Posted on 02/14/2024 4:59:51 PM PST by Ennis85
A conservative group has told a Georgia judge that it doesn't have evidence to support its claims of illegal ballot stuffing during the the 2020 general election and a runoff two months later.
Texas-based True the Vote filed complaints with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in 2021, including one in which it said it had obtained “a detailed account of coordinated efforts to collect and deposit ballots in drop boxes across metro Atlanta” during the November 2020 election and a January 2021 runoff.
A Fulton County Superior Court judge in Atlanta signed an order last year requiring True the Vote to provide evidence it had collected, including the names of people who were sources of information, to state elections officials who were frustrated by the group's refusal to share evidence with investigators. In their written response, attorneys for True the Vote said the group had no names or other documentary evidence to share.
“Once again, True the Vote has proven itself untrustworthy and unable to provide a shred of evidence for a single one of their fairy-tale allegations," Raffensperger spokesman Mike Hassinger said Wednesday. "Like all the lies about Georgia’s 2020 election, their fabricated claims of ballot harvesting have been repeatedly debunked.”
True the Vote’s assertions were relied upon heavily for “2000 Mules,” a widely debunked film by conservative pundit and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza. A State Election Board investigation found that surveillance camera footage that the film claimed showed ballot stuffing actually showed people submitting ballots for themselves and family members who lived with them, which is allowed under Georgia law.
The election board subpoenaed True the Vote to provide evidence that would assist it in investigating the group's ballot trafficking allegations.
True the Vote's complaint said its investigators "spoke with several individuals regarding personal knowledge, methods,
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Liberals grift off the government. Conservatives grift off their voters.
Yup. Sources usually will not go on record because of risks to their jobs and careers and their own complicity in civil and criminal wrongdoing.
You respond just like a leftist when confronted by truths you can’t handle. Nothing but inchoate profanities. Do some research. Start with Greg Phillips.
Is this like when the Maricopa County Judge Peter Thompson made the rules for the case so narrow that he could say there wasn’t anything wrong with the 2022 AZ Governor’s race?
“Widely debunked film?”
“You have to remember that Rattenspewer and his minions were INTENSELY interested in obtaining the name of one of the ballot box stuffers who came clean to True The Vote.
And it wasn’t because they wanted to expose vote fraud...“
THIS
Says the ignorant asshole who doesn’t even know what a GPS coordinate is.
After I do all that, I’m gonna need a shower. Grody!
Surprise, surprise, surprise.
Without evidence, what do you change?
We don’t have the option to just ignore it. Because if we don’t understand it fully and accept it, we won’t succeed.
There are certain protocols that can listen, but cannot talk at the same time. Like a CB radio. That is called “half-duplex”.
And there are other protocols that can both talk and listen at the same time. That is “full-duplex”.
Effective action in today’s world calls us to operate in full-duplex mode. Which requires understanding the past at the same time we seek to understand the present.
We have to multitask to do it right. Leftists, like some of the jackwads we see on this thread, don’t bother. They just roar ahead at half-duplex. They ignore the past, because they don’t think there are any valid lessons to be learned from it. And they make progress towards their goals.
But they always fail in the end, because they never learn about the past.
We should avoid making the mistake of thinking we can ignore the past and chart a successful path to the future.
Not only are you foul, but a liar.
Yeah. It is an unclean, but necessary process.
In other words, TTV refused to provide names of protected sources, to protect them from retribution.
Catherine and Gregg were handcuffed and imprisoned for refusing to divulge name of a protected source.
Catherine was forced to shower in front of male guards.
Are you even curious about the mathematical impossibility of Joe Biden's "victory?"
Nah. You will just stick your head back into your stinking hole, and we won’t hear from you again for a while until you think it is safe enough to come out.
Show me how it was done. That’s all I ask. Problem is, you can’t. And a key player in all this now suddenly can’t provide evidence for their claims. And likely because what they claimed it didn’t happen.
"Someone who thinks he’s bright, but after having some interaction with him, realized he doesn’t know squat. And worse, he doesn’t know it."
The ballot stuffing is almost impossible to prove. ‘24 will be the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.