Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitch McConnell and Senate RINOs Help Pass Ukraine Funding Package that Includes Language for Automatic Impeachment if Trump Terminates Funding for Ukraine War!
Gateway Pundit ^ | eb. 12, 2024 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 02/12/2024 10:15:17 AM PST by Kazan

In an unusual session held on Super Bowl Sunday, the US Senate voted to move forward a substantial $95 billion aid package that will support Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, with no southern border security provisions. The package includes $60 billion for Ukraine and $14 billion for Israel. The vote garnered support from RINOs, with a final tally of 67-27.

According to The Hill, Schumer offered Republicans the chance to vote on amendments in exchange for expediting the legislative process.

“By a vote of 67-27, The Senate invoked cloture on Murray substitute amendment 1388 to H.R.815, legislative vehicle for supplemental appropriations,” the Senate Press Gallery wrote on X.

Sixty-seven senators voted in favor of war funding, while 27 senators opposed the expenditure, all of whom were Republicans.

On Super Bowl Sunday, the following 18 Republican senators supported the Ukraine war funding:

Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV)
Bill Cassidy (R-LA)
Susan Collins (R-ME)
John Cornyn (R-TX)
Joni Ernst (R-IA)
Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
John Kennedy (R-LA)
Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
Jerry Moran (R-KS)
Markwayne Mullin (R-OK)
Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
Mitt Romney (R-UT)
Mike Rounds (R-SD)
Dan Sullivan (R-AK)
John Thune (R-SD)
Thom Tillis (R-NC)
Roger Wicker (R-MS)
Todd Young (R-IN)

The legislation passed cloture in a rare Super Bowl Sunday vote.

On Monday morning, Trump-supporting Senator J.D. Vance (R-OH) posted a stunning report on X. According to Senator Vance, the Senate funding package includes language that makes it impossible for President Trump to terminate the Ukraine War funding into his second term.

The language was inserted into the aid package with President Trump in mind. These dirty RINOs and Democrats voted on a bill that will send endless billions to Ukraine no matter how dire the situation is on the ground.

“Buried in the bill’s text is an impeachment time bomb for the next Trump presidency if he tries to stop funding the war in Ukraine. We must vote against this disastrous bill,” Sen. Vance wrote.

And 18 Republican RINOs supported this package!

Senator Vance sent the following memo to every Republican lawmaker in Congress:

The Ukraine Supplemental Includes a Hidden Impeachment Clause Against President Trump

Background: President Trump was wrongfully impeached by the partisan Pelosi-led House of Representatives on December 18, 2019! At the core of the impeachment was a pause on funds appropriated to Ukraine: “…$391 million in security assistance: $250 million through the Department of Defense’s (DOD) Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative and $141 million through the State Department’s Foreign Military Financing program.

The false argument put forward by Democrats was/is as follows: as President Trump had allegedly paused these funds because he wished to see the corrupt nexus between the Biden family and Ukraine investigated, President Trump had abused his power, with the aim of interfering with the U.S. presidential election.

Page 425 of the Committee Report on the first impeachment states: “The President froze military assistance to Ukraine against U.S. national security interests and over the objections of career experts.” The impeachment inquiry report states, “The President did so despite the longstanding bipartisan support of Congress, uniform support across federal departments and agencies for the provision to Ukraine of the military assistance, and his obligations under the Impoundment Control Act.”

The Supplemental Impeachment Time Bomb: President Trump has said, in regard to the war in Ukraine, “We got to get that war settled and I’ll get it settled.” He has stated that he would resolve the war in 24 hours.”

The bill includes $1.6 billion for foreign military financing in Ukraine, and $13.7 billion for the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative. These funds expire on September 30, 2025 nearly a year into the possible second term of President Trump. These are the exact same accounts President Trump was impeached for pausing in December 2019. Every single House Republican voted against this impeachment resolution.

If President Trump were to withdraw from or pause financial support for the war in Ukraine in order to bring the conflict to a peaceful conclusion, “over the objections of career experts,” it would amount to the same fake violation of budget law from the first impeachment, under markedly similar facts and circumstances.

Partisan Democrats would seize on the opportunity to impeach him once again. The Washington Post has reported that tying President Trump’s hands on foreign policy is very much top of mind for Biden administration officials, who are openly boasting about their plans.’ The background quote is damning:

Not incidentally, a U.S. official said, the hope is that the long-term promise — again assuming congressional buy-in — will also “future-proof” aid for Ukraine against the possibility that former president Donald Trump wins his reelection bid.?

Conclusion: The supplemental represents an attempt by the foreign policy blob/deep state to stop President Trump from pursuing his desired policy, and if he does so anyways, to provide grounds to impeach him and undermine his administration. All Republicans should oppose its passage.

According to Senator Vance, “This new Ukraine bill tries to make it ILLEGAL for Trump to do what he is promising on the campaign trail. It is a plot against the President Trump, plain and simple.”

But, of course, they have an insurance plan even if Trump pulls it off. Though few have noticed, buried in the bill’s text is a kill switch for the next Trump presidency.

The legislation explicitly requires funding for Ukraine well into the next presidential term. The Washington Post has already reported this provision was added to control Donald Trump.

It gets worse. Back in 2019, Democrats articulated a novel theory of impeachment, based on Trump’s refusal to spend money from the USAI Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative. Five years after impeaching Trump for refusing to spend money on Ukraine, they have drafted a new law that again requires Trump to spend money on Ukraine. If he negotiates an end to the war, as he has promised to do, they will undoubtedly argue that he has broken the law. We are nearly a year away from an election that could give Trump the presidency, and Ukraine-obsessive Republicans have already given the Democrats a predicate to impeach him.

Slava Ukraini, America be damned.

