Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Armor Experts Breakdown Video Of Ukrainian M2 Bradley Mauling Russian T-90M Tank
The Warzone ^ | 1/18/2024 | HOWARD ALTMAN

Posted on 01/20/2024 5:19:44 PM PST by VAFreedom

A new viral video shows the crew of a Russian T-90M Breakthrough tank getting a first-hand lesson in the devastating firepower of the Bradley Fighting Vehicle’s Bushmaster M242 25mm automatic cannon. The War Zone reached out to highly-experienced armor experts to explain exactly what we are seeing in the intense combat footage and how the Bradley was able to take on Russia's most capable frontline tank.

(Excerpt) Read more at thedrive.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Russia; Ukraine; War
KEYWORDS: bradley; russia; ruzzia; t90m; tanks; ukraine; ussr
Just saw this, is this a fair fight? it must've been very unlucky for T-90M to be pelted by that cannon.

I wonder how M1 Abrams would stand up?

1 posted on 01/20/2024 5:19:44 PM PST by VAFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom
>>is this a fair fight?

**If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.

2 posted on 01/20/2024 5:32:22 PM PST by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom

Reports say that the Bradleys are very effective, even more than the big tanks


3 posted on 01/20/2024 5:40:12 PM PST by canuck_conservative (NATO - now celebrating 75 successful years of keeping the Russian vermin out!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith

“ If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.”
*********************************

Fo’ sure!


4 posted on 01/20/2024 5:46:28 PM PST by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA. -PRO-MAX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith

No such thing as a fair fight.


5 posted on 01/20/2024 5:52:53 PM PST by grcuster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom

I reviewed the footage. It looks like the tank got too close to the Bradley. The tank has an armor and gun size advantage. But at close range the Bradley’s 25mm auto cannon give it a huge rate of fire advantage. Close in that cannon is going to shred anything but frontal armor.

During the Battle of the Bulge in WWII, an U.S. M8 armored car killed a German Panzer VI Tiger tank by hiding, let the tank pass, then driving like hell to put 37mm rounds in the Tiger’s rear before they could slew the 88mm in the turret around to obliterate the paper thin armor on the M8.


6 posted on 01/20/2024 6:27:12 PM PST by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom

How the heck does a Bradley flank a T-90? Where was the supporting infantry?


7 posted on 01/20/2024 6:43:30 PM PST by GreenLanternCorps (Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Ask about franchise opportunities in your area.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drop 50 and fire for effect
Close in that cannon is going to shred anything but frontal armor.

Agreed. If the tank is buttoned up, the 25mm rounds may tear up the vision blocks so the driver cannot see to drive. And he isn't going to stick his head out to see. Same is true for the commander's vision blocks. And he isn't likely to stick his head out to see either. The gunner's optics can also be wrecked by a single lucky hit, and those rounds can also badly damage the track links. Blind the beast and immobilize it and it is nearly helpless. Then back up until you can fire a TOW2B at it and you have a very dead tank.

8 posted on 01/20/2024 6:59:28 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom

I guess the joke in on the “Pentagon Wars”


9 posted on 01/20/2024 7:43:17 PM PST by Theophilus (It's far easier to rig a jury than an election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenLanternCorps
How the heck does a Bradley flank a T-90? Where was the supporting infantry?

There was none.

VIDEO: US-supplied Bradleys destroy Russian T90 tank

10 posted on 01/20/2024 7:44:02 PM PST by Timber Rattler ("To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." --George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom

There was another Bradley nearby, but only one is seen in action in the video. Another guy has a video about this on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tklWv9_D6-Y&t=330s


11 posted on 01/20/2024 7:49:39 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenLanternCorps
”How the heck does a Bradley flank a T-90? Where was the supporting infantry?”

Combined arms are for sissies.

12 posted on 01/20/2024 7:56:51 PM PST by Flag_This (They're lying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin
When I was stationed at Ft. Hood during the mid-1980's the then-new Bradley was undergoing final tests. During it's big demonstration for the visiting muckety-mucks (who control the bucks) they had several Bradleys electronically linked to fire on one target simultaneously, reducing it AND the hilltop it was on to vapor.

I don't know if that was a one-off trick to guarantee funding or a standard capability - but that blew everyone's socks off. So cool to see it still kicking ass 40 years later.

13 posted on 01/20/2024 9:43:08 PM PST by MikelTackNailer (I'll settle for Make America GOOD Again. The usurping regime has made us the world's villain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Theophilus
I guess the joke in on the “Pentagon Wars”

Very much so, and has been since the Battle of 73 Easting.

14 posted on 01/20/2024 9:55:46 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GreenLanternCorps

“Where was the supporting infantry?”

‘Supporting infantry’ has never been a Soviet/Russian tactic.


15 posted on 01/20/2024 10:53:05 PM PST by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom

Bradleys have taken out more tanks than Abrams.


16 posted on 01/21/2024 6:07:50 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

That particular Bradley does not have TOW mounts


17 posted on 01/21/2024 6:09:58 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PIF

The video I saw was not very clear. If they lack TOW launchers , then they need some serious suprise to be able to cripple the tank.


18 posted on 01/21/2024 7:19:51 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
Actually, the Soviets used tank riding infantry a lot during World War II, which is why this is surprising.


19 posted on 01/21/2024 2:03:48 PM PST by GreenLanternCorps (Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Ask about franchise opportunities in your area.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson