Posted on 02/08/2024 6:55:13 AM PST by CFW
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Thursday morning on whether former President Trump is eligible to be on the 2024 presidential ballot. Listen Live
(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...
I think your “real possibility” isn’t quite that real.
Yes, the establishment, globalist cabal HATES Trump. Fine. But any credible attempt on Trump and...
...how did Roger Waters phrase it...?
“The rusty wire that holds the cork that keeps the anger in gives way, and — suddenly...”
I kinda think a broad majority of folks have had a bellyful of it, and there’d be a cataclysm in this country that’d make the 2020 Summer of St. Floyd look like a Sunday School weenie roast, and the Deep Staters all know that’s a losing scenario for them.
I think iF anybody needs to be watching their back in this present hour it’s Tucker Carlson. I hear the Deep State has the long knives out for him.
Greg Price
@greg_price11
·
30m
This is just a bloodbath.
Justice Gorsuch spends two minutes slapping around Colorado’s lawyer.
You almost gotta feel bad for the guy.
Who is asking now? She is suggesting the political aspects in this who thing.
btt
Was there ever any doubt?
They are all asking good questions. I keep getting interrupted listening, but this is a really good hearing. I’ll probably listen again when I can do so uninterrupted.
Since the one person thing had been in place for years, I guess we were doomed from the beginning. Of course many of those one person decisions have been appealed. Some have won. Others were let stand.
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
Stevenson represents CO Sec of State.
I lowkey love that Thomas is the first to ask questions of all participants. This is driving the Left NUTS.
Thomas wants Stevenson to explain how Sec 3 represents a qualification for president. She says its disqualifying.
She is pushed to defend a state removing a presidential candidate based on however state officials interpret sections of the Constitution. Stevenson insists Sec 3 is as much a qualification for president as age and birthplace.
Yes, but it \specifically\ excludes the ELECTORS that engaged in insurrection.
Trump’s \electors\ in the State must have participated in and been convicted of ‘insurrection’ to be rejected by the Congressional confirmation process.
Still not directly involving Trump.
We will know for sure if SCOTUS is compromised
Trump’s attorney was calm, professional, engaging, prepared!
Colorado’s attorney ‘lost it’…..he sounded like a scared kid
Would a DeSantis candidacy, run differently, have changed your predicted outcome of Trump vs Biden?
Or are you predicting Biden (or whomever they swap in at last second) was always going to win this year?
I’m not able to listen now, but I’m following it on Twitter.
Well, not legislation, per se.
It requires and -act- of Congress, namely the confirmation process (Jan 6).
Legislation, in its proper sense can be vetoed by the sitting POTUS.
Why hasn’t Trump’s attorney brought up the fact that Trump was tried in the Senate for insurrection and found not guilty?😟
It will be 9-0 here but they are leaving open the question of whether Congress can refuse to seat Trump on the issu of insurrection.
Absolutely no surprise there. Marxist Democrats have known that all along. They’ve been campaigning for Trump because he’s the best GOTV and fundraising tool they’ve got.
Some of us can’t listen right now because we are working.
Any protest -- down to the tiniest -- would be Tiananmen Squared. The same police forces that facilitated the Summer of Floyd would stomp their jack books down on your neck.
RDS is a loser. I’m writing in Trump. Now run off and GFY
MizDonna
@donwill94062871
·
10m
The CO lawyer gives the game away. And reminds us why we HAVE to hold the House.
KJB asks what happens if we rule against you?
He said it is up to Congress to NOT count the Electoral votes.
Wait a minute! Isn’t that what the “insurrection” was all about? And the left said Congress HAD to count the votes. But, she is right. We HAVE to keep the House.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.