Just when you thought

This new Ukraine bill tries to make it ILLEGAL for Trump to do what he is promising on the campaign trail.

It is a plot against the President Trump, plain and simple. pic.twitter.com/DC1ffzevji

— J.D. Vance (@JDVance1) February 12, 2024

Senator Vance added, “Politically, they will make it harder for Trump to get elected. This is the first part of the plot.”

This is not a one-off thing. Every time their Ukraine-first plan hits a road bump, they will blame Trump and “MAGA Republicans.”

They will create a narrative of chaos and extremism to undermine the nominee of their party.

Politically, they will make it harder for Trump to get… pic.twitter.com/IHSJ3a9zYD

— J.D. Vance (@JDVance1) February 12, 2024

Rep. Matt Gaetz agreed with Senator Vance – “This bill is an impeachment trap!”

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene also wrote, “DEAD ON ARRIVAL IN THE HOUSE!!!”

— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (@RepMTG) February 12, 2024

Senator Rand Paul wrote, “Republicans need to be aware that this bill, supported by Mitch McConnell and almost all of Senate GOP leadership, sets in motion the next hyper-partisan Trump impeachment (before he’s even elected!)”

Who do these people represent? It certainly is not their MAGA voting base!


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fakegaykaren; hoftobsessedkaren; rinos; senate; sodomizedkaren; sodomyobsessedkaren; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2024 10:15:17 AM PST by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Come on Jim. That idea is DOA. One Congress cannot bind another.


2 posted on 02/12/2024 10:18:08 AM PST by Mouton (150MTs in the right location will not solve our problems now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

There is SOMETHING behind this Ukraine business that we don’t know about.
From the 2019 impeachment, to the Vindman brothers, to a provision that the next president couldn’t pull us out of NATO, to all the politicians taking pictures with the Olive God Zelensky, to the flag pins, to the flag draped across the dais in the House chamber, to the hair-on-fire reactions to some funding being eliminated. Now an impeachment trigger to FUNDING.

Nothing is this important.

But SOMETHING is REALLY important to the Ruling Oligarchy.

Something that we can’t know about, but we just have to keep paying for. And it happened during the Obama years. Something’s definitely up.


3 posted on 02/12/2024 10:18:30 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

That’s notable extra-constitutional...


4 posted on 02/12/2024 10:18:52 AM PST by Blueflag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

“Includes language for automatic impeachment”

No such thing.

Another absurd rant from Hoft.


5 posted on 02/12/2024 10:19:31 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

I don’t think the Constitution allows a Senate to remove a President in advance, let alone take away the job of impeachment from the House. Just imagine if it did.


6 posted on 02/12/2024 10:20:05 AM PST by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Can you guarantee it is DOA?


7 posted on 02/12/2024 10:21:16 AM PST by bray (You can tell who the Commies fear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Bannon is reporting the same thing.


8 posted on 02/12/2024 10:22:24 AM PST by bray (You can tell who the Commies fear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
The legislation explicitly requires funding for Ukraine well into the next presidential term. The Washington Post has already reported this provision was added to control Donald Trump.

One congress cannot constrain future congresses.

9 posted on 02/12/2024 10:23:51 AM PST by MortMan (Corduroy pillows are making headlines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
Partisan Democrats would seize on the opportunity to impeach him once again. The Washington Post has reported that tying President Trump’s hands on foreign policy is very much top of mind for Biden administration officials, who are openly boasting about their plans.’ The background quote is damning

This doesn't look like a "Partisan Democrats" problem - this bill had very significant Republican support.

10 posted on 02/12/2024 10:24:45 AM PST by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
An absurd rant? The whole piece references JD Vance and memo he put out this legislation..

So, you want us to believe you know more about this legislation than Vance?

11 posted on 02/12/2024 10:24:52 AM PST by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

This isn’t real and I am shocked Vance would say this. It makes me doubt his honesty.

The Democrats TRIED to use this narrative to convict him during his impeachment. They were unsuccessful. They can TRY again next time but unless the Republicans want to get rid of Trump, they will be unsuccessful again.


12 posted on 02/12/2024 10:25:26 AM PST by nitzy (I wonder if the telescreens in 1984 were first called "free Obamascreens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Doesn’t that bill have to go back to congress for reconciliation? Congress must kill it.


13 posted on 02/12/2024 10:25:58 AM PST by blackdog ((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Ownership of Ukraine’s and Russia’s mineral wealth by the oligarchs. Ownership of the world

Of course, they will not tell you this.


14 posted on 02/12/2024 10:26:04 AM PST by Jonty30 (In a nuclear holocaust, there is always a point in time where the meat is cooked to perfection. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Todd young is an embarrassment to the state of Indiana. No doubt they have Epstein type dirt against him.


15 posted on 02/12/2024 10:26:29 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
It's "impeachment" when Republicans do it; it's a "policy dispute" when Democrats do it.

-PJ

16 posted on 02/12/2024 10:27:07 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
Mitch McConnell and Senate REPUBLICANS Help Pass Ukraine Funding Package that Includes Language for Automatic Impeachment if Trump Terminates Funding for Ukraine War!
17 posted on 02/12/2024 10:27:08 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
That idea is DOA. One Congress cannot bind another.

Who knows if the courts would ultimately see it that way.

That isn't the point. The point is 18 Republicans are trying to saddle Trump with funding he wouldn't agree to. And, that is unacceptable and outrageous.

18 posted on 02/12/2024 10:27:20 AM PST by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

It’s all fake


19 posted on 02/12/2024 10:27:50 AM PST by Fledermaus (Is it me, or all of a sudden have the buried trolls come out on FR like cicadas? It's all noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nitzy

So Vance is lying?


20 posted on 02/12/2024 10:28:15 AM PST by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson