Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

WOW, if true!
1 posted on 10/03/2023 7:36:42 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Would be fun to see, just to watch heads explode.


2 posted on 10/03/2023 7:37:50 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Trump cannot do this now even if he wanted to.

I like the out of the box thinking.


3 posted on 10/03/2023 7:37:53 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Keep him out of the Presidency if he falls for it.


4 posted on 10/03/2023 7:38:43 PM PDT by Jonty30 (It never rains in sunny Alberta. It always rains in rainy Alberta.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

It’s fun to imagine what would happen, but I don’t think he realistically has the votes with the slim majority vs # of RINOs.


5 posted on 10/03/2023 7:39:15 PM PDT by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

He should either run for Speaker or president. If he takes the speaker job, it will hurt his presidential chances, plus a lot of voters will not vote for him, if he has the other position.


6 posted on 10/03/2023 7:39:31 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Hannity is SUCH A DUMB ASS!


7 posted on 10/03/2023 7:39:42 PM PDT by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA. -PRO-MAX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Sounds like Tick-Tock Bombshell idiocy.

Why the hell would Donald Trump degrade himself by taking a position where he answers to 400+ duplicitous A-holes who could fire him on a moment’s notice?

8 posted on 10/03/2023 7:39:51 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Trump, the consensus builder…


9 posted on 10/03/2023 7:39:51 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

You talk about heads exploding nationwide, I want to see it.

YES, then he can sign subpoena and Arrest and Detainment Warrants for ALL OF THEM and JAIL them himself.

Comey
Clapper
Brennan
Clinton
Wray
Mayorkas

The Capitol JAIL should hold them easily until the New Speaker signs an order transferring them all to Club Gitmo.

“U.S. CODE
TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS
CHAPTER 6—CONGRESSIONAL AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE; INVESTIGATIONS
Sec. 193. Privilege of witnesses
No witness is privileged to refuse to testify to any fact, or to produce any paper, respecting which he shall be examined by either House of Congress, or by any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or by any committee of either House, upon the ground that his testimony to such fact or his production of such paper may tend to disgrace him or otherwise render him infamous.”

Simply look up Hinds Precedents, especially chapters 53 and 51, and Cannon’s Precedents, especially chapters 184-185. You’ll find numerous detailed cases of Congress asserting its power, arresting people, holding them until they agreed to answer questions, and then releasing them. Some of these people did not refuse to appear, but simply failed to satisfactorily answer questions.

Congress has the authority to arrest and imprison those found in Contempt. The power extends throughout the United States and is an inherent power (does not depend upon legislated act)

If found in Contempt the person can be arrested under a warrant of the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President of the Senate, by the respective Sergeant at Arms.

Statutory criminal contempt is an alternative to inherent contempt.

Under the inherent contempt power Congress may imprison a person for a specific period of time or an indefinite period of time, except a person imprisoned by the House of Representatives may not be imprisoned beyond adjournment of a session of Congress.

Imprisonment may be coercive or punitive.

Some references

[1] Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution, Volume 2, § 842 http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/a1_5s21.html

[2] Anderson v. Dunn - 19 U.S. 204 - “And, as to the distance to which the process might reach, it is very clear that there exists no reason for confining its operation to the limits of the District of Columbia; after passing those limits, we know no bounds that can be prescribed to its range but those of the United States.” http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/204/case.html

[3] Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/125/case.html 73rd Cong., 78 Cong. Rec. 2410 (1934) https://archive.org/details/congressionalrec78aunit

[4] McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 - Under a warrant issued by the President of the Senate the Deputy to the Senate Sergeant at Arms arrested at Cincinnati, Ohio, Mally S. Daugherty, who had been twice subpoenaed by the Senate and twice failed to appear. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/135/case.html

[5] Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule IV Duties of the Sergeant at Arms - [] execute the commands of the House, and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/pdf/HMAN-105-pg348.pdf

[6] An analysis of Congressional inquiry, subpoena, and enforcement http://www.constitutionproject.org/documents/when-congress-comes-calling-a-primer-on-the-principles-practices-and-pragmatics-of-legislative-inquiry/

In 1857, a New York Times reporter refused to say which members of Congress had asked him to get them bribes (protecting his “sources” just as various Judith Millers today protect the people who feed them proven lies that costs thousands of lives), so Congress locked him up until he answered and then banned him from Congress.

In 1924 an oil executive appeared but refused to answer certain questions, so the Senate held — literally held — him in contempt. Senator Thomas Walsh of Montana argued that this question of contempt was of the gravest importance, and that it involved “the very life of the effective existence of the House of Representatives of the United States and of the Senate of the United States.” The matter was taken to court, and the witness fined and imprisoned.


11 posted on 10/03/2023 7:41:15 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

The Demoncrat Party would melt down in 3-2-1..


12 posted on 10/03/2023 7:42:15 PM PDT by Shady (The Force of Liberty must prevail for the sake of our Children and Grandchildren...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Someone put a suicide watch on Rob Reiner! 😜


14 posted on 10/03/2023 7:42:54 PM PDT by Shady (The Force of Liberty must prevail for the sake of our Children and Grandchildren...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Sean “Oz Can’t Lose” Hannity. DUMBASSERY! A font of bad, incredibly STUPID IDEAS.


15 posted on 10/03/2023 7:44:14 PM PDT by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA. -PRO-MAX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

He’d never get enough votes.


16 posted on 10/03/2023 7:44:35 PM PDT by Husker24 (Pp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Contact your Congress critters!


17 posted on 10/03/2023 7:44:35 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (“Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God” -Matthew 5:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Let's take a few steps back.

Mister Trump would need at least 218 votes to secure SOTH.

That is beyond unlikely.

The Dems would be zero, and the GOPers got a whopping 8 votes to unseat McCarthy.

Beyond unlikely, beyond sane consideration.

18 posted on 10/03/2023 7:45:27 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never...in nothing, great or small...Winston ChurchIill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

It is a trap for Trump. He had better not do it.


24 posted on 10/03/2023 7:49:04 PM PDT by Parley Baer (GO )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Do it...repubs/conservatives need to generate a little chaos for once. Gaetz is shaking things up and I love him for it. Send the turtle over the edge!! Send Pelosi batty. Well, battier.


25 posted on 10/03/2023 7:49:25 PM PDT by toddausauras (Trump Lake 2024....Go down swinging!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Well...ain’t that something... if there is to be justice... this would be justice.


26 posted on 10/03/2023 7:50:09 PM PDT by WinstonSmith1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Hannity is controlled opposition


29 posted on 10/03/2023 7:58:24 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

It is not in the best interest of DJT at this time to become Speaker.


30 posted on 10/03/2023 7:58:41 PM PDT by sam_whiskey (Peace through Strength. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson