Posted on 01/25/2024 9:34:23 AM PST by Heartlander
In a 1962 episode of Rod Serling’s The Twilight Zone, an alien race lands on Earth, promising to solve the problems of hunger, energy shortages, and war. In return, these aliens ask only to be trusted.
A book an alien leaves behind is analyzed by decoders, who translate the title as “To Serve Man.” An alien ambassador then passes a lie detector test, consequently resolving the hunger and energy crisis. Nations lay down their arms, placing their trust in the aliens. The aliens then invite humans to visit their home planet, and the first group sends back reports of paradise-like conditions. Millions sign up to visit, but as the leader of the decoding group is entering the spaceship, an assistant rushes up and yells, “It’s a cookbook!”
In our real-life drama today, the United Nations, wealthy globalists, the World Economic Forum (WEF), Big Tech oligarchs, and unctuous politicians tell us that man-caused CO2 emissions are effecting widespread “climate change.” They ask us to trust that their prescriptions to eliminate fossil fuels, gasoline-powered transportation, agriculture, and cattle farming will “save the planet.”
Intensive research, though, shows that true science offers no support for these claims about human CO2 emissions. Yet almost every human institution on Earth has trusted the globalists’ promises, and CO2—perhaps the second most important element to human life, behind oxygen—is now mercilessly vilified. According to climate change advocates, CO2 is a toxic pollutant that must be drastically reduced, even though life flourished in the past when CO2 levels were much higher.
Overall, climate change activists’ arguments are difficult to support. Commercial greenhouses pipe in elevated levels of CO2 to increase plant growth. On a global scale, the same phenomenon is happening: The increase of global CO2 over the past decades has resulted in a greening of the Earth. How could this life-sustaining element be an instrument of death (as the globalists claim)?
Research reveals that the real motivation of groups like the U.N. and the WEF is power to achieve their true goal, expressed by the 1972 book The Limits to Growth. This goal is to decrease the world’s population to around one billion people.
Their 1991 follow-up book, The First Global Revolution, brazenly revealed that they had (at the least) overemphasized the problem of global warming as a means to get support for that global government. The U.N.’s proposed world improvement plan, Agenda 2030, is the blueprint to achieve that goal.
Still, why highlight CO2 as the main issue? After all, CO2 increases photosynthesis and crop yields, and it’s less than 1 percent of the Earth’s atmosphere (excluding water vapor). We know that increasing CO2 levels from the 1750 level of 280 ppm to 800 ppm (double the current level) would increase crop production by a minimum of about 70 to 80 percent. That’s a good thing, right? So why would globalists want to drastically reduce CO2?
And that’s when I had my “It’s a cookbook!” moment. CO2 increases food growth, which keeps people from starving. But that, in fact, is the opposite of what globalists want. Based on their declared objectives, they want to decrease the Earth’s population by over seven billion people, and—other than war and manufactured pandemics—starvation is the most reliable method. Consequently, they’ve used pseudo-science and the unquestioning media to redefine CO2 as an environmental poison. They’ve “cancelled” CO2 not to save the planet but because it threatens their de-population plans.
Their most recent scare-mongering has been about impending food shortages, but they’ve been actively working toward that for decades. Bill Gates and other billionaires have been buying up U.S. farmland; the climate czars are restricting fertilizers that help feed the world’s population; others are eliminating cattle, thus removing a major source of protein from the human diet.
As implementation of Agenda 2030 continues, we should expect to hear more and more about food shortages. But that’s the planned, deliberate “crisis” that Agenda 2030 will bring about, pushing hungry people to accept global control. “Cancelling” CO2 is part of that agenda.
While the U.N.’s Agenda 2030 is not a fictional “cookbook,” its call for Net Zero, decarbonization, and eliminating CO2 is a recipe … for global dictatorship and the mass starvation of humans. Welcome to the Twilight Zone.
more Co2 is good because it helps plants grow, which in turn means more oxygen for everyone
man doesn’t need to save the earth, the earth will go on.
man needs to save man... from man. globalists want us dead or subservient.
There is no such thing as Net “0”. It’s on paper only. And 0.04% is nothing but an estimate.
I’ve been saying right along that it should increase as the population increases since we need more food and plant life and it balances co2 vs oxygen....like you’re saying.
God told man to be fruitful and multiply, to fill the earth. What does He know?
Then we entered a moderate warming trend which is likely to reverse itself at some point fairly soon, except that the record keepers are now almost all on the payroll of those pushing this nonsense. So, it will have to get pretty bad before it gets noticed.
The one thing that is certain is that if you look beyond the last 50 years there is not a close relationship between CO2 levels and the temperature of the earth. This has been confirmed repeatedly by geologists studying ice cores from Greenland. We had much higher levels of CO2 in the atmosphere during previous ice ages.
I would, further, consider it a PLUS if less fresh water were locked in the polar ice caps.
There seems to be plenty of evidence that the Earth was more lush and full of life in its distant past.
Dihydrogen monoxide is colorless, odorless, tasteless, and kills uncounted thousands of people every year. Most of these deaths are caused by accidental inhalation of DHMO, but the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide do not end there. Prolonged exposure to its solid form causes severe tissue damage. Symptoms of DHMO ingestion can include excessive sweating and urination, and possibly a bloated feeling, nausea, vomiting and body electrolyte imbalance. For those who have become dependent, DHMO withdrawal means certain death.
Dihydrogen monoxide:
Contamination Is Reaching Epidemic Proportions!
Quantities of dihydrogen monoxide have been found in almost every stream, lake, and reservoir in America today. But the pollution is global, and the contaminant has even been found in Antarctic ice. DHMO has caused millions of dollars of property damage in the midwest, and recently California.
Despite the danger, dihydrogen monoxide is often used:
The Horror Must Be Stopped!
The American government has refused to ban the production, distribution, or use of this damaging chemical due to its "importance to the economic health of this nation." In fact, the navy and other military organizations are conducting experiments with DHMO, and designing multi-billion dollar devices to control and utilize it during warfare situations. Hundreds of military research facilities receive tons of it through a highly sophisticated underground distribution network. Many store large quantities for later use. - http://www.csun.edu/science/ref/humor/dhmo.html
Pranksters have gotten college students to sign petitions calling for the elimination of CO2 from the atmosphere. We were taught all the way through school about the photosyntesis process. I guess kids are too busy with Gender Studies and Ethnic Diversity classes these days to worry about basic science.
If we really had a CO2 problem, we’d be up to our ears in weeds!
Bookmark.
IIRC, the Alien is also the same guy who played “Jaws” in the 70s James Bond movies ...
And to think, in 1980 they wanted more CO2 to counter THE COMING ICE AGE!
From POPULAR SCIENCE, Feb 1980..
PS/What’s News ....
page 73
Changing the weather intentionally or otherwise weather modification..(Earth cooling vs Greenhouse effect)
“Do you suppose we can learn enough, soon enough, to pull off a balancing act with the CO2 blanket saving us from another ice age?”
***
AND WE DID IT! Now CO2 is suddenly a problem!
Pranksters have even gotten college students to sign petitions to do away with Dihydrogen monoxide!
I do not doubt this a bit. I was watching some stupid nature show while waiting for a Dr. appointment a month or so ago. Towards the end of the show, of course it turned to “climate catastrophe” garbage and all the scientists were asked what is the solution? They all said that the earths population is too big and we need to reduce it, a couple of them said that 1 billion is the “sustainable” level. What a bunch of commie a-holes.
There is a reason greenland was not called snowland
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.