Posted on 09/27/2023 1:20:20 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
On Wednesday, CNN Chief National Affairs Analyst and host Kasie Hunt and CNN Political Correspondent Sara Murray reacted to an announcement from House Republicans that they had uncovered two 2019 wire transfers from Chinese nationals to Hunter Biden that listed his father’s Delaware home as the beneficiary address by stating that there’s not “any fire shown around the president” and there’s no indication Joe Biden got or knew about the money.
On “CNN News Central,” Murray said, “House Republicans are launching this impeachment inquiry and they’re trying to make the argument that essentially there was no daylight between what Hunter Biden was doing and his business dealings, and what Joe Biden, now the president of the United States, was involved in. But, of course, they fall short of meeting that mark in terms of actual proof. In this instance, they’re not putting forward any evidence that Joe Biden received any of this money, knew [of] any of this money. They’re just putting forth this example of the address where Hunter Biden was living at the time.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
They can see it here.
Much too late, IMHO.
What will it take?
Video of Biden cashing a check?..................
Hey, CNN! Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Since when did CNN need proof?
There’s never any “proof” when the turd rollers in the extreme far-left, “media” report it. Weird how the “media” slobs never tire of kissing commie lib asses and pulling their chestnuts out of the fire. There’s never any “proof” of the RAT allegations against Trump but the Dung Beetle Party owns all the tyranical black-robed “judges” so they serve conservative white Americans nothing but sh** sandwiches in their courts.
Any lefty that denies the media is part and parcel of the dem plantation needs to be reminded of this BS and then studiously ignored in perpetuity.
“Plausible Deniability” is only plausable if you aren’t completely sticking your head in the sand, or pretending to.
This isn’t something that happened on the other side of the world (although it involves that too). It’s something that happened in his family, in his name, and at his address. There’s no way he, or at least his staff, didn’t know exactly where money was coming from and going, and if his staff, lawyers, handlers, and accountants were sheltering him, then they need to be pulled before congress.
dear cnn...
what is the biden family business?
trump has real estate. bushes have oil.
what is the biden family business? joe biden.
Kasie Hunt didn’t actually see the bank robber hold up the bank and is not interested in finding out why he moved into the massive Malibu mansion shortly thereafter so she concluded he just couldn’t have done it.
I always think of the money swirling around Joe is like rain. Everyone around him is getting soaked, yet we are supposed to believe this guy isn’t even damp?
Give me a break.
Nitwits: these mafia types only leave circumstantial evidence. That’s why you see ersatz corporations to hide money.
The crime family is going down; but not while these toads run the DOJ. News media are absolutely complicit.
Remember when the MSM asked Joe about Congress looking into his personal business? He said, “good luck”. He prolly has the best ‘financial advisors’ available.
No proof by CNN?
Did anyone check the emails on the Laptop or verify with the National Archives of Joe fake email accounts?
Oh. Real investigative journalism by media or CNN? I see you all laughing because that’s not going to happen.
AT LEAST-—Many in the media are recognizable.
Need to ID your target.
Remember this is the same CCN who had a reporter, standing at a BLM riot in Minneapolis, in front of a burning building, telling us it was “a mostly peaceful protest”.
Is there proof he know who he is?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.