Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘That is disgraceful’: Trump goes after fraud suit judge’s law clerk on Truth Social mid-trial and calls her ‘Schumer’s girlfriend’
law and crime ^

Posted on 10/03/2023 1:53:19 PM PDT by bryan999

Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday decided to send a Truth Social post during his New York fraud civil trial attacking Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron’s principal law clerk as Sen. Chuck Schumer’s (D) “girlfriend,” sharing an image of Ashley Greenfield and Schumer smiling in a photograph and linking to her Instagram profile.

“Schumer’s girlfriend, Alison [sic] R. Greenfield, is running this case against me. How disgraceful! This case should be dismissed immediately,” the post said.

While the move is to legal observers likely to spark more gag order talk, as Trump’s social media postings have in his Jan. 6 federal criminal case, the former president is predictably posting about Allison Greenfield while sharing a photo of her with Schumer, the top Democrat in the Senate, to signal to his supporters that they, New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) and Judge Engoron (D) are playing politics to destroy his family business.

(Excerpt) Read more at lawandcrime.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alisongreenfield; allisongreenfield; arrestengoron; donate2trump; donatedonaldtrump; donatetrump; electioninterference
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: bryan999
She’s a porker.


21 posted on 10/03/2023 2:07:52 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

“Trump goes after fraud suit judge’s law clerk on Truth Social mid-trial and calls her ‘Schumer’s girlfriend’”

LOVE IT...and the NeverTrumpers here wonder why they cannot pry us loose from Trump.


22 posted on 10/03/2023 2:09:17 PM PDT by BobL (I own an F150 so that I can tow my boat all day Saturday and look Manly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Isn’t Chuck Schumer, Amy Schumer’s uncle?


23 posted on 10/03/2023 2:09:36 PM PDT by desertsolitaire (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jim W N

Judges are like cats - they do what they want


24 posted on 10/03/2023 2:14:59 PM PDT by bigbob (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HonorInPa

Go cry in your cheerios


25 posted on 10/03/2023 2:15:47 PM PDT by Fledermaus (It's time to get rid of the Three McStooges; Mitch, Kevin and Ronna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
US Presidents are like US Marines. Ain't no 'former' about it.

When addressing a former President of the United States in a formal setting, the correct form is “Mr. LastName.” (“President LastName” or “Mr. President” are terms reserved for the current head of state.) This is true for other ex-officials, as well. When talking about the person to a third party, on the other hand, it’s appropriate to say, “former President LastName.” This holds for introductions, as well: A current state governor is introduced as “Governor Tom Smith,” while you’d introduce an ex-governor as “former Governor Jim Bell.”

26 posted on 10/03/2023 2:17:54 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Imagine if this was the judge assigned to your case.

Trump Judge: If juries get it wrong, I can overrule them based on my emotions about the case

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1709182631139520733


27 posted on 10/03/2023 2:23:32 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: randita

Yes!!!!!


28 posted on 10/03/2023 2:27:36 PM PDT by Thank You Rush ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

All I see is a woman and a guy who looks like he’d flash little kids, while he’s wearing a trenchcoat.


29 posted on 10/03/2023 2:31:42 PM PDT by Fireone (Who killed Obama's chef?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

30 posted on 10/03/2023 2:37:56 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

Piss your enemy off. Sometimes it will goad them into making strategic mistakes out of pique. Keep ‘em defensive and afraid.


31 posted on 10/03/2023 2:42:16 PM PDT by William of Barsoom (In Omnia, Paratus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

She needs to recuse herself. In my simplistic view, unlike the Honorable Clarence Thomas, she’s (D)ifferent.


32 posted on 10/03/2023 2:43:53 PM PDT by Shanty Shaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

Guess the msm is dodging the issues of the case by playing up gotcha gossip drama nonsense.


33 posted on 10/03/2023 2:46:55 PM PDT by AndyTheBear (Certified smarter than average for my species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HonorInPa

LOL, they’re already prosecuting him for crimes that don’t exist. What’s a gag order to him? They can go to hell, you can’t gag the leading presidential contender during an election year, his voice will be heard.


34 posted on 10/03/2023 2:47:19 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim W N

Yep, so effectively the only argument is that Trump’s speech might make the judge mad and that might make the judge impartial, but if that is the case, then he is unqualified to be a judge in the first place.


35 posted on 10/03/2023 2:48:57 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

And this is what FR has become. What a shame.


36 posted on 10/03/2023 2:49:19 PM PDT by HonorInPa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: stanne

You’re taking it literally.

The point is that she’s politically active and thus biased. She has no business running a court case against him and should have disqualified herself.


37 posted on 10/03/2023 2:54:18 PM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HonorInPa

Yeah, a shame you’re here. I hope some judge goes after you politically and see how you respond.

Probably just bend over.


38 posted on 10/03/2023 3:06:12 PM PDT by Fledermaus (It's time to get rid of the Three McStooges; Mitch, Kevin and Ronna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra

He has since deleted it.


39 posted on 10/03/2023 3:06:37 PM PDT by mak5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

NFW!


40 posted on 10/03/2023 3:09:22 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (BOYCOTT Anheuser Busch, the NFL, MLB, NBA, NASCAR & Faux Snooze! Molon Labe! Oathkeeper! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson