Posted on 02/26/2024 9:02:55 AM PST by janetjanet998
Several NATO and EU members are "considering sending troops to Ukraine" on a "bilateral basis
Slovakia's PM Robert Fico added, "I cannot say for what purpose and what they should be doing there," after making the claims.
The attitude is the same as 1941 Roosevelt declared a “Security Zone” into the Mid-Atlantic sent out the US Navy to escort British convoys.
The Marines landed in Iceland the Army deployed to Bermuda and Trinidad and Newfoundland.
It was FDR saying I dare you Hitler to hit back.
US merchant and naval ships a few got attacked in the fall of 1941 Americans died before December 7th triggered German entry into WW II against the USA.
But there is no honest way to compare Nazi Germany to Putin’s Russia whose WW II heritage is the fighting of Nazis including Ukrainian Nationalist Nazis.
Hell no, Pedo Joe!
To Ukraine, I won’t go!
There’s no trust there. Since 2014 Ukraine has been a situation of mutually assured blackmail between corrupt US and NATO officials (see whose relative have no-jobs in Ukraine) and Ukranian kleptocrats (see who has fancy houses elsewhere) with the underpinnings of destroying Russia as one of the last obstacles to global neofeudalism (and all the other evil **** they have done and still do).
They proceed because they have to proceed because the personal consequences if the truth came out are absolute.
“The Ukies” elected this the same way we “elected” to have our country invaded and subverted, the same way the Europeans “elected” a bunch of people who are trying to simultaneously starve and replace them.
It seems to me the only ones that want a nuke war are Pro Putin trolls on FR as they keep harping on it.
Not trye.
And no need for nukes if NATO troops aren’t there.
Only bloodthirsty morons want war with Russia.
Thank you.
Do you think these projected future production numbers meet what the Ukes need in terms of fieldpiece tube replacements and artillery shells to match or out do the Russians at the front?
these idiots want ww3.
russia woyld have every legal right to strike them
Zelensky and his handlers sure like sending white Christian men to their deaths.
Ukraine needs at least 8,000 155mm artillery shells per week.
When Ukraine had some inventory, Ukraine used 6,000 - 7,000 per week in the stretch of the offense -type weather pattern during 2023.
When Ukraine was really pressed, and had inventory, Ukraine used 8,000 per week.
Ukraine also needs 10’s of thousands of shoulder-launched anti-air missiles, and a like number of vehicle-launched anti-air missiles.
Russia took a gamble, using air power to launch glide -bombs, a number of which, were thermobaric, on Avdiivka. And the Russian gamble worked.
Because Ukraine did not have anywhere near the amount of forward anti-air systems, available.
That is also a major reason for the Ukraine offensive in 2023: Ukraine troops were sent forward with some anti-armor, should-launced missiles, but an incredible lack of anti-air missiles.
In 2023, Russian helicopters worked over:
- advanced Ukraine positions
- advancing Ukrainians
- advancing Ukraine vehicles
During that offensive, Ukraine military vehicles used for transporting the wounded, were assigned drivers from various foreign countries. The drivers DID NOT SPEAK NOR UNDERSTAND Ukrainian, Russian. A few knew English.
The communications problems led to several Ukraine vehicles lingering or wandering about, instead of working efficiently.
They were easy targets for Russian helicopters.
Ukraine did not have *dedicated* anti-air teams using shoulder launched missiles - to accompany assault troops.
Ukraine troops would approach Russian positions, close enough to be in contact (combat) with Russians, and along comes a Russian helicopter at low altitude.
Ukraine troops could not adjust, while being fired upon from a nearby trench, and fire an anti-air missile at the helo.
There was no position, a bit further back (200 - 300 meters) from the assault position, and thus, not being in contact, where a Ukraine anti-air, shoulder-launched team could focus upon the Russian helicopter.
The helo also reporting Ukraine assault positions to Russian artillery.
Russia lost a lot of helicopters and crews, but Russia stopped the Ukraine assaults in enough places, to significantly dampen Ukraine assault gains.
Meanwhile, the “military ambulance” situation for Ukraine, was a circus. Medical care for Ukraine troops, good, but transport significantly delayed - re situations where drivers and wounded do not speak the same language.
Not the case everywhere, but definitely in the areas of the front where Ukraine hoped to penetrate and advance toward Mariupol and Crimea.
Russia has advantage in artillery ammo supply and troops supply.
Ukraine has advantage in creativity and ingenuity.
But, Russia does learn - studying Ukraine’s wins.
And, Ukraine suffers by not having the resources to deal with what Ukraine learns about Russian successes.
IMHO
He will target any/all hostile troops in Ukraine that he can reach.
These are countries that are already killing themselves without fighting the Russians.
Peacenik bosheviks
Cracking down on Russia / Israel
Countries that are Judeo - Christians
Global gay marxism is what it’s all about
Gog 666 usa
MaGog 666 nato / Un
Rev 13
Ps
Great dem Satan usa
BNO News
@BNONews
Subscribe
French President Macron says sending Western troops to Ukraine should not be “ruled out” for the future, but no consensus today
And Now, you too can join the fight.
Paid for by the uniparty (Disclaimer: don't expect them to join you in the fight)
“NEOCONS/CIA/NED/USAID/MIC/StateDept Inc - making and/or taking advantage of corrupt countries since the 50s.
And Now, you too can join the fight.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Here is another version you might prefer:
-Russian Neocons/KGB-FSB/Rossotrudnichestvo/RussianMIC/Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MID)-
So how its gonna be?
You can’t be neutral on this planet my FRiend.
Thus... which version do you chose?
US Necons and US MIC etc..
or
Russian Neocons and Russian MIC etc...
The choice is yours...
NATO should send troops to Lviv and Kyiv. That means the troops should be mostly from Poland, Germany and England. So that way the Russians can’t use the territory in Belarus to attack Ukraine from the north.
2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive
George Washington wouldn't have done the counteroffensive. Instead, he would have focused on Crimea but in form of guerilla warfare. The Ukrainians have been doing that and that's effective. And George Washington would have done more to launch attacks into Belgorod which means that the war is going to impact the civilians in Russia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.