Posted on 03/16/2024 5:49:39 AM PDT by airdalecheif
The following story illustrates the reality of the insane world of the woke in today's America and our desensitized reaction to it.
(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...
Marriage exists in every culture on Earth.
The Fessor needs to contact the psychiatric dept for help.
“Marriage fundamentalism,” argues Professor Bethany Letiecq, is an “ideology and cultural phenomenon in which adherents espouse the superiority of the two-parent married family.”
This is correct. Then she goes off the rails. Why is it impossible for educated people to admit they are wrong?
Without reading the article, I would have to say that marriage and strong family units do create supremacy for the culture that practices those tenets, regardless of race.
I can understand his logic. The goal.is to justify and promote his bigotry against tradition. Not having any valid grounds for this desire, but being blessed with an abundant capacity for rationalizations, he picks something that is universally rejected in his culture and associates his target with it.
Universities morphed from “institutes of higher learning” into cesspools of disinformation with most professors just turds floating around in it.
Keep in mind those outrageous student loan debts are paying for this asshat.
The radical woke are HELLBENT…
[W]hat the HELL is wrong with these people…
The Wokesters are in a race to the bottom, with each one trying to outdo the next in their collective civilizational “reductio ad absurdum.”
interesting take. wondering now how to deal with the off white paints vs pure whites. being an antique white has its privileges too. just sayin’.
Just another Gibberish Professor ,LOL
“White Supremacy” is just a woke buzzword meaning “Western Civilization”.
The professor is an educated fool.
The professor says two-parent minority couples don’t enjoy the advantages that two-parent white couples enjoy. This is an easily testable hypothesis. Just compare the success of minority children born and raised in two-parent households to the success of other minority children born and raised to one-parent households.
I’ll summarize the literature:
In studies involving large samples taken from the general populations two-parent households are associated with success of children whether or not conditioned on race or ethnicity.
In studies involving small samples of this kind of child (e.g., gifted) or that kind of household (e.g., financially-strained), success is sometimes found to be independent of one- or two-parent household.
What the latter studies ignore is that one- versus two-parent households affect things such as giftedness and financial condition.
If this helps, I’ll put this into abstract terms:
If X causes Y and Y causes Z, then X indirectly causes Z through Y.
Of course, racists will say logic is white, along with 2 + 2 = 4, math in general, facts, science, history, and reality.
BTW the professor concedes two-parent households confer advantages to whites. So, if you are white, consider how important is bringing children into the world in the context of a two-parent household.
If you aren’t white, think about whether you believe in the American principle that all men are created equal and whether there must be something wrong with an argument that minorities are actually different from whites. If you don’t believe in this principle, please leave. We like the principles on which this country was founded. And we have struggled through the still short history of this country to make these principles into reality. We are NOT going back.
When we remember that the first goal is Marxism is the destruction of Western (i.e., Judeo/Christian) civilization, it becomes clear why the Marxists are pushing LGBTQ/Wokeism/DEI, etc. These weak, incompetent men and their angry, entitled sisters are great for destroying the current world.
But once the Marxists have installed their regime, the LGBTQ/Woke/DEI faction will be the first on the death camp boxcars.
The LGBTQ/Woke/DEI are just temporary soldiers designed to destroy the system. They are worthless otherwise and the Marxists know this full-well.
In contrast, postmodernist worldviews challenge the notion of a fixed and universal definition of the traditional family. They emphasize the diversity of family structures and reject the idea that there is a "normal" or ideal family model. Postmodernists argue that the traditional family is a social construct that is shaped by power dynamics, cultural norms, and historical context. Their goal is to deconstruct and destabilize traditional family structures by recognizing and valuing alternative family forms, such as single-parent households, same-sex families, and chosen families. Postmodernists advocate for the freedom to define and create one's own family arrangements based on personal choices and preferences, rather than conforming to societal expectations [3][5].
1 The Legacy of John Lennon by David Noebel text, i-163...
2 Worldviews by Ninian Smart text, i-190...
3 The Universe Next Door, 5th Edition, by James W. Sire text, i-293...
4 Understanding The Times, Revised 2nd Edition by David Noebel text, i-510...
5 Seven Theories Human Nature by Leslie Stevenson text, i-128...
6 The Universe Next Door, 4th Edition, by James W. Sire text, i-259...
She has thighs that KFC would covet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.