Posted on 04/15/2024 6:45:33 PM PDT by bitt
Countdown to the left convincing some confused kid to kill themselves so that they can score political points starts now.
Terrible idea. We’ve arguing for years that unless there’s some sort of state corruption that necessitates it or an overwhelming national interest or a Constititutional provision that mandates it, it’s best to keep the federal government out of it. Laws like these should be decided state by state. Obviously the entire practice of legalized insanity, normalizing mental illness & the abusive mitilation of minors is repulsive & should never be allowed. But the Constitutionall correct place to pass those sorts of laws is on a state level by each of the 50 legislatures. That means that California, New York & Massachusetts will probably keep it legal- that’s their right. However, it also protects the principle that they don’t have the right to come in to Texas, Tennessee & Florida & tell us what to do! 😉
Terrible idea. We’ve arguing for years that unless there’s some sort of state corruption that necessitates it or an overwhelming national interest or a Constititutional provision that mandates it, it’s best to keep the federal government out of it. Laws like these should be decided state by state. Obviously the entire practice of legalized insanity, normalizing mental illness & the abusive mitilation of minors is repulsive & should never be allowed. But the Constitutionall correct place to pass those sorts of laws is on a state level by each of the 50 legislatures. That means that California, New York & Massachusetts will probably keep it legal- that’s their right. However, it also protects the principle that they don’t have the right to come in to Texas, Tennessee & Florida & tell us what to do! 😉
Maybe, maybe not....all the states have murder statutes so the Feds should not have theirs? A state should have the right to declare murder legal? Not that “cut & dried”.
https://www.johntfloyd.com/federal-vs-state-murder-prosecutions-differences-and-implications/
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-51
[A rare bit of sanity from SCOTUS. Surprisingly, Roberts didn’t vote with the libtards.]
Yes. Both of those things are shocking.
Excellent. Every red state needs to ban such medical malpractice, ban the teaching of this pernicious ideology in state schools and harshly punish anyone who mutilates a child.
Thank you President Trump.
“I agree, it should have been 9-0.”
Concur, but I will take 6-3 every day of the week.
3 should be impeached.
There should be a federal law protecting children from killing and mutilation - all children.
Without looking ... was it the Wise Latina, the Jewish Lesbian, and the Negro Non-biologist?
A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed Idaho to mostly enforce a law that bans gender-affirming health care for transgender teens.
thank goodness!
should have been 9-0 in any sane world against child genital mutilation
yet...
In any sane world the Courts would have laughed and said "please! You can't mutilate or chemically castrate children, or adults for that matter. Case closed."
This is all Trump’s fault! We must thank him.
What a headline, CNBC is pack of leftist rats just like the others.
Jesus recomends tying a millstone around their necks and dropping them into deep water.
I really LIKE the idea of States Rights. (It’s NOT a new concept, People!)
Let each State make the decision on any and ALL of these morally bankrupt, contrived issues by Socialist Democrats.
Let’s separate the sheep from the goats and let everyone show their True Colors.
Matthew 25:31-46
Yes, but there’s at least one SC justice who doesn’t know what a woman is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.