Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I believe this is 'warranted' after my experiences with NCO's who were better than some officers.
1 posted on 02/08/2024 6:55:11 AM PST by Loud Mime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Loud Mime

Other services still have Warrant Officers.

They are usually in command of technical groups.

Some are even Helicopter pilots...................


2 posted on 02/08/2024 6:59:33 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal qs are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

I believe this doesn’t address the root failure of being anti white.
I’m a USAF veteran. The current USAF, and military in general, is a f’ing clown show. White men can’t be replaced.

https://www.palladiummag.com/2023/06/01/complex-systems-wont-survive-the-competence-crisis/


3 posted on 02/08/2024 7:00:39 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

I worked with one WO in the AF weather service. But I don’t remember in 1962 what his background was before becoming a forecaster. NCO forecasters trained me after my university courses.
Larry


4 posted on 02/08/2024 7:01:19 AM PST by larryjohnson (FReepersonaltrainer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

I remember as an NCO in 69, I was offered a chance to be an Army WO. Almost jumped on it until I figured out what they were gonna be used for.


5 posted on 02/08/2024 7:04:41 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

Good move. They were good for the Army, as I remember.


6 posted on 02/08/2024 7:05:25 AM PST by Ciexyz (Prayers for America and Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

Good move. They were good for the Army, as I remember.


7 posted on 02/08/2024 7:05:25 AM PST by Ciexyz (Prayers for America and Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

I served with a couple of the remaining CWO’s while in the USAF. We called them “unicorns”.


12 posted on 02/08/2024 7:13:00 AM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

To retain technical know-how and leadership capabilities, the services created the E8 and E9 ranks. The real problem is that law says an officer must have a college degree. Perhaps that should simply be removed as a barrier for qualified leaders and technical members.


13 posted on 02/08/2024 7:13:38 AM PST by CodeToad (Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

Navy has both Warrants and LDOs (Limited Duty Officers)...I never really saw the need for both as they often seemed to overlap in their activities....at least my experience.


14 posted on 02/08/2024 7:14:02 AM PST by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

The people v. their masters.


19 posted on 02/08/2024 7:23:26 AM PST by nagant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime
If the USAF had a WO program I would have stayed on active duty. I was good at my job but had no where to go technically and they kept on pushing more administrative work in my direction as I got promoted. After 9 years I went into the reserves, got a commission and went for another 16 years.

On active duty I was in a critical AFSC and they wouldn't give me an OTS start date. In the reserves, I walked right into one in the first 30 days. IMO that pathway could have been a WO position.

20 posted on 02/08/2024 7:30:37 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

I always saw the Army Warrant officers as being like a big apartment complex maintenance man.

No one is sure of what exactly they do all day but as long as things run smooth they are left alone and are a little outside of the system.


21 posted on 02/08/2024 7:43:04 AM PST by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

I’m a soon to be retired Army Aviator and Chief Warrant Officer Four. Every 5-10 years, the Air Force brings this up, then decides against it.

The problem lies in the pay difference between O grades and Warrants. The Army can offer Warrant Officer appointments to well-qualified technical expert NCOs, and it works. The Army also allows you to go straight from High School to basic to Warrant Officer Flight Training as a Warrant Officer. No other branch has the “high school to flight school” or “street to seat” option for Aviation. That’s where Warrant Officers come in.

The Navy did a limited trial run of Warrant Officers for rotary wing Aviators, but it was cancelled after only a year or so. This was back in 2007ish.

Time will tell if the Air Force will actually go through with it this time.


25 posted on 02/08/2024 7:48:28 AM PST by Nathan _in_Arkansas (Hoist the black flag and begin slitting throats. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

If the future of the AF is going to include lots of drones, wouldn’t WOs be handy for a lot of the work?


26 posted on 02/08/2024 7:49:21 AM PST by hanamizu ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

Outside of cost, reopening the rank is not a real improvement. According to military.com:

“It does not appear, per the document, that the new warrant officer program would be producing pilots.”

If that’s the case, then flooding the UMD’s with those ranks will be a problem for continuity as the warrant will not be able to fall back into the specialty program not related to the NCO force. And how many will be used for administration slots that could be filled by captain down and in some master up may be an overuse of the rank. If they have space, use the rank structure and promote to fill the slots rather than put it on hold by filling it with overqualified warrants from the outside. This would also assist retention losses with a chance at promotion, more bases selections, and more use of extended in place leadership troops adding experience to the mix.

wy69


29 posted on 02/08/2024 7:55:25 AM PST by whitney69 (yption tunnels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

The Air Force, in my opinion, being NOW under the control and manipulation of marxist anti-patriots, is doing nothing more than steering pay raises to so called “people of color”.


30 posted on 02/08/2024 8:04:20 AM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime
Black Swan event.

I saw one of the last two in 1976 in the Comm Group building at McClellan AFB.   I couldn't even process what I was seeing and didn't salute.

34 posted on 02/08/2024 8:52:18 AM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

We were at Griffiss AFB when they did away with warrant officers. My dad, an O-4 fighter pilot at the time, said it was a mistake. I think he was right - the Army’s chopper pilots are WOs, and I think pilots in the AF should have the opportunity to stay in the cockpit if they don’t want to be on the command track. The only way to do that fairly is to make them WOs.

Colonel, USAF JAGC (Ret)


35 posted on 02/08/2024 9:01:00 AM PST by jagusafr ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

This might be a good career option for my 18 y/o grandson. He wants to elist in the AF, but is more interested in a technical path.


41 posted on 02/08/2024 9:23:01 AM PST by COBOL2Java ("Life without liberty is like a body without spirit." - Kahlil Gibran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loud Mime

The military took a look at the millennials and gen z and said no freakin’ way.


42 posted on 02/08/2024 9:25:40 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson