Posted on 12/06/2023 5:11:23 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
Major California toy retailers without “gender-neutral” sections will be fined hundreds of dollars under Gov. Gavin Newsom’s pro-LGBTQ bill.
Assembly Bill No. 1084, signed by Newsom in 2021, will be enacted on January 1, 2024, and will require stores that sell “childcare items or toys” for children aged 12 years or younger to display a gender-neutral section — or be fined up to $500.
Stores will be required by law to have designated gender-neutral toys “regardless of whether they have been traditionally marketed for either girls or for boys,” the bill states.
The legislation will apply to retailers with 500 or more employees, and those who fail to comply will be “liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $250 for a first violation or $500 for a subsequent violation.”
The bill was originally introduced into the California Assembly by then-Assemblyman Evan Low (D-CA), who is now a representative in the U.S. Congress.
He celebrated Newsom signing the bill in a 2021 statement to the Associated Press, saying “We need to stop stigmatizing what’s acceptable for certain genders and just let kids be kids.”
“My hope is this bill encourages more businesses across California and the U.S. to avoid reinforcing harmful and outdated stereotypes,” Low said, adding that he was “incredibly grateful” for Newsom’s support on the bill.
When the assembly bill was first introduced, Lego released a statement saying that the company was working to make its products more inclusive for girls.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Back in the day, all toys were ‘gender neutral’!
https://schanelcpa.com › state-income-tax-can-follow-after-moving
... who the HELL are you, telling ME what I HAVE to sell in MY store?
... who the HELL are you, telling ME what I HAVE to sell in MY store?
... who the HELL are you, telling ME what I HAVE to sell in MY store?
Congress could, Chief Justice Warren wrote for the majority, under its commerce power, protect the economy from harm by enacting a prohibition generally applicable to any person who commits certain acts or possesses certain characteristics making him likely in Congress’s view to initiate political strikes or other harmful deeds and leaving it to the courts to determine whether a particular person committed the specified acts or possessed the specified characteristics.
It was impermissible, however, for Congress to designate a class of persons—members of the Communist Party—as being forbidden to hold union office.10 .
However, in United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258 (1967), a very similar statute making it unlawful for any member of a “Communist-action organization” to be employed in a defense facility was struck down on First Amendment grounds and the bill of attainder argument was ignored.
The dissenters viewed the statute as merely expressing in shorthand the characteristics of those persons who were likely to utilize union responsibilities to accomplish harmful acts; Congress could validly conclude that all members of the Communist Party possessed those characteristics.11 ---
----------------------------------------------------------------
We used to put homosexuals etal in this class; too. Elect a Muslim? Hardly!!
Next thing ya know, it'll be illegal for a camel to stick it's nose into a tent!
USA might have been a great melting pot experiment, but the dross is being to overshadow the metal.
This 'other' is not the one you are searching for.
Else someone could come along and screech:
ASSIGNED at birth gender!
But for the vast majority of toys and games, yes, there was NO specific toys for "boys" ( maybe G.I. Joe ) only.
Boys and girls played with toy guns, even Lionel had a "girls'" set of toy trains, in pastel colors; which is now worth a very great deal of money!
The CRAZIES, of today,just want to corrupt/spoil everything.
I was assured that gender was an artificial construct.
Cheaper to pay the fine than to deal with the nonsense and overhead of this crap.. which may be the laws intended purpose...
What does the law say those fines must be used for?
...Barbi was WAY ahead of her time, she’s always been “gender neutral”.
Not really.
He only deserves half of a helicopter ride.
Your posts are usually OK then there’s a weird one every now and then that borders on stalking me
Like that one.
yup, damn
Ken’s the one without a penis
you can hide - if you run fast enough.
I don’t know what you’re doing but it is time for you to stop posting to me.
You have a freaky obsession with me and have been stalking me for years.
Your behavior is often strange and whatever you are attempting here is creepy.
That’s why the admins removed your previous post.
I told you to knock it off years ago but I thought maybe you had gtown up.
Obviously you have not.
Stay away from me. Do not post to me again.
Knock it off! Now!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.