Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas blocks federal border agents from processing migrants in Eagle Pass public park
CBS News ^ | January 12, 2024 / 11:23 AM EST | Camilo Montoya-Galvez

Posted on 01/12/2024 9:42:32 AM PST by Red Badger

Washington — Texas state officials this week abruptly blocked federal U.S. Border Patrol agents from entering and patrolling a public area in the border town of Eagle Pass where they typically first encounter migrants who cross the Rio Grande illegally, two U.S. officials told CBS News on Thursday.

After seizing control of Shelby Park in Eagle Pass, Texas National Guard units deployed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott have prevented Border Patrol agents from entering the area, the federal officials said. Border Patrol has used the park in recent weeks to hold migrants in an outdoor staging area before they are transported for further processing, including last month, when illegal crossings soared to record levels.

Earlier Thursday, Texas state officials prevented Border Patrol boats from patrolling that area, one of the officials added, requesting anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the press.

"They are denying entry to Border Patrol agents to conduct our duties," the official said, noting they are not sure "what authority (Texas officials) have over the federal government."

In a filing early Friday with the Supreme Court, the Justice Department described the extraordinary standoff between Texas and the federal government. Citing testimony from local officials and photos, the Justice Department said Texas was using armed Guardsmen and vehicles to deny Border Patrol agents and federal National Guard soldiers access to roughly 2.5 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border.

"Texas's new actions," the Justice Department said, "demonstrate an escalation of the State's measures to block Border Patrol's ability to patrol or even to surveil the border and be in a position to respond to emergencies."

Under federal law, Border Patrol has a legal responsibility to process migrants on U.S. soil and determine whether to detain them, transfer them to another agency, deport them or release them into the country, pending a court hearing. The international boundary between the U.S. and Mexico is located in the middle of the Rio Grande in Texas.

Eagle Pass Mayor Rolando Salinas said the small city, which administers Shelby Park, did not give Texas state officials permission to take over the area. "This is not something that we wanted," Salinas said Thursday. "This is not something that we asked for as a city."

Michael Perry, a spokesperson for the Texas Military Department, which oversees the state National Guard, said the actions taken by the state were designed to prevent illegal crossings by migrants.

"The Texas National Guard has maintained a presence with security points and temporary barrier in Shelby Park since 2021," Perry said in a statement. "The current posture is to prepare for future illegal immigrant surges and to restrict access to organizations that perpetuate illegal immigrant crossings in the park and greater Eagle Pass area."

In a statement Friday regarding the events in Eagle Pass, White House spokesperson Angelo Fernández Hernández said Texas was seeking to "politicize the border."

"Governor Abbott continues his extreme political stunts that not only seek to demonize and dehumanize people, but that also make it harder and more dangerous for Border Patrol to do their jobs," Fernández Hernández said.

The seizure of Shelby Park is the latest and most brazen effort by Texas state officials to challenge the federal government's authority on immigration. Under Abbott's leadership, Texas has bused tens of thousands of migrants to Democratic-led cities, arrested thousands of migrant adults on trespassing charges and fortified the banks of the Rio Grande with razor wire and floating barriers.

Last month, Abbott signed a law known as SB4 that would allow Texas law enforcement officials to arrest, jail and prosecute migrants on state criminal charges of entering the country illegally. The law, which criminalizes an action already illegal at the federal level, is being challenged in federal court by the Justice Department and civil rights groups. It is set to take effect in March.

In an affidavit attached to the Supreme Court filing, Robert Danley, a top Customs and Border Protection official in Eagle Pass, said Texas' actions were preventing his agents from patrolling the Rio Grande and processing migrants, including those who may be in distress. The park's seizure by the state, Danley said, has also reduced Border Patrol's surveillance capability in that area by 90% and created safety risks for both migrants and agents.

Now, Border Patrol is being forced to process migrants near a busy highway, Danley added.

"Without access to the staging area, mobile intake and loading onto transportation must occur on the shoulder along Loop 480, a busy two-lane highway most frequently used by commercial traffic traveling at a high speed," Danley wrote. "Because of the lack of physical space, there is an increased risk to both migrants and agents of traffic-related injury."

When he asked Texas officials to explain their actions, Danley said he was "advised that Texas does not want Border Patrol to be able to arrest, process, or transport migrants out of the identified area."

Nicole Sganga contributed reporting.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Mexico; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: shelbypark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: jimjohn

>Didn’t you catch #46’s last speech?<

Oh? Did he croak?....................😜


21 posted on 01/12/2024 10:16:33 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem
More likely Biden will call for 75,000 volunteers to invade Texas and put a boot on the throat of any pro-American citizen.

I can see this and you know it's part of their contigency plan. They would frame it as a conspiracy theory.

22 posted on 01/12/2024 10:16:58 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Sad to say, this is exactly the type of thing that needs to happen.

FedZilla is doing whatever the hell they want, and ignoring the states.


23 posted on 01/12/2024 10:17:37 AM PST by cld51860 ("This business will get out of control...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

“ Yes, this will probably be the flashpoint. However I think Abbot will back down. He’s not willing to go to war over this I don’t think. But we’ll see.”

I think he is looking for a Trump cabinet post.


24 posted on 01/12/2024 10:27:32 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz ( "Free Palestine" is the new "Heil Hitler!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fwdude; CatOwner
Such an event would require a sizable number of citizens to get involved and make the sacrifice. This isn't the 1860s, I'm afraid.

This! There are no "patriots" anymore. Too busy working, paying bills, making the payments on the boats, RV's, big lifted trucks, dirt bikes, etc. Americans have accepted peaceful slavery over dangerous freedom. They prefer it. At most, this has the potential of ending as another Ruby Ridge/Waco/Bundy Ranch/Lavoy Finicum situation. One side or the other will back down after a death or two. Then it's over.

25 posted on 01/12/2024 10:47:01 AM PST by dware (Americans prefer peaceful slavery over dangerous freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I understand that federal law allows the Border Patrol to enter onto private land within 25 miles of the border. But… I doubt that authority extends to commandeering private (or state) property to process and release illegal entrants. Enter maybe to patrol and detain maybe, but set up a processing center tent complex? Where is the statutory authority for that?

But really, the federal government needs to be forced to defend its violations of the Constitution before the Supreme Court.

First, there is the Guarantee Clause (Article IV, Section 4): “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion…” Allowing millions of illegals to settle in the USA in violation of federal law obviously deprives actual citizen voters and their states of a republican form of government. Recall that congressional representation is apportioned on the basis of total population including illegals. So the votes of some citizens (depending upon where they live) are diluted and of course the illegals create anchor baby citizens who will eventually dilute the votes of existing citizens further.

Second, Article I, Section 10 states that “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress … keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace … or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.” Here, it seems to me that the State of Texas is facing an “actual invasion” and is in “imminent danger” so they have the right ‘keep troops’ and ‘engage in war’. Especially so in this case where the federal government refuses to defend Texas’ borders.

Positioned correctly, these issues need to go before the Supreme Court.

Or just TEXIT already….


26 posted on 01/12/2024 10:48:36 AM PST by Stingray51 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

TX Natl Guard is still turning the illegals over to BP later.


27 posted on 01/12/2024 11:03:56 AM PST by moovova ("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem
Abbot will almost certainly back down; meanwhile he is raising public awareness.

Public awareness??? This violent country killing invasion has been going on since the late 70s...One big con job.. Gezuz.

28 posted on 01/12/2024 11:33:59 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Do not back down Texas. The Supreme Court has NO enforcement power. This is great news!


29 posted on 01/12/2024 12:12:55 PM PST by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

See if you *resident Bidet nationalizes the Texas National Guard, a la Arkasas:

“When integration began on September 4, 1957, the Arkansas National Guard was called in to “preserve the peace”. Originally at orders of the governor, they were meant to prevent the black students from entering due to claims that there was “imminent danger of tumult, riot and breach of peace” at the integration. However, President Eisenhower issued Executive Order 10730, which federalized the Arkansas National Guard and ordered them to support the integration on September 23 of that year, after which they protected the African American students.[3]”


30 posted on 01/12/2024 12:43:29 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Objective: Permanently break the will of the population to ever wage war again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yes Texas doing the job the government won’t do hat tip.


31 posted on 01/12/2024 2:10:17 PM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
... noting they are not sure ...

Well trained 'agents'!

32 posted on 01/12/2024 3:22:50 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

How about Kent State?


33 posted on 01/12/2024 3:23:31 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mopp4
Agree with beginning of CWII.

So does everyone in Hawaii!

34 posted on 01/12/2024 3:24:31 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands
Basically concede a small portion of the state to illegals,

To keep the camel OUT of the tent; one does NOT allow just his nose to enter!!

35 posted on 01/12/2024 3:25:40 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Stingray51
Second, Article I, Section 10 

   “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress … keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace … or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.”

 
Here, it seems to me that the State of Texas is facing an “actual invasion” and is in “imminent danger” so they have the right ‘keep troops’ and ‘engage in war’.
Especially so in this case where the federal government refuses to defend Texas’ borders.
 
 

(It ain't FACING; but undergoing one!)

 


36 posted on 01/12/2024 3:28:52 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson