Posted on 10/04/2023 11:57:27 AM PDT by cotton1706
Steve Scalise: 58%
Jim Jordan: 94%
Kevin McCarthy: 54%
(Excerpt) Read more at libertyscore.conservativereview.com ...
Good info to have.
https://libertyscore.conservativereview.com/steve-scalise
https://libertyscore.conservativereview.com/jim-jordan
JORDAN’S THE MAN!!
Health
Multiple Myeloma
On August 29, 2023, Scalise announced he had been diagnosed with multiple myeloma. He said the cancer was detected early and was “very treatable”.[108]
On September 14, Scalise returned to work, having begun chemotherapy, and reported that his treatment was “going well.”
Take care of youself, Steve. Jim can take it from here.
Well, on votes Scalise might not look much better than McCarthy, but a crazy commie shot him, so perhaps he took that to heart and understands the seriousness of the situation...
Well, THAT should do it!
I can live with either one of them. Whichever one it is, he had better insist that the rule be changed that allows one person to call for vacating the chair to a majority of the caucus.
Scalise Is a RINO. Always has been. He is part of the problem, not the solution.
Jim Jordan: 94%
Kevin McCarthy: 54%
Well, that does it! Jim Jordan IS McCarthy Lite. /S
Thanks for posting!
“ Whichever one it is, he had better insist that the rule be changed that allows one person to call for vacating the chair to a majority of the caucus.”
****************************************************************
Why? It’s that rule which allowed McCarthy to be held accountable for failing to keep his promises.
Any scoring for others? Trump, Donalds, etc.
“Perhaps?” One guy with close to 100% and the other barely over 50% and you use “perhaps” as a reason to support Mr 50%? I hope you don’t vote in important elections using that criteria.
For one thing, the scores are based on a metric established by an organization that has its own political agenda. That's OK, but in some cases the "good" score on their scale may be diametrically opposed to what I think is a sound political philosophy.
For example, some of these ratings systems are set up in such a way that an open-borders, "free trade" advocate will score higher than a MAGA-type who advocates strict immigration controls and protectionist tariffs.
And there are always those members of Congress who will never stay in office if they vote against certain bills that benefit key industries in their own jurisdictions (think Lindsey Graham with Boeing Corp., Charles Grassley with Archer Daniels Midland, Mitt Romney with Jockey Underwear /just kidding/, etc.)
My pick would be for Byron Donalds, but Jim Jordan would be a worthy selection.
Vermin Supreme.
Score Eleventy seven + 'orange'
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.