Posted on 03/06/2024 2:25:15 PM PST by xoxox
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) quietly updated its federal COVID-19 guidelines to recommend treating the virus similarly to the flu, vindicating years of dissident opinion and undermining the original justification for drastically upending Americans’ lives in its name.
Declaring that COVID is “no longer the emergency that it once was, and its health impacts increasingly resemble those of other respiratory viral illnesses,” the new guidance says COVID’s threat is now “more similar to that of other common respiratory viruses,” justifying the agency’s decision to issue a general “Respiratory Virus Guidance, rather than additional virus-specific guidance.” It admits that “states and countries that have already shortened recommended isolation times have not seen increased hospitalizations or deaths related to COVID-19.”
Gonna make it tough to force early and absentee voting when the plague only now requires a one day quarantine.
Well, first, what do you even mean by “deaths now vs. then”?
Without even knowing you or answer, I’d say that when it comes to “COVID”, deaths are sort of like votes in the old Soviet Union: it’s not the deaths that matter, it’s who counts the deaths, and more importantly, what they choose to blame them on.
1200 flu deaths in 2021. Riiiiight.
Just the flu, bro/sis :-)
Remember when we were berated, by the FRocs/$hills for saying this exact thing, three years ago?
Good times.
It’s called an opinion. Gaslighting is what the media, the government, and a whole bunch of clowns here on FR have engaged in for over four years.
If there is/was a massive clinical trial they have been very quite about how successful this vaccine has been.
And it must have been successful because they are still offering the vaccine.
Or am I wrong?
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled CDC finally admits COVID can be treated like the flu, DugwayDuke wrote: ransomnote wrote: “ The PCR test was not an actual medical diagnostic test but was a lab tool misappropriated for the scamdemic. “
There are other tests besided the PCR.
Besides there is no record of Kary Mullis saying the PCR test could not detect COVID. After all, he died in 2019 prior to the emergence of the virus. The best records indicate Mullis did make a similar statement that PCR wasn’t useful for detecting HIV back in 1997 when Mullis was a HIV/AIDS denier. His point was, if you ran the PCR test enough times you might detect something. However, the PCR tests used for diagnosing COVID are not run to extreme levels.
Here’s a fact check:
https://fullfact.org/online/kary-mullis-anyone-PCR-test/There are multiple PCR tests. The World Health Organization included the human genome in its Covid PCR test which means that detecting human DNA in a patient could render a 'positive' result.
Kary Mullis is on video saying that the PCR could not be used to diagnose AIDS or ANY OTHER DISEASE for that matter. Aids was Fauci's other cottage business and that's why Mullis despised him. Kary explained the PCR is an assay used to detect the tiniest amounts of material in a sample that would otherwise be missed by exaggerating the presence of that material. So, the 'related corona virus' that the CDC used, instead of the actual Covid virus, in the PCR should possibly detect a fragment of a variety of related corona viruses, or not, 2 months after a person had recovered from a corona virus related illness, or even if the person had been exposed but never became ill.
I think you made up the part about Mullis talking about 'extreme levels'. I watched his videos. By the way, the CDC really did run the PCR test at 'extreme levels'. Even Fauci muttered, 'well at 40 cycles only nucleotides would remain....' And yes, the CDC ran the tests at 40 cycles. But then when their toxic 'Covid' shots were released, the vaccinated patients' tests were run at lower levels, and the unvaccinated samples were run at 40 cycles. Go figure, Pharma Troll.
The Covid 'PCR' test was worthless world-wide. The president of Tanzania directed his medical experts to test it on water, motor oil, goats, papaya etc. and it proved to be unreliable. School children got a positive Covid test on the PCR when they tested orange juice. Others have reported 'Spanish water' and coca cola tested positive. WORTHLESS...all of them.
“COVID Was a Government DEEPSTATE PCR-Manufactured Fraud” – Says Dr Paul Alexander.
