Skip to comments.
THE FCC JUST VOTED TO TAKE CONTROL OF THE INTERNET
TheHighWire.com ^
| Nov 15 2023
| STEVEN MIDDENDORP
Posted on 11/16/2023 12:39:58 PM PST by Aquamarine
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121 next last
To: Aquamarine
The FCC will review consumer complaints of digital discrimination of access through an improved consumer complaint portal Excellent lets flood said portal with 10s of thousands of examples of conservatives being discriminated against.
61
posted on
11/16/2023 3:00:41 PM PST
by
usurper
(AI was born with a birth defect.)
To: All
The Constitution means nothing, absolutely nothing.
All we have is a third world, thieving, lying, criminal government. And we will not be "allowed" to say anything about it. 🙄
62
posted on
11/16/2023 3:02:12 PM PST
by
Pajamajan
(Pray for our nation. Never be slave e in a new Socialist America .)
To: Aquamarine
Since trans are 0.01% of the population, if they aren't generating 50% of YouTube videos then they are being discriminated against.
The only thing to do is to shutdown all of the "rightwing" YouTube channels so the content creation is equal.
To: Aquamarine
Strange... I don’t recall voting for this...
Order your ammo and long term storage food now.
64
posted on
11/16/2023 3:09:55 PM PST
by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
To: DannyTN
Our forefathers net at watering holes.
Works for me.
Maybe someone could start up a Liberty Tree chain of bars...
65
posted on
11/16/2023 3:14:03 PM PST
by
mewzilla
(Never give up; surrender!)
To: mewzilla
66
posted on
11/16/2023 3:14:25 PM PST
by
mewzilla
(Never give up; surrender!)
To: Aquamarine
Shouldn’t the American people vote on this… not decided on by the FCC?
67
posted on
11/16/2023 3:17:46 PM PST
by
HollyB
To: Aquamarine
SCOTUS has ruled this unconstitutional. In 3 separate cases.
68
posted on
11/16/2023 3:21:33 PM PST
by
TornadoAlley3
( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
To: Aquamarine
There will be absolutely no blow-back on this latest addition to the shackles of tyranny we already bear...
The GOP and the serfs will shrug there shoulders and pretend nothing has changed...
The pure advantages and completeness of communist tyranny are once again brought into focus...
69
posted on
11/16/2023 3:29:33 PM PST
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperately need him)
To: Aquamarine
Wasn’t that nice of them to vote to give themselves so much power over the Internet?
70
posted on
11/16/2023 3:38:29 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
( "It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled."- Mark Twain)
To: mewzilla; All
“Hope we have a low-tech back-up plan...”
Carrier Pigeon? Our old CB Radios? Decoder Rings?
Ugh! How I hate the world we’re FORCED to live in!
71
posted on
11/16/2023 3:44:08 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
To: Aquamarine
China does this same thing.
Odd coincidence that our “President” is on the CCP payroll.
Ministry of Disinformation and all that.
72
posted on
11/16/2023 3:46:30 PM PST
by
Texas resident
(Biden=Obama=Jarrett=Soros)
To: Eleutheria5
The government cant stop call centers in India from making harassing spam calls from spoofed number but they think that they can regulate what you post?
73
posted on
11/16/2023 3:49:26 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
( "It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled."- Mark Twain)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
74
posted on
11/16/2023 3:52:02 PM PST
by
Songcraft
( )
To: dljordan
Legally they can’t. The FCC only has powers given to them by Congress that pass constitutional muster.
75
posted on
11/16/2023 3:53:17 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
( "It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled."- Mark Twain)
To: Songcraft
Smoke signals?
76
posted on
11/16/2023 3:56:46 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
To: unixfox
Yes, thanks for the clarification.
77
posted on
11/16/2023 4:12:08 PM PST
by
subterfuge
(I'm a pure-blood!)
To: Aquamarine
Great!, so when I move to my dream off the grid hideaway in the remotest part of Montana or Wyoming, the FCC will force one of the ISPs to run fiber all the way out to me? That’s awesome. And I’d better have the same multi-gig speeds and low latency as those city dwellers who have the best service, otherwise it’s discrimination. And my bill had better be no more than they’re charging those city dwellers as well, or….you know…discrimination.
On second thought, I just checked my melanin level and realized that it’s probably too low to qualify for this “non-discriminatory” plan.
78
posted on
11/16/2023 4:15:22 PM PST
by
noiseman
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: gibsonguy
I suggest that no one, except perhaps Congress, has standing to object to the rule now. Once the FCC pursues enforcement, then there will be an injured party.
79
posted on
11/16/2023 4:18:10 PM PST
by
jimfree
(My 21 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than Joe Biden.)
To: Aquamarine
TYPING IN ALL CAPS IS
Neither your headline nor your post deserve any more attention than anyone else's, and most of the rest have the common courtesy not to shout for no reason.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson