Posted on 01/31/2024 9:56:38 PM PST by SeekAndFind
The world’s richest man had a bad day in court this week. A judge in Delaware ruled that Elon Musk is ineligible to receive a compensation package from Tesla worth an estimated $55 billion. This is a case that has dragged out for five years and the merits of the arguments coming from both sides seem rather vague. The suit was originally brought by a group of shareholders who claim that Musk unfairly crafted his own compensation package resulting in “unjust enrichment” for the billionaire at the expense of the other shareholders. The judge apparently agreed, but Musk’s attorneys argue that the package was a fair one and they have all the receipts to prove it. (Associated Press)
A judge says Elon Musk must give up a compensation package awarded by Tesla’s board of directors that is potentially worth more than $55 billion.
The ruling in a Delaware court comes five years after a shareholder lawsuit targeted Tesla CEO Musk and the directors. They were accused of breaching their duties to the electric vehicle and solar panel manufacturer, resulting in a waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment for Musk.
Plaintiff’s lawyers argued that the pay package was dictated by Musk and was the product of sham negotiations with directors who were not independent of him.
The compensation plan itself doesn’t appear to be the major sticking point in this case. It was filled with aggressive growth and performance milestones for Tesla to meet, with various levels of compensation going to Musk if they met them. Nearly all of the milestones wound up being met, so Musk appears to have held up his end of the deal. The plaintiffs are instead arguing that the deal was arrived at unfairly because Musk was running the show in the background.
Tesla soared under Musk’s ownership, outpacing the projections of most Wall Street analysts. Musk’s incentive package called for Tesla to grow to a valuation of at least $650 billion. It actually reached $800 billion and briefly went over a trillion earlier this year. Musk’s attorneys argue that all of the shareholders similarly benefitted from the company’s stellar growth, seeing growth in their own portfolios and additional payments.
But the underlying question is whether or not the board developed the compensation package independently or if Musk held too much influence over them in determining how much he would eventually receive. The plaintiffs claim that was the case, but whatever influence Musk had must have been indirect at best. The judge claims that Elon had a “long personal and business relationship” with committee chairman Ira Ehrenpreis. Another member of the committee had been Musk’s divorce lawyer. So he knew them, but none of them actually worked for or reported to him.
It makes perfect sense that Elon Musk would have wanted to work out the best possible deal for himself that he could. He’s a capitalist, after all. But in the end, none of them were forced to agree to the deal. Musk only owned 13% of the shares of Tesla at the time, so he couldn’t override the other shareholders either. This sounds like a case of people believing that Musk had made “too much money” and they wanted a bigger slice of the pie. At one point they even refer to Musk’s “absurdly outsized pay package.”
But Tesla made an absurd amount of money. What else did they expect would happen? And none of this addresses the idea that the courts can simply reach into the past and dip into the pockets of private entrepreneurs and relieve them of their wealth. The whole situation seems absurd.
Elon has enough Chinese money backing him that he now has the political control to do what he wants.
But you are not a stockholder.
There is great hate for Elon Musk by the unequal’s who covet his genius. You lack the basic ability to comprehend what Musk has created.
Barring a corporate move to Texas, Musk is a resident of Texas. He likely could sue Tesla for breach of contract and reach a quick settlement of $55B. Stick that up the Delaware judge’s keester.
EC
If I was a Tesla stockholder I’d be infuriated about Musk’s inside deal to use the company as his own cash cow and using his inside circle of cronies to ‘negotiate’ that.
The stockholders over that time benefitted far more collectively than $55 Billion. Many multiples of that amount.
Bump
Where?
Texas has a gold depository. But Elon Musk is the type of man who wants wealth to be productive.
Gold is a hedge against destruction, but it does not grow. It prevents total loss of assets due to inflationary monetary stem. But you cannot eat gold.
Legal Plunder.
Bastiat
Lenin would be proud of you, comrade.
If Elon Musk hadn't created Tesla and have it become the EV giant it is, and there wouldn't be a dime to argue about.
Do you own any stock in any company?
If you do, you must know that the CEO and the janitor are not compensated using the same methods.
Without Musk, there is no Tesla, no billions to argue about, no judges to preside over no profits.
And to call Musk "one stockholder" is like calling Tiger Woods, "one golfer".
The rights of the stockholders are nonexistent if there is no Tesla, but since there was a Tesla, Musk's agreements for compensation were a part of the original formation, and the stockholder agreed to them when he freely purchased to stock.
The judge, like you, is a communist.
It was a joke. Mr. Drysdale was the banker in Beverly Hillbillies who’d do anything to get and keep money in his bank.
Yes. I am old enough to remember him.
Take a closer look into that money speech link. It addresses that .
02/14/2024
SpaceX has moved its state of incorporation from Delaware to Texas!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4217438/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.