“I Agree with Yeadon, I agree With Rancourt,” says Dr Alexander, “There NEVER Was a Pandemic. never, & not even an emergency! COVID was a government DEEPSTATE PCR-manufactured fraud of a 0.05% […]
Emails in 2020 blow the covid PCR test scam out of the water
In September 2020, Professor Martin Neil received some anonymous emails providing hard evidence that the PCR tests for covid were never accurate or fit for purpose. “Some of the [test] sequences are […]
Covid Lies: Autopsies, PCR Test, Cause of Death and Hospital Protocols
“Ignoring this and hoping it will go away is naïve and very dangerous for us all. The perpetrators have not gone away and will likely return in the fall. I expect this […]
Covid Lies: Asymptomatic Spread and PCR Tests Identify Infections
“Given the foregoing, it is no longer possible to view the last two years as well-intentioned errors. Instead, the objectives of the perpetrators are most likely to be totalitarian control over the […]
The PCR Scam: PCR Does Not Detect SARS-CoV-2.
Governments worldwide have used the PCR as a tool to enable “cases” of a “novel” virus to be created. These “cases” have successfully incited fear resulting in malleable populations ready to accept […]
Fauci Admits PCR Test Cannot Detect Infection
Since the beginning of the pandemic, experts have warned that the PCR test is not a valid diagnostic tool and produces far too many false positives, as it can pick up on […]
PCR Tests Have Served Their Purpose in the Covid “Crisis”, They’re Now Being Cancelled – Everywhere
On 7 July 2021 the CDC updated their “Instructions for Use” of RT-PCR Covid tests. This was the exact date the CDC notified clinical laboratories and testing sites performing Covid testing of […]
Did you Know: Last Year Covid PCR Tests Were Erroneously Testing for Bacteria So Had to Be Recalled
On 30 December 2020, QIAGEN issued an Urgent Field Safety Notice regarding a batch of their Covid tests: “In some cartridges, the reaction chamber that should hold the reaction mix for the […]
Nope. But keep up your agenda. I’ve stated this was a nasty virus. I’ve also stated people lied about its origin and when it started. Those are not mutually exclusive positions, but you somehow want to make it that way.
Updated for completely different time periods, completely different stages of the virus' potency and severity of symptoms, completely different levels of immunity among the population, etc. And this publication actually applies the current situation to the initial situation as though they were the same.
Typical nonsense from this publication - and completely shameless.
Believe it or not believe those things - conflating completely different time periods, stage of viral potency, immunity, etc. is at best very stupid and at worst very dishonest. That is what this article does.
So you post a notoriously and consistently fake news website as evidence?
Here’s what a PCR test actually is and how it works:
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=h_&q=What+is+the+PCR+test&ia=web
They’ve been around far longer than COVID.
Your comments about Kary Mullis saying the PCR test could not be used to detect “any disease” is also false. He didn’t say that. He was talking specifically about what he claimed were issues with using it to detect HIV, which was already pointed out to you. Moreover, Mullis at the time of those remarks also believed HIV did not cause AIDS, which has is a belief long since discredited, which makes even those remarks outdated and inaccurate, even if you buy into twisting them to say the test doesn’t detect any disease.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=h_&q=Kary+Mullis+PCR+test&ia=web
Nothing you seem to ever say has any accuracy to it.
Couldn’t you have said “Teutonic” and invited SERKIT?
SERKIT, courtesy ping at one remove.
I have behavioral issues.
too little, too late, too much blood and treasure on their hands.
The last time I had covid, I was prescribed Flonase and ZyrTEC.
“How do you explain the difference in deaths now vs. then?”
Probably because everything at the time no matter the actual cause was labeled as a “covid related” death to feed the fear porn.
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled CDC finally admits COVID can be treated like the flu, Republican Wildcat wrote: So you post a notoriously and consistently fake news website as evidence?
Here’s what a PCR test actually is and how it works:
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=h_&q=What+is+the+PCR+test&ia=web
They’ve been around far longer than COVID.
Your comments about Kary Mullis saying the PCR test could not be used to detect “any disease” is also false. He didn’t say that. He was talking specifically about what he claimed were issues with using it to detect HIV, which was already pointed out to you. Moreover, Mullis at the time of those remarks also believed HIV did not cause AIDS, which has is a belief long since discredited, which makes even those remarks outdated and inaccurate, even if you buy into twisting them to say the test doesn’t detect any disease.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=h_&q=Kary+Mullis+PCR+test&ia=web
Nothing you seem to ever say has any accuracy to it.
Your 'duckduckgo' takedown is worthless as it cites CDC links and MSM lackeys, just like you do.
I researched the PCR and Mullis did say it was a laboratory assay and not a medical diagnostic test and could not be used to diagnose disease.
My links discuss in detail why your post is pharma lies, and you are a pharma liar. You could take the easy route and explain why the CDC said it used 'related corona viruses' and not the 'covid virus' to create the PCR, saying at the time that the Covid virus was 'not available. But you won't - you'll just quote the CDC indirectly, by posting DUCKDUCKGO.
“COVID Was a Government DEEPSTATE PCR-Manufactured Fraud” – Says Dr Paul Alexander.
“I Agree with Yeadon, I agree With Rancourt,” says Dr Alexander, “There NEVER Was a Pandemic. never, & not even an emergency! COVID was a government DEEPSTATE PCR-manufactured fraud of a 0.05% […]
Emails in 2020 blow the covid PCR test scam out of the water
In September 2020, Professor Martin Neil received some anonymous emails providing hard evidence that the PCR tests for covid were never accurate or fit for purpose. “Some of the [test] sequences are […]
Covid Lies: Autopsies, PCR Test, Cause of Death and Hospital Protocols
“Ignoring this and hoping it will go away is naïve and very dangerous for us all. The perpetrators have not gone away and will likely return in the fall. I expect this […]
Covid Lies: Asymptomatic Spread and PCR Tests Identify Infections
“Given the foregoing, it is no longer possible to view the last two years as well-intentioned errors. Instead, the objectives of the perpetrators are most likely to be totalitarian control over the […]
The PCR Scam: PCR Does Not Detect SARS-CoV-2.
Governments worldwide have used the PCR as a tool to enable “cases” of a “novel” virus to be created. These “cases” have successfully incited fear resulting in malleable populations ready to accept […]
Fauci Admits PCR Test Cannot Detect Infection
Since the beginning of the pandemic, experts have warned that the PCR test is not a valid diagnostic tool and produces far too many false positives, as it can pick up on […]
PCR Tests Have Served Their Purpose in the Covid “Crisis”, They’re Now Being Cancelled – Everywhere
On 7 July 2021 the CDC updated their “Instructions for Use” of RT-PCR Covid tests. This was the exact date the CDC notified clinical laboratories and testing sites performing Covid testing of […]
Did you Know: Last Year Covid PCR Tests Were Erroneously Testing for Bacteria So Had to Be Recalled
On 30 December 2020, QIAGEN issued an Urgent Field Safety Notice regarding a batch of their Covid tests: “In some cartridges, the reaction chamber that should hold the reaction mix for the […]
One of the most accurate descriptions of that particular shill that I've sen to date
I did catch an interview with Elon Musk, he asked doctor's what they learned about the death's concerning “COVID”.”
Their answer was the (drum roll please, SPOILER ALERT, your not going to like the answer.)
"Putting patients on ventilators did MUCH MORE HARM, than good."
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled CDC finally admits COVID can be treated like the flu, DugwayDuke wrote: EEGator wrote: “If you admit the variants, then you admit the vaccine was never a cure.”
DD: Vaccines have never been a cure.
ransomnote: The Covid 'vaccine' is not a vaccine. The FTC filing stated that the mRNA platform was gene therapy, but permitted the use of the term 'vaccine' in order to avoid 'vaccine hesitancy.'
EEGator was pointing to the fact that the Covid 'vaccines' did not work and that was known from the start.
