodnesswins]

It is sad watching the judicial system fisintigrate before our eyes

[gcparent]

They are not done. Yes it’s 12. It’s 6 for civil.

[Reynoldo]

OH NO! AP NEWS, they always lie.

[Dr. Zzyzx]

I thought it was pretty good humor!

[Reynoldo]

What does it take to conclude that this is not a jury of peers?

Where would one go to find a jury of his peers?

[kiryandil]

Well, one, I discussed why the prosecutor argued it was applicable and why the judge allowed the transcript to be entered into evidence.

Like any good Democrat supporter, your "explanation" had some stuff "fall out".

To wit: "but [he, "Cartel Merch" Merchan] said prosecutors could introduce the exact words that Trump said, meaning so long as jurors don’t hear the recording itself, it’s fair game."

Which is NOT the same as "allow[ing] the transcript to be entered into evidence".

At all.

[Fuzz]

Posts like the one I commented on are too frequently believed and are brought up later on as being factual. Usually preceded by, I read somewhere……

[Reynoldo]

After 18 jurors are selected.

[napscoordinator]

That’s actually the worst part of the entire mess. That judge is nasty.

[Fuzz]

Who are you quoting?

Not me.

Second, the cartel slur is just stupid. You continue to do it though. He came here when he was 6.

[cross_bearer_02]

Modern day Nuremberg trial. I must disagree. The Nuremberg trials were righteous and just in bringing to justice some of the worst criminals the world has ever seen (up to perhaps now, some might argue). This is more a modern-day star chamber. A modern Nuremberg trial would not be to the leftist devils’ likings.

[kiryandil]

Who are you quoting?

Not me.

So, you prefer to remain with your Democrat lie-by-omission.

Fair enough.

He came here when he was 6.

His father was Columbian military - plenty of room fo cartel influence there.

PS - perhaps you could show Macho MAGA Man and I where on the doll that Donald Trump touched you.

[wiseprince]

I think your best bet is to get a black man on the Jury. Most likely to be an under cover Trump supporter. As a question ask them if theh listen to 50 cent.

[Judge Bean]

It is NOT a jury of his peers.

[Prince of Space]

Who is the arbiter of “nonsense?”

[Fuzz]

Bono.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

That is the only purpose of the trial, to tie Trump down. They know it’s a stupid case that will be reversed, but the process is the punishment.