~~~~~~~~~
EEGator wrote: “Originally it was stated that it would prevent one from becoming ill. It was a blatant lie and you know it.”
DD: There has never been a vaccine that was 100% effective in preventing illness.
ransomnote: EEGator did not assert there was a vaccine that was 100% effective in preventing illness, so why did you try to refute him with the counter statement? I think it's because he pointed to the blatant lies the CDC knowingly pushed and you had no way to refute him. The world heard the lies - a shill like you can't drown them out now.
EEGator wrote: “Vaccines are supposed to undergo long term testing, of at least 5 years, prior to full approval.”
DD: There is nothing in law that requires five years of testing. The only requirements are that certain steps must be completed. The COVID vaccines went through all those steps. The difference was, some steps were conducted in parallel rather than sequentually to save time. But, you knew that.
ransomnote: EEGator did not assert that the law required a set period of testing, so why did you attempt to refute him? I think it's because you knew that the issue behind the ridiculously brief trial period was the impact on safety and effectiveness. The Covid 'vaccine' development could only have occurred that quickly because it skipped many steps, for example sequential testing and data collection/observation of patients over the course of years, instead of 2- 3 months.(Don't you remember the 'discovery' the CDC announced that immunity dropped after 4 or months or so? They were shocked because they never tested it long enough to know before they injected billions. The time consuming standard testing of vaccines is of course absolutely critical to the safety and effectiveness issue because claiming a 'vaccine' protects someone based on 3 months of observation doesn't mean anything at the 4 month mark and safety issues (impacts to fertility) can take years to determine (birth defects etc).
Conducting steps in parallel interferes with validity, and devious steps like vaccinating the control groups, negates the usefullness of the pointless, low-grade, for-show 'drug trials'.
One of the tests that the pharmas did not conduct was bio-accumulation of the spike proteins. That hit the news because Japan refused to purchase the vax unless the pharma conducted this standard test, which only takes about 24 hours to complete. So the pharma conducted the bio-accummulation test requested by Japan and revealed that the spike proteins collect in vital organs along with testes, ovaries etc.
There was nothing standard or professional about the Covid 'vaccine' trials - that's why Pfizer wanted to delay the release of trial information normally made available to the public by 75 years. None of the MSM or shills like you admit that information has now been exposed and it reveals the dirty deeds the FDA/Pharma/CDC knew about, but hid from the public.
Walensky (CDC) stated on video which I posted that she knew of no reason that the vax would not be safe for pregnant women - Walensky lied. Fauci lied. You lied. You're lying.
EEGator wrote: “What’s the average timeline from beginning to fully approved vaccines in the history of the FDA?”
DD: Time isn’t a requirement, the specific steps to be performed in testing are the requirements.
ransomnote: The specific steps to be peformed in testing are not the only requirements. Industry stanards and logical progression, careful collection of data etc are some of the additional factors required. Normal, standard steps performed in vaccine trials take 5 years or more to complete. The FDA helped Pharmas just skip all that and conduct whatever it wanted in a matter of months, then helped them hide the damaging results from the public.
For example, Peter Doshi noticed that a very large cohort of people who became ill after Pfizer's 'vaccine' administration were statistically eliminated from consideration because they will ill but had a negative Covid test (recall, the Covid test did not use the actual covid virus in development so the PCR was designed to identify a 'related Corona Virus). So Pfizer couldn't know what illness(es) a large number of vaccinated sick people came down with - so it ignored them when calculating 'vaccine' success. Researchers who claw this information into the public sphere are astounced at the indifference Pfizer and the FDA, Moderna showed in their race to force the vax on the public.
We could just cut to the chase. The mRNA platform never suceeded in protecting a single patient from any disease before it was forced on the public with mandates etc. The reason the mRNA had never been tried on the public before was that it was too harmful to the animals tested. It wasn't safe enough. The animals sickened and died. That is the platform which was selected to force up on the entire world after a few months of testing.
EEGator is certainly right about your duplicity. But you knew that.
It just seemed the proper response.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.